BC
Brunswick Corporation
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
Market Cap$5.30B
5Y Perf.+13.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
BC vs MBC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MBC
MasterBrand, Inc.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Market Cap$987M
5Y Perf.-5.1%
BC vs MBC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | BC | MBC |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Recreational Vehicles | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $5.30B | $987M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.52B | $2.69B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-137M | $-2M |
| Gross Margin | 18.0% | 28.1% |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | 2.6% |
| Forward P/E | 19.2x | 23.4x |
| Total Debt | $2.43B | $1.35B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $275M | $183M |
BC vs MBC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
BC
MBC
| Stock | Dec 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brunswick Corporati… (BC) | 100 | 113.0 | +13.0% |
| MasterBrand, Inc. (MBC) | 100 | 102.1 | +2.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BC vs MBC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: BC leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. MasterBrand, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BC
Brunswick Corporation
The Income Pick
BC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 1.69, yield 2.1%
- Rev growth 2.4%, EPS growth -207.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.7%
- 98.2% 10Y total return vs MBC's -22.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
MBC
MasterBrand, Inc.
The Defensive Pick
MBC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.63, current ratio 1.67x
- Beta 1.63, current ratio 1.67x
- -0.1% margin vs BC's -2.5%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BC | 2.4% revenue growth vs MBC's 1.3% |
| Value | BC | Lower P/E (19.2x vs 23.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | MBC | -0.1% margin vs BC's -2.5% |
| Stability / Safety | MBC | Beta 1.63 vs BC's 1.69, lower leverage |
| Dividends | BC | 2.1% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | BC | +82.2% vs MBC's -35.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MBC | -0.1% ROA vs BC's -2.5%, ROIC 4.2% vs -0.8% |
BC vs MBC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
BC vs MBC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLBCLAGGINGMBC
MBCMasterBrand, Inc.
2leads
BCBrunswick Corporation
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MBCMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
BC4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
MBC4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MBC8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
BC6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
BC1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BC is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.5B annually — 2.0x MBC's $2.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -0.1% (MBC) to -2.5% (BC). On growth, BC holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BCBrunswick Corpora… | MBCMasterBrand, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.5B | $2.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $511M | $140M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$137M | -$2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $341M | $13M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +28.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +2.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | -0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +0.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.8% | -6.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | -2.2% |
BC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
MBC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MBC's 9.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BC's 29.5x.
| Metric | BCBrunswick Corpora… | MBCMasterBrand, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.3B | $987M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.5B | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -39.16x | 36.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.15x | 23.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.49x | 9.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.99x | 0.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.29x | 0.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.38x | 8.40x |
MBC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MBC leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MBC delivers a -0.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-0 in annual profit, vs $-5 for BC. MBC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BC's 1.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MBC scores 5/9 vs BC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | BCBrunswick Corpora… | MBCMasterBrand, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.1% | -0.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.5% | -0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.8% | +4.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.0% | +5.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.49x | 1.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.2B | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $275M | $183M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.4B | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.34x | 1.11x |
MBC leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BC five years ago would be worth $7,758 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,710 for MBC. Over the past 12 months, BC leads with a +82.2% total return vs MBC's -35.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BC at 1.5% vs MBC's -2.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BCBrunswick Corpora… | MBCMasterBrand, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.9% | -31.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +82.2% | -35.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.6% | -8.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.4% | -22.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.2% | -22.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.5% | -2.8% |
BC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BC and MBC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MBC is the less volatile stock with a 1.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BC's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BC currently trades 90.3% from its 52-week high vs MBC's 54.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BCBrunswick Corpora… | MBCMasterBrand, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.69x | 1.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $90.23 | $14.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $45.44 | $7.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.3% | +54.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.1 | 41.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 901K | 2.2M |
Evenly matched — BC and MBC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
BC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BC as "Buy" and MBC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 107.5% upside for MBC (target: $16) vs 9.0% for BC (target: $89). BC is the only dividend payer here at 2.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | BCBrunswick Corpora… | MBCMasterBrand, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $88.78 | $16.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 13 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.71 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +1.8% |
BC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
BC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). MBC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
Best OverallBrunswick Corporation (BC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
BC vs MBC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BC or MBC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Brunswick Corporation (BC) is the stronger pick with 2.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 3% for MasterBrand, Inc. (MBC). MasterBrand, Inc. (MBC) offers the better valuation at 36. 7x trailing P/E (23. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brunswick Corporation (BC) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BC or MBC?
On forward P/E, Brunswick Corporation is actually cheaper at 19.
2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BC or MBC?
Over the past 5 years, Brunswick Corporation (BC) delivered a total return of -22.
4%, compared to -22. 9% for MasterBrand, Inc. (MBC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BC returned +98. 2% versus MBC's -22. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BC or MBC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MasterBrand, Inc.
(MBC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 63β versus Brunswick Corporation's 1. 69β — meaning BC is approximately 3% more volatile than MBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MasterBrand, Inc. (MBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 100% versus 149% for Brunswick Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BC or MBC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brunswick Corporation (BC) is pulling ahead at 2.
4% versus 1. 3% for MasterBrand, Inc. (MBC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MasterBrand, Inc. grew EPS -78. 1% year-over-year, compared to -207. 8% for Brunswick Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MBC leads at -5. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BC or MBC?
MasterBrand, Inc.
(MBC) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 0% net margin versus -2. 6% for Brunswick Corporation — meaning it keeps 1. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MBC leads at 4. 9% versus -0. 7% for BC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MBC leads at 30. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BC or MBC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Brunswick Corporation (BC) trades at 19.
2x forward P/E versus 23. 4x for MasterBrand, Inc. — 4. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MBC: 107. 5% to $16. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BC or MBC?
In this comparison, BC (2.
1% yield) pays a dividend. MBC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BC or MBC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Brunswick Corporation (BC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2.
1% yield). MasterBrand, Inc. (MBC) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BC: +98. 2%, MBC: -22. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BC and MBC?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
BC pays a dividend while MBC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(BC: 12.8% · MBC: -6.4%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.