Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BBY vs TGT vs WMT vs COST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Discount Stores
Specialty Retail
Discount Stores
BBY vs TGT vs WMT vs COST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Discount Stores | Specialty Retail | Discount Stores |
| Market Cap | $12.29B | $57.36B | $1.04T | $448.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $41.69B | $106.25B | $703.06B | $286.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.07B | $4.04B | $22.91B | $8.55B |
| Gross Margin | 22.5% | 27.3% | 24.9% | 12.9% |
| Operating Margin | 3.3% | 5.3% | 4.1% | 3.8% |
| Forward P/E | 9.0x | 15.7x | 44.7x | 49.5x |
| Total Debt | $4.13B | $5.59B | $67.09B | $8.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.74B | $5.49B | $10.73B | $14.16B |
BBY vs TGT vs WMT vs COST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best Buy Co., Inc. (BBY) | 100 | 75.0 | -25.0% |
| Target Corporation (TGT) | 100 | 102.9 | +2.9% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.9 | +214.9% |
| Costco Wholesale Co… (COST) | 100 | 328.1 | +228.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BBY vs TGT vs WMT vs COST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BBY has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in defensive.
- Beta 1.08, yield 6.5%, current ratio 1.11x
- Lower P/E (9.0x vs 44.7x)
- 6.5% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%
TGT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and momentum is your priority.
- 3.8% margin vs BBY's 2.6%
- +36.6% vs BBY's -8.8%
WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- Beta 0.12 vs BBY's 1.08, lower leverage
COST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.2%, EPS growth 10.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.6%
- 6.2% 10Y total return vs WMT's 499.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 28.0%, current ratio 1.03x
- PEG 3.28 vs WMT's 4.06
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.2% revenue growth vs TGT's -1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.0x vs 44.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.8% margin vs BBY's 2.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs BBY's 1.08, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.6% vs BBY's -8.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.7% ROA vs TGT's 6.9%, ROIC 34.5% vs 16.7% |
BBY vs TGT vs WMT vs COST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BBY vs TGT vs WMT vs COST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WMT leads in 2 of 6 categories
TGT leads 1 • BBY leads 1 • COST leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TGT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 16.9x BBY's $41.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.8% (TGT) to 2.6% (BBY). On growth, COST holds the edge at +9.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $41.7B | $106.2B | $703.1B | $286.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.9B | $8.7B | $42.8B | $13.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $4.0B | $22.9B | $8.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.3B | $2.9B | $15.3B | $9.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +27.3% | +24.9% | +12.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +5.3% | +4.1% | +3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +3.8% | +3.3% | +3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +2.8% | +2.2% | +3.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.0% | +3.2% | +5.8% | +9.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.7% | +23.7% | +35.1% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
BBY leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.6x trailing earnings, BBY trades at a 79% valuation discount to COST's 55.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), COST offers better value at 3.68x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.3B | $57.4B | $1.04T | $448.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.7B | $57.5B | $1.09T | $442.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.62x | 15.49x | 47.69x | 55.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.03x | 15.74x | 44.71x | 49.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.33x | 3.68x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.62x | 7.26x | 24.85x | 34.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.29x | 0.55x | 1.46x | 1.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.56x | 3.55x | 10.45x | 15.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.77x | 20.23x | 24.97x | 57.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
COST leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BBY delivers a 36.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $22 for WMT. COST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BBY's 1.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BBY scores 7/9 vs WMT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +36.8% | +26.1% | +22.3% | +28.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.0% | +6.9% | +7.9% | +10.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.7% | +16.7% | +14.7% | +34.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.2% | +13.6% | +17.5% | +27.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.18x | 0.35x | 0.67x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.4B | $104M | $56.4B | -$6.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.7B | $5.5B | $10.7B | $14.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.1B | $5.6B | $67.1B | $8.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 19.90x | 12.40x | 11.85x | 77.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,242 for BBY. Over the past 12 months, TGT leads with a +36.6% total return vs BBY's -8.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs TGT's -3.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.0% | +26.4% | +15.7% | +18.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -8.8% | +36.6% | +32.7% | +1.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.6% | -11.0% | +160.5% | +108.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.6% | -31.6% | +186.9% | +172.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +161.1% | +99.5% | +499.5% | +625.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.2% | -3.8% | +37.6% | +27.8% |
Risk & Volatility
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBY's 1.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs BBY's 68.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 0.95x | 0.12x | 0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $84.99 | $133.07 | $134.69 | $1067.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $56.68 | $83.44 | $91.89 | $846.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.9% | +94.6% | +96.7% | +94.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.2 | 61.4 | 55.9 | 47.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.2M | 4.5M | 17.2M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BBY and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BBY as "Hold", TGT as "Hold", WMT as "Buy", COST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.3% upside for BBY (target: $75) vs -8.4% for TGT (target: $115). For income investors, BBY offers the higher dividend yield at 6.45% vs COST's 0.48%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $74.50 | $115.31 | $137.04 | $1070.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 41 | 59 | 64 | 58 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.5% | +3.6% | +0.7% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 22 | 37 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.78 | $4.51 | $0.94 | $4.91 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +0.7% | +0.8% | +0.2% |
WMT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). TGT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
BBY vs TGT vs WMT vs COST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BBY or TGT or WMT or COST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is the stronger pick with 8.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Target Corporation (TGT). Best Buy Co. , Inc. (BBY) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BBY or TGT or WMT or COST?
On trailing P/E, Best Buy Co.
, Inc. (BBY) is the cheapest at 11. 6x versus Costco Wholesale Corporation at 55. 6x. On forward P/E, Best Buy Co. , Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Costco Wholesale Corporation wins at 3. 28x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BBY or TGT or WMT or COST?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -37. 6% for Best Buy Co. , Inc. (BBY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COST returned +625. 0% versus TGT's +99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BBY or TGT or WMT or COST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Best Buy Co. , Inc. 's 1. 08β — meaning BBY is approximately 824% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 118% for Best Buy Co. , Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BBY or TGT or WMT or COST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is pulling ahead at 8.
2% versus -1. 7% for Target Corporation (TGT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Best Buy Co. , Inc. grew EPS 17. 8% year-over-year, compared to -8. 2% for Target Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, COST leads at 6. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BBY or TGT or WMT or COST?
Target Corporation (TGT) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
5% net margin versus 2. 6% for Best Buy Co. , Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TGT leads at 4. 9% versus 3. 3% for BBY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TGT leads at 27. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BBY or TGT or WMT or COST more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 28x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Best Buy Co. , Inc. (BBY) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 49. 5x for Costco Wholesale Corporation — 40. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBY: 27. 3% to $74. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — BBY or TGT or WMT or COST?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Best Buy Co. , Inc. (BBY) offers the highest yield at 6. 5%, versus 0. 5% for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
09Is BBY or TGT or WMT or COST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, BBY: +161. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BBY and TGT and WMT and COST?
These companies operate in different sectors (BBY (Consumer Cyclical) and TGT (Consumer Defensive) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and COST (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BBY is a mid-cap deep-value stock; TGT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; COST is a large-cap quality compounder stock. BBY, TGT, WMT pay a dividend while COST does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.