Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BBAR vs LOMA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BBAR
Banco BBVA Argentina S.A.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • AR
Market Cap$3.19B
5Y Perf.+392.7%
LOMA
Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima

Construction Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • AR
Market Cap$1.37B
5Y Perf.+153.2%

BBAR vs LOMA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BBAR logoBBAR
LOMA logoLOMA
IndustryBanks - RegionalConstruction Materials
Market Cap$3.19B$1.37B
Revenue (TTM)$5.20T$774.35B
Net Income (TTM)$258.90B$19.71B
Gross Margin65.9%21.8%
Operating Margin8.5%9.5%
Forward P/E0.0x0.0x
Total Debt$349.00B$301.33B
Cash & Equiv.$2.82T$9.76B

BBAR vs LOMALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BBAR
LOMA
StockMay 20May 26Return
Banco BBVA Argentin… (BBAR)100492.7+392.7%
Loma Negra Compañía… (LOMA)100253.2+153.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BBAR vs LOMA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BBAR leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BBAR
Banco BBVA Argentina S.A.
The Banking Pick

BBAR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.02, yield 2.0%
  • -7.3% 10Y total return vs LOMA's -34.8%
  • Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.0x)
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
LOMA
Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima
The Growth Play

LOMA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 41.3%, EPS growth -96.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.50, Low D/E 28.3%, current ratio 1.44x
  • Beta 1.50, yield 0.0%, current ratio 1.44x
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLOMA logoLOMA41.3% revenue growth vs BBAR's -31.1%
ValueBBAR logoBBARLower P/E (0.0x vs 0.0x)
Quality / MarginsBBAR logoBBAR6.9% margin vs LOMA's 2.5%
Stability / SafetyLOMA logoLOMABeta 1.50 vs BBAR's 2.02
DividendsBBAR logoBBAR2.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)LOMA logoLOMA+2.0% vs BBAR's -19.0%
Efficiency (ROA)BBAR logoBBAR1.4% ROA vs LOMA's 1.1%, ROIC 10.7% vs 6.2%

BBAR vs LOMA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBBARLAGGINGLOMA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BBAR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

BBAR is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.20T annually — 6.7x LOMA's $774.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.9% (BBAR) to 2.5% (LOMA).

MetricBBAR logoBBARBanco BBVA Argent…LOMA logoLOMALoma Negra Compañ…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5.20T$774.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$421.5B$118.7B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$258.9B$19.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$3.96T-$245M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+65.9%+21.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+8.5%+9.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.9%+2.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-102.7%-0.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-64.8%-71.9%
BBAR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BBAR leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 12.6x trailing earnings, BBAR trades at a 82% valuation discount to LOMA's 70.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BBAR's 3.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LOMA's 11.3x.

MetricBBAR logoBBARBanco BBVA Argent…LOMA logoLOMALoma Negra Compañ…
Market CapShares × price$3.2B$1.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.4B$1.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.59x70.23x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.0.01x0.02x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.20x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.79x11.27x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.85x1.93x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.70x1.78x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
BBAR leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BBAR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

BBAR delivers a 9.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $2 for LOMA. BBAR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LOMA's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LOMA scores 6/9 vs BBAR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricBBAR logoBBARBanco BBVA Argent…LOMA logoLOMALoma Negra Compañ…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+9.1%+2.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.4%+1.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+10.7%+6.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.7%+7.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.13x0.28x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$2.47T$291.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.82T$9.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$349.0B$301.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.16x1.47x
BBAR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BBAR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BBAR five years ago would be worth $68,265 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $23,634 for LOMA. Over the past 12 months, LOMA leads with a +2.0% total return vs BBAR's -19.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BBAR at 61.2% vs LOMA's 25.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBBAR logoBBARBanco BBVA Argent…LOMA logoLOMALoma Negra Compañ…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-12.2%-9.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-19.0%+2.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+318.7%+95.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+582.7%+136.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-7.3%-34.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+61.2%+25.1%
BBAR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

LOMA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

LOMA is the less volatile stock with a 1.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBAR's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LOMA currently trades 82.6% from its 52-week high vs BBAR's 67.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBBAR logoBBARBanco BBVA Argent…LOMA logoLOMALoma Negra Compañ…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.02x1.50x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$23.10$14.17
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.76$7.04
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+67.6%+82.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10044.653.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded667K390K
LOMA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

BBAR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates BBAR as "Buy" and LOMA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.4% upside for BBAR (target: $16) vs -30.8% for LOMA (target: $8). BBAR is the only dividend payer here at 2.04% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricBBAR logoBBARBanco BBVA Argent…LOMA logoLOMALoma Negra Compañ…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$16.00$8.10
# AnalystsCovering analysts36
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.0%+0.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$443.65$0.03
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
BBAR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

BBAR leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LOMA leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallBanco BBVA Argentina S.A. (BBAR)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BBAR vs LOMA: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BBAR or LOMA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA) is the stronger pick with 41.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -31. 1% for Banco BBVA Argentina S. A. (BBAR). Banco BBVA Argentina S. A. (BBAR) offers the better valuation at 12. 6x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Banco BBVA Argentina S. A. (BBAR) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BBAR or LOMA?

On trailing P/E, Banco BBVA Argentina S.

A. (BBAR) is the cheapest at 12. 6x versus Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima at 70. 2x. On forward P/E, Banco BBVA Argentina S. A. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BBAR or LOMA?

Over the past 5 years, Banco BBVA Argentina S.

A. (BBAR) delivered a total return of +582. 7%, compared to +136. 3% for Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BBAR returned -7. 3% versus LOMA's -34. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BBAR or LOMA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

50β versus Banco BBVA Argentina S. A. 's 2. 02β — meaning BBAR is approximately 35% more volatile than LOMA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Banco BBVA Argentina S. A. (BBAR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 28% for Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BBAR or LOMA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA) is pulling ahead at 41.

3% versus -31. 1% for Banco BBVA Argentina S. A. (BBAR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Banco BBVA Argentina S. A. grew EPS -1. 4% year-over-year, compared to -96. 5% for Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BBAR or LOMA?

Banco BBVA Argentina S.

A. (BBAR) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 9% net margin versus 2. 8% for Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LOMA leads at 9. 6% versus 8. 5% for BBAR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BBAR leads at 65. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BBAR or LOMA more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Banco BBVA Argentina S.

A. (BBAR) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 0. 0x for Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima — 0. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBAR: 2. 4% to $16. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BBAR or LOMA?

In this comparison, BBAR (2.

0% yield) pays a dividend. LOMA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BBAR or LOMA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Banco BBVA Argentina S.

A. (BBAR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BBAR: -7. 3%, LOMA: -34. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BBAR and LOMA?

These companies operate in different sectors (BBAR (Financial Services) and LOMA (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BBAR is a small-cap deep-value stock; LOMA is a small-cap high-growth stock. BBAR pays a dividend while LOMA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

BBAR

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LOMA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BBAR and LOMA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BBAR: -31.1% · LOMA: 6.7%)
Net Margin>
%
(BBAR: 6.9% · LOMA: 2.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(BBAR: 12.6x · LOMA: 70.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.