Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BCC vs WY

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BCC
Boise Cascade Company

Construction Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.59B
5Y Perf.+112.0%
WY
Weyerhaeuser Company

REIT - Specialty

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$17.09B
5Y Perf.+17.4%

BCC vs WY — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BCC logoBCC
WY logoWY
IndustryConstruction MaterialsREIT - Specialty
Market Cap$2.59B$17.09B
Revenue (TTM)$6.37B$6.92B
Net Income (TTM)$110M$397M
Gross Margin11.2%13.4%
Operating Margin2.5%7.7%
Forward P/E19.1x83.6x
Total Debt$522M$5.57B
Cash & Equiv.$477M$464M

BCC vs WYLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BCC
WY
StockMay 20May 26Return
Boise Cascade Compa… (BCC)100212.0+112.0%
Weyerhaeuser Company (WY)100117.4+17.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BCC vs WY

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: WY leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Boise Cascade Company is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and operational efficiency and capital deployment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BCC
Boise Cascade Company
The Long-Run Compounder

BCC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 367.3% 10Y total return vs WY's 14.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 25.2%, current ratio 3.36x
  • Lower P/E (19.1x vs 83.6x)
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
WY
Weyerhaeuser Company
The Real Estate Income Play

WY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.51, yield 3.5%
  • Rev growth -3.1%, EPS growth -16.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -12.1%
  • Beta 0.51, yield 3.5%, current ratio 1.29x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthWY logoWY-3.1% FFO/revenue growth vs BCC's -4.8%
ValueBCC logoBCCLower P/E (19.1x vs 83.6x)
Quality / MarginsWY logoWY5.7% margin vs BCC's 1.7%
Stability / SafetyWY logoWYBeta 0.51 vs BCC's 1.12
DividendsWY logoWY3.5% yield, vs BCC's 1.3%
Momentum (1Y)WY logoWY-5.0% vs BCC's -21.0%
Efficiency (ROA)BCC logoBCC4.4% ROA vs WY's 2.4%, ROIC 6.6% vs 2.4%

BCC vs WY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BCCBoise Cascade Company
FY 2025
Building Materials Distribution
78.6%$5.9B
Wood Products
21.4%$1.6B
WYWeyerhaeuser Company
FY 2025
Wood Products
66.1%$5.0B
Timberlands
27.8%$2.1B
R E E N R
6.1%$454M

BCC vs WY — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBCCLAGGINGWY

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

WY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

WY and BCC operate at a comparable scale, with $6.9B and $6.4B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.7% (WY) to 1.7% (BCC).

MetricBCC logoBCCBoise Cascade Com…WY logoWYWeyerhaeuser Comp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$6.4B$6.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$322M$1.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$110M$397M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$78M$516M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+11.2%+13.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+2.5%+7.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.7%+5.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+1.2%+7.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.5%-2.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-52.8%+100.0%
WY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BCC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 20.5x trailing earnings, BCC trades at a 61% valuation discount to WY's 52.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BCC's 7.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WY's 22.8x.

MetricBCC logoBCCBoise Cascade Com…WY logoWYWeyerhaeuser Comp…
Market CapShares × price$2.6B$17.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.6B$22.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS20.49x52.67x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.14x83.63x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.79x22.79x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.40x2.47x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.29x1.81x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF203.41x194.19x
BCC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BCC leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

BCC delivers a 5.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $4 for WY. BCC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WY's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BCC scores 5/9 vs WY's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricBCC logoBCCBoise Cascade Com…WY logoWYWeyerhaeuser Comp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.3%+4.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.4%+2.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.6%+2.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.5%+3.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.25x0.59x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$45M$5.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$477M$464M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$522M$5.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense13.53x1.95x
BCC leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BCC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BCC five years ago would be worth $14,120 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,918 for WY. Over the past 12 months, WY leads with a -5.0% total return vs BCC's -21.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BCC at 7.7% vs WY's -4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBCC logoBCCBoise Cascade Com…WY logoWYWeyerhaeuser Comp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-2.4%+0.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-21.0%-5.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+24.9%-11.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+41.2%-20.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+367.3%+14.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+7.7%-4.0%
BCC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

WY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

WY is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BCC's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WY currently trades 85.1% from its 52-week high vs BCC's 75.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBCC logoBCCBoise Cascade Com…WY logoWYWeyerhaeuser Comp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.12x0.51x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$95.72$27.86
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$65.14$21.16
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+75.4%+85.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10037.338.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded398K5.1M
WY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

WY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates BCC as "Hold" and WY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.8% upside for BCC (target: $103) vs 25.9% for WY (target: $30). For income investors, WY offers the higher dividend yield at 3.54% vs BCC's 1.30%.

MetricBCC logoBCCBoise Cascade Com…WY logoWYWeyerhaeuser Comp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$103.00$29.83
# AnalystsCovering analysts1225
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.3%+3.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.94$0.84
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+7.1%+0.9%
WY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

WY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). BCC leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).

Best OverallBoise Cascade Company (BCC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BCC vs WY: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BCC or WY a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the stronger pick with -3.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 8% for Boise Cascade Company (BCC). Boise Cascade Company (BCC) offers the better valuation at 20. 5x trailing P/E (19. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BCC or WY?

On trailing P/E, Boise Cascade Company (BCC) is the cheapest at 20.

5x versus Weyerhaeuser Company at 52. 7x. On forward P/E, Boise Cascade Company is actually cheaper at 19. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BCC or WY?

Over the past 5 years, Boise Cascade Company (BCC) delivered a total return of +41.

2%, compared to -20. 8% for Weyerhaeuser Company (WY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BCC returned +367. 3% versus WY's +14. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BCC or WY?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

51β versus Boise Cascade Company's 1. 12β — meaning BCC is approximately 117% more volatile than WY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Boise Cascade Company (BCC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 59% for Weyerhaeuser Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BCC or WY?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is pulling ahead at -3.

1% versus -4. 8% for Boise Cascade Company (BCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Weyerhaeuser Company grew EPS -16. 7% year-over-year, compared to -63. 2% for Boise Cascade Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, BCC leads at -8. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BCC or WY?

Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the more profitable company, earning 4.

7% net margin versus 2. 1% for Boise Cascade Company — meaning it keeps 4. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WY leads at 6. 7% versus 2. 8% for BCC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCC leads at 14. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BCC or WY more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Boise Cascade Company (BCC) trades at 19.

1x forward P/E versus 83. 6x for Weyerhaeuser Company — 64. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BCC: 42. 8% to $103. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BCC or WY?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 3% for Boise Cascade Company (BCC).

09

Is BCC or WY better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

51), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WY: +14. 4%, BCC: +367. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BCC and WY?

These companies operate in different sectors (BCC (Basic Materials) and WY (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WY is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

BCC

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WY

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.4%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BCC and WY on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BCC: -2.5% · WY: -2.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(BCC: 20.5x · WY: 52.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.