Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BANX vs CSWC vs ARCC vs GBDC vs PFLT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BANX
ArrowMark Financial Corp.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$155M
5Y Perf.+15.4%
CSWC
Capital Southwest Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.42B
5Y Perf.+70.8%
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$13.65B
5Y Perf.+28.9%
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.43B
5Y Perf.+8.4%
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$885M
5Y Perf.+7.2%

BANX vs CSWC vs ARCC vs GBDC vs PFLT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BANX logoBANX
CSWC logoCSWC
ARCC logoARCC
GBDC logoGBDC
PFLT logoPFLT
IndustryAsset ManagementAsset ManagementAsset ManagementAsset ManagementAsset Management
Market Cap$155M$1.42B$13.65B$3.43B$885M
Revenue (TTM)$29M$164M$3.15B$871M$172M
Net Income (TTM)$38M$103M$1.15B$205M$118M
Gross Margin100.0%66.5%75.7%81.5%45.6%
Operating Margin79.7%48.5%69.7%78.9%39.4%
Forward P/E8.7x10.0x9.9x9.5x7.9x
Total Debt$47M$956M$15.99B$4.90B$1.78B
Cash & Equiv.$9M$43M$924M$24M$123M

BANX vs CSWC vs ARCC vs GBDC vs PFLTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BANX
CSWC
ARCC
GBDC
PFLT
StockMay 20May 26Return
ArrowMark Financial… (BANX)100115.4+15.4%
Capital Southwest C… (CSWC)100170.8+70.8%
Ares Capital Corpor… (ARCC)100128.9+28.9%
Golub Capital BDC, … (GBDC)100108.4+8.4%
PennantPark Floatin… (PFLT)100107.2+7.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BANX vs CSWC vs ARCC vs GBDC vs PFLT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GBDC leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. BANX and CSWC also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BANX
ArrowMark Financial Corp.
The Banking Pick

BANX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and bank quality.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 30.2%, current ratio 0.57x
  • NIM 12.1% vs ARCC's 3.6%
  • Beta 0.28 vs CSWC's 0.81, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and bank quality
CSWC
Capital Southwest Corporation
The Banking Pick

CSWC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 233.4% 10Y total return vs ARCC's 139.6%
  • +32.8% vs ARCC's -0.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, ARCC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
The Banking Pick

GBDC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.

  • Rev growth 42.5%, EPS growth 4.4%
  • PEG 0.31 vs BANX's 2.12
  • Beta 0.61, yield 10.5%, current ratio 5.35x
  • 42.5% NII/revenue growth vs PFLT's 2.2%
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.
The Banking Pick

PFLT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.78, yield 13.5%
  • Lower P/E (7.9x vs 9.9x), PEG 0.89 vs 0.97
  • 13.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs GBDC's 10.5%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGBDC logoGBDC42.5% NII/revenue growth vs PFLT's 2.2%
ValuePFLT logoPFLTLower P/E (7.9x vs 9.9x), PEG 0.89 vs 0.97
Quality / MarginsGBDC logoGBDCEfficiency ratio 0.0% vs BANX's 0.2% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyBANX logoBANXBeta 0.28 vs CSWC's 0.81, lower leverage
DividendsPFLT logoPFLT13.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs GBDC's 10.5%
Momentum (1Y)CSWC logoCSWC+32.8% vs ARCC's -0.3%
Efficiency (ROA)GBDC logoGBDCEfficiency ratio 0.0% vs BANX's 0.2%

BANX vs CSWC vs ARCC vs GBDC vs PFLT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBANXLAGGINGGBDC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BANX leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

ARCC is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 106.7x BANX's $29M. BANX is the more profitable business, keeping 56.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PFLT's 38.7%.

MetricBANX logoBANXArrowMark Financi…CSWC logoCSWCCapital Southwest…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…GBDC logoGBDCGolub Capital BDC…PFLT logoPFLTPennantPark Float…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$29M$164M$3.1B$871M$172M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$48M$142M$2.0B$431M$39M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$38M$103M$1.1B$205M$118M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$31M-$69M$1.1B$313M$242M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+100.0%+66.5%+75.7%+81.5%+45.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+79.7%+48.5%+69.7%+78.9%+39.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+56.8%+43.1%+41.3%+43.2%+38.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+46.8%-132.6%+36.3%-13.0%+55.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+37.1%+113.3%-63.9%-160.0%+165.4%
BANX leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PFLT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 8.4x trailing earnings, BANX trades at a 48% valuation discount to CSWC's 16.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GBDC offers better value at 0.30x vs BANX's 2.05x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricBANX logoBANXArrowMark Financi…CSWC logoCSWCCapital Southwest…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…GBDC logoGBDCGolub Capital BDC…PFLT logoPFLTPennantPark Float…
Market CapShares × price$155M$1.4B$13.6B$3.4B$885M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$193M$2.3B$28.7B$8.3B$2.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS8.44x16.24x10.22x9.27x12.39x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.74x10.01x9.94x9.53x7.90x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.05x0.99x0.30x1.39x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.24x27.35x13.11x12.08x37.62x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.26x8.67x4.34x3.94x5.16x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.91x1.38x0.93x0.88x0.77x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.24x11.95x9.31x
PFLT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BANX leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

