Broadcasting
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BBGI vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs FUBO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Internet Content & Information
Broadcasting
BBGI vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs FUBO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Broadcasting | Entertainment | Internet Content & Information | Broadcasting |
| Market Cap | $32M | $374.00B | $4.81T | $317M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $206M | $45.18B | $422.57B | $2.72B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-197M | $10.98B | $160.21B | $156M |
| Gross Margin | 28.8% | 48.5% | 60.4% | 11.1% |
| Operating Margin | -2.4% | 29.5% | 32.7% | -2.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 24.8x | 29.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $271M | $14.46B | $59.29B | $670M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $9.03B | $30.71B | $452M |
BBGI vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs FUBO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beasley Broadcast G… (BBGI) | 100 | 36.8 | -63.2% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 210.3 | +110.3% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) | 100 | 555.2 | +455.2% |
| fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) | 100 | 7.8 | -92.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BBGI vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs FUBO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BBGI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +214.0% vs FUBO's -65.6%
NFLX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency and defensive is your priority.
- PEG 0.75 vs GOOGL's 0.99
- Beta 0.39, current ratio 1.19x
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.39 vs BBGI's 3.23
GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.26, yield 0.2%
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs NFLX's 8.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 14.3%, current ratio 2.01x
- 37.9% margin vs BBGI's -95.4%
FUBO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 67.7%, EPS growth 96.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.2%
- 67.7% revenue growth vs BBGI's -14.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 67.7% revenue growth vs BBGI's -14.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs BBGI's -95.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs BBGI's 3.23 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +214.0% vs FUBO's -65.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs BBGI's -40.4%, ROIC 25.1% vs -1.2% |
BBGI vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs FUBO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BBGI vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs FUBO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GOOGL leads in 3 of 6 categories
NFLX leads 1 • BBGI leads 0 • FUBO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 2051.9x BBGI's $206M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBGI's -95.4%. On growth, FUBO holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $206M | $45.2B | $422.6B | $2.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1M | $30.1B | $161.3B | -$14M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$197M | $11.0B | $160.2B | $156M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $9.5B | $73.3B | -$81M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.8% | +48.5% | +60.4% | +11.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +29.5% | +32.7% | -2.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -95.4% | +24.3% | +37.9% | +5.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +20.9% | +17.3% | -3.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.2% | +17.6% | +21.8% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -89.1% | +31.1% | +81.9% | +81.8% |
Valuation Metrics
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.9x trailing earnings, NFLX trades at a 5% valuation discount to GOOGL's 36.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NFLX offers better value at 1.06x vs GOOGL's 1.23x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $32M | $374.0B | $4.81T | $317M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $292M | $379.4B | $4.84T | $534M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.16x | 34.89x | 36.82x | -44.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.80x | 29.61x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x | 1.23x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 198.44x | 12.61x | 32.22x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.15x | 8.28x | 11.95x | 0.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 14.32x | 11.72x | 0.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 39.53x | 65.72x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — NFLX and GOOGL each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-2 for BBGI. GOOGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFLX's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFLX scores 7/9 vs BBGI's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | +41.3% | +39.0% | +16.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -40.4% | +19.8% | +27.4% | +8.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.2% | +29.8% | +25.1% | -3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.3% | +30.5% | +30.3% | -4.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.54x | 0.14x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $261M | $5.4B | $28.6B | $218M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $9.0B | $30.7B | $452M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $271M | $14.5B | $59.3B | $670M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.25x | 17.33x | 392.15x | 10.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOGL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $33,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $521 for FUBO. Over the past 12 months, BBGI leads with a +214.0% total return vs FUBO's -65.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 54.8% vs FUBO's -21.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +239.0% | -3.0% | +26.4% | -65.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +214.0% | -23.6% | +163.5% | -65.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.9% | +166.5% | +270.8% | -51.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.8% | +75.2% | +239.8% | -94.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.6% | +875.3% | +996.1% | -90.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.0% | +38.6% | +54.8% | -21.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NFLX and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBGI's 3.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs FUBO's 19.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.23x | 0.39x | 1.26x | 1.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.37 | $134.12 | $400.10 | $56.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.13 | $75.01 | $147.84 | $2.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.2% | +65.8% | +99.5% | +19.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.6 | 35.3 | 83.4 | 38.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 44.0M | 28.3M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
GOOGL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NFLX as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy", FUBO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 299.3% upside for FUBO (target: $43) vs 2.1% for GOOGL (target: $406). GOOGL is the only dividend payer here at 0.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $116.29 | $406.28 | $43.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 99 | 82 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.82 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +2.4% | +0.9% | 0.0% |
GOOGL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). NFLX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BBGI vs NFLX vs GOOGL vs FUBO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BBGI or NFLX or GOOGL or FUBO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, fuboTV Inc.
(FUBO) is the stronger pick with 67. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 3% for Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. (BBGI). Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) offers the better valuation at 34. 9x trailing P/E (24. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BBGI or NFLX or GOOGL or FUBO?
On trailing P/E, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the cheapest at 34. 9x versus Alphabet Inc. at 36. 8x. On forward P/E, Netflix, Inc. is actually cheaper at 24. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Netflix, Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Alphabet Inc. 's 0. 99x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BBGI or NFLX or GOOGL or FUBO?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +239. 8%, compared to -94. 8% for fuboTV Inc. (FUBO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOGL returned +996. 1% versus FUBO's -90. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BBGI or NFLX or GOOGL or FUBO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. 's 3. 23β — meaning BBGI is approximately 731% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 54% for Netflix, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BBGI or NFLX or GOOGL or FUBO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), fuboTV Inc.
(FUBO) is pulling ahead at 67. 7% versus -14. 3% for Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. (BBGI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: fuboTV Inc. grew EPS 96. 3% year-over-year, compared to -28. 3% for Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUBO leads at 39. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BBGI or NFLX or GOOGL or FUBO?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus -95. 4% for Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GOOGL leads at 32. 1% versus -2. 6% for FUBO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOOGL leads at 59. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BBGI or NFLX or GOOGL or FUBO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Alphabet Inc. 's 0. 99x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) trades at 24. 8x forward P/E versus 29. 6x for Alphabet Inc. — 4. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FUBO: 299. 3% to $43. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BBGI or NFLX or GOOGL or FUBO?
In this comparison, GOOGL (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. BBGI, NFLX, FUBO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BBGI or NFLX or GOOGL or FUBO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). Beasley Broadcast Group, Inc. (BBGI) carries a higher beta of 3. 23 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, BBGI: -78. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BBGI and NFLX and GOOGL and FUBO?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BBGI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock; FUBO is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.