Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BBU vs CG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
BBU vs CG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $2.79B | $17.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $27.57B | $4.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-14M | $809M |
| Gross Margin | 19.3% | 65.9% |
| Operating Margin | 15.1% | 26.2% |
| Forward P/E | 18.3x | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $43.67B | $13.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.54B | $3.21B |
BBU vs CG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brookfield Business… (BBU) | 100 | 159.2 | +59.2% |
| The Carlyle Group I… (CG) | 100 | 188.0 | +88.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BBU vs CG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BBU is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.33, yield 2.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.33, current ratio 1.83x
- Beta 1.33 vs CG's 1.88
CG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.8%, EPS growth -21.3%
- 281.0% 10Y total return vs BBU's 108.2%
- Beta 1.88, yield 2.8%, current ratio 15.72x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.8% NII/revenue growth vs BBU's -31.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.4x vs 18.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.5% margin vs BBU's -0.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.33 vs CG's 1.88 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, vs BBU's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +48.7% vs CG's +26.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.1% ROA vs BBU's -0.0%, ROIC 5.2% vs 5.8% |
BBU vs CG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BBU vs CG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CG leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BBU is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.6B annually — 5.6x CG's $4.9B. CG is the more profitable business, keeping 16.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBU's -0.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $27.6B | $4.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6.5B | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$14M | $809M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.2B | -$1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.3% | +65.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.1% | +26.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | +16.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +27.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +76.2% | +68.4% |
Valuation Metrics
BBU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, BBU's 5.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CG's 21.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $17.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $39.4B | $28.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -62.92x | 22.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.35x | 11.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.28x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.13x | 21.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.07x | 3.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.14x | 2.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.85x | 12.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CG leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CG delivers a 12.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-0 for BBU. CG carries lower financial leverage with a 1.97x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BBU's 2.86x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.1% | +12.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.0% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | +5.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | +5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.86x | 1.97x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $40.1B | $10.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.5B | $3.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $43.7B | $13.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.15x | 2.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CG five years ago would be worth $12,341 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,496 for BBU. Over the past 12 months, BBU leads with a +48.7% total return vs CG's +26.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CG at 26.8% vs BBU's 23.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.0% | -18.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +48.7% | +26.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.9% | +103.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.0% | +23.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +108.2% | +281.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.2% | +26.8% |
Risk & Volatility
BBU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BBU is the less volatile stock with a 1.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CG's 1.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BBU currently trades 83.3% from its 52-week high vs CG's 70.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 1.88x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.75 | $69.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.07 | $39.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.3% | +70.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.2 | 55.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 47K | 3.2M |
Analyst Outlook
CG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BBU as "Buy" and CG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 37.4% upside for CG (target: $67) vs 33.5% for BBU (target: $42). For income investors, CG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.78% vs BBU's 2.20%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $42.00 | $67.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.61 | $1.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | +3.9% |
CG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BBU leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
BBU vs CG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BBU or CG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Carlyle Group Inc.
(CG) is the stronger pick with 19. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -31. 2% for Brookfield Business Partners L. P. (BBU). The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG) offers the better valuation at 22. 5x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brookfield Business Partners L. P. (BBU) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BBU or CG?
On forward P/E, The Carlyle Group Inc.
is actually cheaper at 11. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BBU or CG?
Over the past 5 years, The Carlyle Group Inc.
(CG) delivered a total return of +23. 4%, compared to +5. 0% for Brookfield Business Partners L. P. (BBU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CG returned +281. 0% versus BBU's +108. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BBU or CG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brookfield Business Partners L.
P. (BBU) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 33β versus The Carlyle Group Inc. 's 1. 88β — meaning CG is approximately 41% more volatile than BBU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 197% versus 3% for Brookfield Business Partners L. P. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BBU or CG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Carlyle Group Inc.
(CG) is pulling ahead at 19. 8% versus -31. 2% for Brookfield Business Partners L. P. (BBU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brookfield Business Partners L. P. grew EPS 38. 0% year-over-year, compared to -21. 3% for The Carlyle Group Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BBU or CG?
The Carlyle Group Inc.
(CG) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 5% net margin versus -0. 1% for Brookfield Business Partners L. P. — meaning it keeps 16. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CG leads at 26. 2% versus 15. 1% for BBU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CG leads at 65. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BBU or CG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Carlyle Group Inc.
(CG) trades at 11. 4x forward P/E versus 18. 3x for Brookfield Business Partners L. P. — 6. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CG: 37. 4% to $67. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — BBU or CG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 2. 2% for Brookfield Business Partners L. P. (BBU).
09Is BBU or CG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Brookfield Business Partners L.
P. (BBU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 2% yield, +108. 2% 10Y return). The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG) carries a higher beta of 1. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BBU: +108. 2%, CG: +281. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BBU and CG?
These companies operate in different sectors (BBU (Industrials) and CG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BBU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.