Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BBBY vs M vs KSS vs TJX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Department Stores
Department Stores
Apparel - Retail
BBBY vs M vs KSS vs TJX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Department Stores | Department Stores | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $388M | $5.34B | $1.61B | $171.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.06B | $22.62B | $15.53B | $60.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-61M | $642M | $271M | $5.49B |
| Gross Margin | 24.8% | 36.5% | 36.1% | 31.1% |
| Operating Margin | -5.3% | 4.6% | 3.3% | 12.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.8x | 10.3x | 33.0x |
| Total Debt | $22M | $5.20B | $2.45B | $22.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $175M | $1.25B | $674M | $6.23B |
BBBY vs M vs KSS vs TJX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bed Bath & Beyond I… (BBBY) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
| Macy's, Inc. (M) | 100 | 302.4 | +202.4% |
| Kohl's Corporation (KSS) | 100 | 74.7 | -25.3% |
| The TJX Companies, … (TJX) | 100 | 292.8 | +192.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BBBY vs M vs KSS vs TJX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BBBY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
M is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.42, yield 3.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.42, current ratio 1.49x
- Beta 1.42, yield 3.7%, current ratio 1.49x
- Lower P/E (8.8x vs 33.0x)
KSS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +127.8% vs TJX's +21.4%
TJX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 7.1%, EPS growth 14.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.5%
- 322.5% 10Y total return vs M's -24.5%
- 7.1% revenue growth vs BBBY's -25.1%
- 9.1% margin vs BBBY's -5.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.1% revenue growth vs BBBY's -25.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 33.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.1% margin vs BBBY's -5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs BBBY's 3.12 | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs TJX's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +127.8% vs TJX's +21.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.4% ROA vs BBBY's -15.3%, ROIC 25.5% vs -91.0% |
BBBY vs M vs KSS vs TJX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BBBY vs M vs KSS vs TJX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TJX leads in 4 of 6 categories
KSS leads 1 • BBBY leads 0 • M leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TJX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TJX is the larger business by revenue, generating $60.4B annually — 56.9x BBBY's $1.1B. TJX is the more profitable business, keeping 9.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBBY's -5.8%. On growth, TJX holds the edge at +8.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $22.6B | $15.5B | $60.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$36M | $1.9B | $1.2B | $8.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$61M | $642M | $271M | $5.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$76M | $1.1B | $1.2B | $4.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +36.5% | +36.1% | +31.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | +4.6% | +3.3% | +12.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | +2.8% | +1.7% | +9.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.2% | +4.7% | +7.5% | +8.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.9% | -1.1% | -4.2% | +8.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +67.7% | +51.2% | +153.5% | +28.5% |
Valuation Metrics
KSS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.1x trailing earnings, KSS trades at a 81% valuation discount to TJX's 31.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KSS's 2.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TJX's 22.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $388M | $5.3B | $1.6B | $171.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $235M | $9.3B | $3.4B | $187.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.80x | 8.29x | 6.06x | 31.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.79x | 10.26x | 32.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 4.83x | 2.80x | 22.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.37x | 0.24x | 0.10x | 2.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.48x | 1.09x | 0.41x | 17.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.05x | 1.46x | 35.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TJX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TJX delivers a 53.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $54 in annual profit, vs $-32 for BBBY. BBBY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TJX's 2.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), M scores 7/9 vs BBBY's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -32.4% | +14.2% | +6.9% | +53.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.3% | +4.0% | +2.0% | +15.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -91.0% | +8.7% | +4.6% | +25.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -29.8% | +8.7% | +4.8% | +33.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 1.07x | 0.61x | 2.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$153M | $4.0B | $1.8B | $16.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $175M | $1.2B | $674M | $6.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22M | $5.2B | $2.5B | $22.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 10.62x | 2.17x | 133.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TJX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TJX five years ago would be worth $21,851 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $666 for BBBY. Over the past 12 months, KSS leads with a +127.8% total return vs TJX's +21.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TJX at 26.6% vs BBBY's -35.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.3% | -14.6% | -32.1% | +0.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +40.3% | +72.1% | +127.8% | +21.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.0% | +41.5% | -9.7% | +102.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.3% | +26.9% | -64.8% | +118.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.2% | -24.5% | -25.3% | +322.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.4% | +12.3% | -3.3% | +26.6% |
Risk & Volatility
TJX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TJX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBBY's 3.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TJX currently trades 93.2% from its 52-week high vs BBBY's 42.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.12x | 1.42x | 2.32x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.65 | $24.41 | $25.22 | $165.82 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.74 | $10.54 | $6.47 | $119.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.4% | +78.8% | +56.9% | +93.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.1 | 56.6 | 50.7 | 43.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 6.6M | 4.6M | 4.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — M and TJX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BBBY as "Hold", M as "Hold", KSS as "Hold", TJX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.6% upside for BBBY (target: $8) vs -0.2% for M (target: $19). For income investors, M offers the higher dividend yield at 3.71% vs TJX's 1.06%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.75 | $19.20 | $18.00 | $172.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 41 | 40 | 39 | 53 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.7% | +3.4% | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.71 | $0.49 | $1.64 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +4.7% | 0.0% | +1.5% |
TJX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KSS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BBBY vs M vs KSS vs TJX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BBBY or M or KSS or TJX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The TJX Companies, Inc.
(TJX) is the stronger pick with 7. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 1% for Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY). Kohl's Corporation (KSS) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The TJX Companies, Inc. (TJX) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BBBY or M or KSS or TJX?
On trailing P/E, Kohl's Corporation (KSS) is the cheapest at 6.
1x versus The TJX Companies, Inc. at 31. 7x. On forward P/E, Macy's, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BBBY or M or KSS or TJX?
Over the past 5 years, The TJX Companies, Inc.
(TJX) delivered a total return of +118. 5%, compared to -93. 3% for Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TJX returned +322. 5% versus BBBY's -48. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BBBY or M or KSS or TJX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The TJX Companies, Inc.
(TJX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. 's 3. 12β — meaning BBBY is approximately 693% more volatile than TJX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 2% for The TJX Companies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BBBY or M or KSS or TJX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The TJX Companies, Inc.
(TJX) is pulling ahead at 7. 1% versus -25. 1% for Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kohl's Corporation grew EPS 144. 3% year-over-year, compared to 12. 1% for Macy's, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TJX leads at 6. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BBBY or M or KSS or TJX?
The TJX Companies, Inc.
(TJX) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 1% net margin versus -8. 1% for Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TJX leads at 11. 9% versus -5. 9% for BBBY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — M leads at 36. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BBBY or M or KSS or TJX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Macy's, Inc.
(M) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 33. 0x for The TJX Companies, Inc. — 24. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBBY: 44. 6% to $7. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — BBBY or M or KSS or TJX?
In this comparison, M (3.
7% yield), KSS (3. 4% yield), TJX (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. BBBY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BBBY or M or KSS or TJX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The TJX Companies, Inc.
(TJX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), 1. 1% yield, +322. 5% 10Y return). Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. (BBBY) carries a higher beta of 3. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TJX: +322. 5%, BBBY: -48. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BBBY and M and KSS and TJX?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BBBY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; M is a small-cap deep-value stock; KSS is a small-cap deep-value stock; TJX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. M, KSS, TJX pay a dividend while BBBY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.