BCC
Boise Cascade Company
Construction Materials
Market Cap$2.59B
5Y Perf.+118.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
BCC vs NEM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
NEM
Newmont Corporation
Gold
Market Cap$120.78B
5Y Perf.+96.9%
BCC vs NEM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | BCC | NEM |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction Materials | Gold |
| Market Cap | $2.59B | $120.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.37B | $17.23B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $110M | $5.26B |
| Gross Margin | 11.2% | 52.1% |
| Operating Margin | 2.5% | 49.3% |
| Forward P/E | 19.7x | 11.0x |
| Total Debt | $522M | $474M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $477M | $7.65B |
BCC vs NEM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
BCC
NEM
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boise Cascade Compa… (BCC) | 100 | 218.2 | +118.2% |
| Newmont Corporation (NEM) | 100 | 196.9 | +96.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BCC vs NEM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: NEM leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Boise Cascade Company is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BCC
Boise Cascade Company
The Long-Run Compounder
BCC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 367.3% 10Y total return vs NEM's 267.2%
- Beta 1.12, yield 1.3%, current ratio 3.36x
- 1.3% yield, vs NEM's 0.9%
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
NEM
Newmont Corporation
The Income Pick
NEM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 0.9%
- Rev growth 19.1%, EPS growth 124.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 1.72x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NEM | 19.1% revenue growth vs BCC's -4.8% |
| Value | NEM | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 19.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | NEM | 30.5% margin vs BCC's 1.7% |
| Stability / Safety | NEM | Beta 0.75 vs BCC's 1.12, lower leverage |
| Dividends | BCC | 1.3% yield, vs NEM's 0.9% |
| Momentum (1Y) | NEM | +107.4% vs BCC's -21.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NEM | 9.4% ROA vs BCC's 4.4%, ROIC 24.9% vs 6.6% |
BCC vs NEM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
BCC vs NEM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLNEMLAGGINGBCC
BCCBoise Cascade Company
0leads
NEMNewmont Corporation
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BCCMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
NEM4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
NEM9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
NEM5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
NEM2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEM is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.2B annually — 2.7x BCC's $6.4B. NEM is the more profitable business, keeping 30.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BCC's 1.7%. On growth, BCC holds the edge at -2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BCCBoise Cascade Com… | NEMNewmont Corporati… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.4B | $17.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $322M | $12.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $110M | $5.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $78M | $12.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +52.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +49.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +30.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | +75.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -52.8% | -100.0% |
NEM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BCC and NEM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.0x trailing earnings, NEM trades at a 17% valuation discount to BCC's 20.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BCC's 7.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NEM's 8.7x.
| Metric | BCCBoise Cascade Com… | NEMNewmont Corporati… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.6B | $120.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $113.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.49x | 17.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.70x | 11.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.79x | 8.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.40x | 5.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.29x | 3.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 203.41x | 16.55x |
Evenly matched — BCC and NEM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NEM leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NEM delivers a 15.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $5 for BCC. NEM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BCC's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NEM scores 9/9 vs BCC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | BCCBoise Cascade Com… | NEMNewmont Corporati… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.3% | +15.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.4% | +9.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.6% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.5% | +20.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $45M | -$7.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $477M | $7.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $522M | $474M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.53x | 50.54x |
NEM leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NEM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NEM five years ago would be worth $18,001 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,120 for BCC. Over the past 12 months, NEM leads with a +107.4% total return vs BCC's -21.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NEM at 32.2% vs BCC's 7.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BCCBoise Cascade Com… | NEMNewmont Corporati… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.4% | +8.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -21.0% | +107.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.9% | +130.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.2% | +80.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +367.3% | +267.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.7% | +32.2% |
NEM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NEM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NEM is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BCC's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NEM currently trades 80.8% from its 52-week high vs BCC's 75.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BCCBoise Cascade Com… | NEMNewmont Corporati… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $95.72 | $134.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $65.14 | $48.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.4% | +80.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.3 | 45.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 398K | 9.2M |
NEM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BCC and NEM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BCC as "Hold" and NEM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.8% upside for BCC (target: $103) vs 26.1% for NEM (target: $138). For income investors, BCC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.30% vs NEM's 0.92%.
| Metric | BCCBoise Cascade Com… | NEMNewmont Corporati… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $103.00 | $137.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.94 | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.1% | +1.9% |
Evenly matched — BCC and NEM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
NEM leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
Best OverallNewmont Corporation (NEM)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
BCC vs NEM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BCC or NEM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the stronger pick with 19.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 8% for Boise Cascade Company (BCC). Newmont Corporation (NEM) offers the better valuation at 17. 0x trailing P/E (11. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Newmont Corporation (NEM) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BCC or NEM?
On trailing P/E, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the cheapest at 17.
0x versus Boise Cascade Company at 20. 5x. On forward P/E, Newmont Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BCC or NEM?
Over the past 5 years, Newmont Corporation (NEM) delivered a total return of +80.
0%, compared to +41. 2% for Boise Cascade Company (BCC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BCC returned +363. 3% versus NEM's +271. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BCC or NEM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
75β versus Boise Cascade Company's 1. 12β — meaning BCC is approximately 48% more volatile than NEM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Newmont Corporation (NEM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 25% for Boise Cascade Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BCC or NEM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Newmont Corporation (NEM) is pulling ahead at 19.
1% versus -4. 8% for Boise Cascade Company (BCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Newmont Corporation grew EPS 124. 1% year-over-year, compared to -63. 2% for Boise Cascade Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, NEM leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BCC or NEM?
Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
1% net margin versus 2. 1% for Boise Cascade Company — meaning it keeps 32. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NEM leads at 46. 9% versus 2. 8% for BCC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NEM leads at 49. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BCC or NEM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Newmont Corporation (NEM) trades at 11.
0x forward P/E versus 19. 7x for Boise Cascade Company — 8. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BCC: 42. 8% to $103. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BCC or NEM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Boise Cascade Company (BCC) offers the highest yield at 1. 3%, versus 0. 9% for Newmont Corporation (NEM).
09Is BCC or NEM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
75), 0. 9% yield, +271. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEM: +271. 4%, BCC: +363. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BCC and NEM?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NEM is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(BCC: -2.5% · NEM: -100.0%)P/E Ratio<
x
(BCC: 20.5x · NEM: 17.0x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.