Construction Materials
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BCC vs WY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Specialty
BCC vs WY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction Materials | REIT - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $2.59B | $17.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.37B | $6.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $110M | $397M |
| Gross Margin | 11.2% | 13.4% |
| Operating Margin | 2.5% | 7.7% |
| Forward P/E | 19.1x | 83.6x |
| Total Debt | $522M | $5.57B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $477M | $464M |
BCC vs WY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boise Cascade Compa… (BCC) | 100 | 212.0 | +112.0% |
| Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) | 100 | 117.4 | +17.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BCC vs WY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BCC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 367.3% 10Y total return vs WY's 14.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 25.2%, current ratio 3.36x
- Lower P/E (19.1x vs 83.6x)
WY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.51, yield 3.5%
- Rev growth -3.1%, EPS growth -16.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -12.1%
- Beta 0.51, yield 3.5%, current ratio 1.29x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -3.1% FFO/revenue growth vs BCC's -4.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.1x vs 83.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.7% margin vs BCC's 1.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs BCC's 1.12 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, vs BCC's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -5.0% vs BCC's -21.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.4% ROA vs WY's 2.4%, ROIC 6.6% vs 2.4% |
BCC vs WY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BCC vs WY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WY and BCC operate at a comparable scale, with $6.9B and $6.4B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.7% (WY) to 1.7% (BCC).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.4B | $6.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $322M | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $110M | $397M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $78M | $516M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +13.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +7.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +5.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | +7.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | -2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -52.8% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BCC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.5x trailing earnings, BCC trades at a 61% valuation discount to WY's 52.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BCC's 7.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WY's 22.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.6B | $17.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $22.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.49x | 52.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.14x | 83.63x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.79x | 22.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.40x | 2.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.29x | 1.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 203.41x | 194.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BCC leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BCC delivers a 5.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $4 for WY. BCC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WY's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BCC scores 5/9 vs WY's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.3% | +4.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.4% | +2.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.6% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.5% | +3.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $45M | $5.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $477M | $464M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $522M | $5.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.53x | 1.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BCC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BCC five years ago would be worth $14,120 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,918 for WY. Over the past 12 months, WY leads with a -5.0% total return vs BCC's -21.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BCC at 7.7% vs WY's -4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.4% | +0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -21.0% | -5.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.9% | -11.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.2% | -20.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +367.3% | +14.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.7% | -4.0% |
Risk & Volatility
WY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WY is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BCC's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WY currently trades 85.1% from its 52-week high vs BCC's 75.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $95.72 | $27.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $65.14 | $21.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.4% | +85.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.3 | 38.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 398K | 5.1M |
Analyst Outlook
WY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BCC as "Hold" and WY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.8% upside for BCC (target: $103) vs 25.9% for WY (target: $30). For income investors, WY offers the higher dividend yield at 3.54% vs BCC's 1.30%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $103.00 | $29.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.94 | $0.84 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.1% | +0.9% |
WY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). BCC leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
BCC vs WY: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BCC or WY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the stronger pick with -3.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 8% for Boise Cascade Company (BCC). Boise Cascade Company (BCC) offers the better valuation at 20. 5x trailing P/E (19. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BCC or WY?
On trailing P/E, Boise Cascade Company (BCC) is the cheapest at 20.
5x versus Weyerhaeuser Company at 52. 7x. On forward P/E, Boise Cascade Company is actually cheaper at 19. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BCC or WY?
Over the past 5 years, Boise Cascade Company (BCC) delivered a total return of +41.
2%, compared to -20. 8% for Weyerhaeuser Company (WY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BCC returned +367. 3% versus WY's +14. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BCC or WY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
51β versus Boise Cascade Company's 1. 12β — meaning BCC is approximately 117% more volatile than WY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Boise Cascade Company (BCC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 59% for Weyerhaeuser Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BCC or WY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is pulling ahead at -3.
1% versus -4. 8% for Boise Cascade Company (BCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Weyerhaeuser Company grew EPS -16. 7% year-over-year, compared to -63. 2% for Boise Cascade Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, BCC leads at -8. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BCC or WY?
Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
7% net margin versus 2. 1% for Boise Cascade Company — meaning it keeps 4. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WY leads at 6. 7% versus 2. 8% for BCC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCC leads at 14. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BCC or WY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Boise Cascade Company (BCC) trades at 19.
1x forward P/E versus 83. 6x for Weyerhaeuser Company — 64. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BCC: 42. 8% to $103. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BCC or WY?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 3% for Boise Cascade Company (BCC).
09Is BCC or WY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WY: +14. 4%, BCC: +367. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BCC and WY?
These companies operate in different sectors (BCC (Basic Materials) and WY (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WY is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.