Broadcasting
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BBGI vs GTN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Broadcasting
BBGI vs GTN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Broadcasting | Broadcasting |
| Market Cap | $31M | $536M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $206M | $3.10B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-197M | $-85M |
| Gross Margin | 28.8% | 96.6% |
| Operating Margin | -2.4% | 12.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 2.3x |
| Total Debt | $271M | $71M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $368M |
BBGI vs GTN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beasley Broadcast G… (BBGI) | 100 | 36.4 | -63.6% |
| Gray Media, Inc. (GTN) | 100 | 39.7 | -60.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BBGI vs GTN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BBGI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -14.3%, EPS growth -28.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.0%
- -14.3% revenue growth vs GTN's -15.1%
- +208.0% vs GTN's +52.3%
GTN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.54, yield 6.2%
- -47.1% 10Y total return vs BBGI's -78.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.54, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 1.27x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -14.3% revenue growth vs GTN's -15.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | -2.7% margin vs BBGI's -95.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.54 vs BBGI's 3.23 | |
| Dividends | 6.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +208.0% vs GTN's +52.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.8% ROA vs BBGI's -40.4%, ROIC 5.7% vs -1.2% |
BBGI vs GTN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BBGI vs GTN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 15.0x BBGI's $206M. GTN is the more profitable business, keeping -2.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBGI's -95.4%. On growth, BBGI holds the edge at -21.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $206M | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1M | $571M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$197M | -$85M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $61M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.8% | +96.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +12.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -95.4% | -2.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +2.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.2% | -24.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -89.1% | -89.9% |
Valuation Metrics
GTN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GTN's 0.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BBGI's 198.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $31M | $536M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $292M | $239M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.16x | -6.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 2.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 198.18x | 0.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.15x | 0.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GTN leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GTN delivers a -3.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-4 in annual profit, vs $-2 for BBGI. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GTN scores 5/9 vs BBGI's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | -3.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -40.4% | -0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.2% | +5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.3% | +3.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $261M | -$297M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $368M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $271M | $71M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.25x | 1.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BBGI and GTN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BBGI five years ago would be worth $3,450 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,220 for GTN. Over the past 12 months, BBGI leads with a +208.0% total return vs GTN's +52.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GTN at -3.8% vs BBGI's -6.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +235.0% | +16.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +208.0% | +52.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.9% | -11.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.5% | -67.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.0% | -47.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.3% | -3.8% |
Risk & Volatility
GTN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTN is the less volatile stock with a 1.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBGI's 3.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTN currently trades 86.0% from its 52-week high vs BBGI's 65.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.23x | 1.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.37 | $6.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.13 | $3.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.4% | +86.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.6 | 51.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
GTN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
GTN is the only dividend payer here at 6.15% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +6.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.34 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% |
GTN leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
BBGI vs GTN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BBGI or GTN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc.
(BBGI) is the stronger pick with -14. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 1% for Gray Media, Inc. (GTN). Analysts rate Gray Media, Inc. (GTN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BBGI or GTN?
Over the past 5 years, Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc.
(BBGI) delivered a total return of -65. 5%, compared to -67. 8% for Gray Media, Inc. (GTN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTN returned -47. 1% versus BBGI's -78. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BBGI or GTN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gray Media, Inc.
(GTN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 54β versus Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. 's 3. 23β — meaning BBGI is approximately 110% more volatile than GTN relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — BBGI or GTN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc.
(BBGI) is pulling ahead at -14. 3% versus -15. 1% for Gray Media, Inc. (GTN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gray Media, Inc. grew EPS -126. 2% year-over-year, compared to -28. 3% for Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTN leads at -5. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BBGI or GTN?
Gray Media, Inc.
(GTN) is the more profitable company, earning -2. 7% net margin versus -95. 4% for Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps -2. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GTN leads at 12. 7% versus -2. 4% for BBGI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GTN leads at 96. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BBGI or GTN?
In this comparison, GTN (6.
2% yield) pays a dividend. BBGI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is BBGI or GTN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gray Media, Inc.
(GTN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (6. 2% yield). Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. (BBGI) carries a higher beta of 3. 23 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTN: -47. 1%, BBGI: -78. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BBGI and GTN?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BBGI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GTN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. GTN pays a dividend while BBGI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 57%
- Dividend Yield > 2.4%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.