BANX delivers a 24.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $5 for GBDC. BANX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFLT's 1.65x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BANX scores 5/9 vs CSWC's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricBANX logoBANXArrowMark Financi…CSWC logoCSWCCapital Southwest…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…GBDC logoGBDCGolub Capital BDC…PFLT logoPFLTPennantPark Float…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+24.6%+10.3%+8.1%+5.2%+11.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+18.0%+4.8%+3.8%+2.3%+4.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.8%+3.5%+5.7%+5.9%+2.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+11.7%+4.6%+7.5%+7.8%+2.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–951444
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.30x1.08x1.12x1.23x1.65x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$38M$913M$15.1B$4.9B$1.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$9M$43M$924M$24M$123M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$47M$956M$16.0B$4.9B$1.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense6.36x2.91x2.98x1.62x0.35x
BANX leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CSWC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CSWC five years ago would be worth $15,167 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,908 for PFLT. Over the past 12 months, CSWC leads with a +32.8% total return vs ARCC's -0.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BANX at 21.3% vs PFLT's 5.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBANX logoBANXArrowMark Financi…CSWC logoCSWCCapital Southwest…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…GBDC logoGBDCGolub Capital BDC…PFLT logoPFLTPennantPark Float…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-7.3%+10.9%-4.6%-0.6%-0.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+9.4%+32.8%-0.3%+2.0%+0.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+78.5%+75.2%+34.5%+35.4%+17.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+44.3%+51.7%+48.0%+33.9%+19.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+118.9%+233.4%+139.6%+61.1%+72.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+21.3%+20.6%+10.4%+10.6%+5.7%
CSWC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BANX and CSWC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BANX is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CSWC's 0.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSWC currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs ARCC's 81.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBANX logoBANXArrowMark Financi…CSWC logoCSWCCapital Southwest…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…GBDC logoGBDCGolub Capital BDC…PFLT logoPFLTPennantPark Float…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.28x0.81x0.75x0.61x0.78x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$23.67$24.43$23.42$15.63$10.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$18.45$19.37$17.40$11.77$7.68
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+83.8%+97.7%+81.2%+84.2%+82.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.359.352.949.157.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded44K662K7.4M2.3M1.0M
Evenly matched — BANX and CSWC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

PFLT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BANX as "Buy", CSWC as "Buy", ARCC as "Buy", GBDC as "Buy", PFLT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.7% upside for PFLT (target: $11) vs -1.3% for CSWC (target: $24). For income investors, PFLT offers the higher dividend yield at 13.51% vs ARCC's 2.02%.

MetricBANX logoBANXArrowMark Financi…CSWC logoCSWCCapital Southwest…ARCC logoARCCAres Capital Corp…GBDC logoGBDCGolub Capital BDC…PFLT logoPFLTPennantPark Float…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$23.58$21.88$14.25$10.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts810321111
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+9.5%+10.2%+2.0%+10.5%+13.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises03003
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.88$2.45$0.38$1.38$1.21
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+2.3%0.0%
PFLT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

BANX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PFLT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallArrowMark Financial Corp. (BANX)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BANX vs CSWC vs ARCC vs GBDC vs PFLT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BANX or CSWC or ARCC or GBDC or PFLT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Golub Capital BDC, Inc.

(GBDC) is the stronger pick with 42. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). ArrowMark Financial Corp. (BANX) offers the better valuation at 8. 4x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ArrowMark Financial Corp. (BANX) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BANX or CSWC or ARCC or GBDC or PFLT?

On trailing P/E, ArrowMark Financial Corp.

(BANX) is the cheapest at 8. 4x versus Capital Southwest Corporation at 16. 2x. On forward P/E, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is actually cheaper at 7. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Golub Capital BDC, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus ArrowMark Financial Corp. 's 2. 12x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BANX or CSWC or ARCC or GBDC or PFLT?

Over the past 5 years, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) delivered a total return of +51.

7%, compared to +19. 1% for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSWC returned +233. 4% versus GBDC's +61. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BANX or CSWC or ARCC or GBDC or PFLT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ArrowMark Financial Corp.

(BANX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Capital Southwest Corporation's 0. 81β — meaning CSWC is approximately 195% more volatile than BANX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ArrowMark Financial Corp. (BANX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 165% for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BANX or CSWC or ARCC or GBDC or PFLT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Golub Capital BDC, Inc.

(GBDC) is pulling ahead at 42. 5% versus 2. 2% for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Golub Capital BDC, Inc. grew EPS 4. 4% year-over-year, compared to -48. 6% for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BANX or CSWC or ARCC or GBDC or PFLT?

ArrowMark Financial Corp.

(BANX) is the more profitable company, earning 56. 8% net margin versus 38. 7% for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. — meaning it keeps 56. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BANX leads at 79. 7% versus 39. 4% for PFLT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BANX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BANX or CSWC or ARCC or GBDC or PFLT more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus ArrowMark Financial Corp. 's 2. 12x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) trades at 7. 9x forward P/E versus 10. 0x for Capital Southwest Corporation — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PFLT: 17. 7% to $10. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BANX or CSWC or ARCC or GBDC or PFLT?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) offers the highest yield at 13. 5%, versus 2. 0% for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC).

09

Is BANX or CSWC or ARCC or GBDC or PFLT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, ArrowMark Financial Corp.

(BANX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 9. 5% yield, +118. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BANX: +118. 9%, PFLT: +72. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BANX and CSWC and ARCC and GBDC and PFLT?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BANX is a small-cap deep-value stock; CSWC is a small-cap deep-value stock; ARCC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GBDC is a small-cap high-growth stock; PFLT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BANX

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 34%
  • Dividend Yield > 3.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CSWC

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 25%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ARCC

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Net Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GBDC

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 21%
  • Net Margin > 25%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PFLT

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 23%
  • Dividend Yield > 5.4%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BANX and CSWC and ARCC and GBDC and PFLT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BANX: 2.7% · CSWC: 7.7%)
Net Margin>
%
(BANX: 56.8% · CSWC: 43.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(BANX: 8.4x · CSWC: 16.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.