Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BCLI vs CLLS vs CRSP vs BEAM vs EDIT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
BCLI vs CLLS vs CRSP vs BEAM vs EDIT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $7M | $279M | $5.29B | $3.32B | $304M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $849K | $75M | $4M | $132M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-35M | $-569M | $-65M | $-160M |
| Gross Margin | 61.5% | 87.6% | -41.7% | -64.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -14.0% | -35.1% | -134.1% | -281.0% | — |
| Forward P/E | 0.3x | — | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $720K | $91M | $395M | $294M | $18M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $187K | $143M | $355M | $295M | $147M |
BCLI vs CLLS vs CRSP vs BEAM vs EDIT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brainstorm Cell The… (BCLI) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
| Cellectis S.A. (CLLS) | 100 | 20.8 | -79.2% |
| CRISPR Therapeutics… (CRSP) | 100 | 84.9 | -15.1% |
| Beam Therapeutics I… (BEAM) | 100 | 126.5 | +26.5% |
| Editas Medicine, In… (EDIT) | 100 | 11.5 | -88.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BCLI vs CLLS vs CRSP vs BEAM vs EDIT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BCLI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- beta 1.05
- Beta 1.05 vs EDIT's 2.45
CLLS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 54.0%, EPS growth 76.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.0%
- 54.0% revenue growth vs EDIT's -100.0%
- -47.0% margin vs CRSP's -138.6%
- +151.6% vs BCLI's -42.9%
CRSP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 289.1% 10Y total return vs BEAM's 72.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.87, Low D/E 20.5%, current ratio 13.32x
- Beta 1.87, current ratio 13.32x
BEAM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.
- -4.6% ROA vs BCLI's -446.1%
Among these 5 stocks, EDIT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 54.0% revenue growth vs EDIT's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | -47.0% margin vs CRSP's -138.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.05 vs EDIT's 2.45 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +151.6% vs BCLI's -42.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -4.6% ROA vs BCLI's -446.1% |
BCLI vs CLLS vs CRSP vs BEAM vs EDIT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BCLI vs CLLS vs CRSP vs BEAM vs EDIT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CLLS leads in 2 of 6 categories
BCLI leads 0 • CRSP leads 0 • BEAM leads 0 • EDIT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLLS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BEAM and EDIT operate at a comparable scale, with $132M and $0 in trailing revenue. CLLS is the more profitable business, keeping -47.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRSP's -138.6%. On growth, CLLS holds the edge at +117.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $849,000 | $75M | $4M | $132M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | -$6M | -$535M | -$355M | $0 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$35M | -$569M | -$65M | -$160M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | -$33M | -$401M | -$384M | -$166M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.5% | +87.6% | -41.7% | -64.2% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -14.0% | -35.1% | -134.1% | -2.8% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.5% | -47.0% | -138.6% | -49.2% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.2% | -43.5% | -97.8% | -2.9% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +117.1% | +68.6% | -100.0% | -151.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.0% | +102.6% | +19.0% | +26.6% | +105.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CLLS and CRSP and BEAM each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $279M | $5.3B | $3.3B | $304M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8M | $228M | $5.3B | $3.3B | $176M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.32x | -9.39x | -8.47x | -39.90x | -1.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.31x | 6.73x | 1506.63x | 23.76x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.66x | 2.57x | 2.58x | 10.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.31x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CRSP and BEAM each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BEAM delivers a -5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-5 for EDIT. CRSP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLLS's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLLS scores 7/9 vs EDIT's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -31.8% | -30.9% | -5.9% | -5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.5% | -9.8% | -24.5% | -4.6% | -74.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -79.6% | -22.3% | -31.1% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -30.0% | -26.6% | -33.3% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.70x | 0.21x | 0.24x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $533,000 | -$52M | $40M | -$1M | -$129M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $187,000 | $143M | $355M | $295M | $147M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $720,000 | $91M | $395M | $294M | $18M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -26.44x | -3.44x | — | 1.08x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLLS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CRSP five years ago would be worth $5,404 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $154 for BCLI. Over the past 12 months, CLLS leads with a +151.6% total return vs BCLI's -42.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLLS at 26.5% vs BCLI's -74.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.3% | -19.8% | +2.0% | +19.1% | +51.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -42.9% | +151.6% | +51.7% | +87.4% | +123.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | +102.6% | -2.0% | -3.1% | -67.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | -74.3% | -46.0% | -49.6% | -90.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -88.5% | +289.1% | +72.4% | -89.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -74.9% | +26.5% | -0.7% | -1.0% | -31.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BCLI and BEAM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BCLI is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EDIT's 2.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BEAM currently trades 88.7% from its 52-week high vs BCLI's 36.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.05x | 1.73x | 1.87x | 2.08x | 2.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.92 | $5.48 | $78.48 | $36.44 | $4.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.46 | $1.33 | $34.12 | $15.35 | $1.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.3% | +70.3% | +69.9% | +88.7% | +68.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.9 | 50.7 | 49.4 | 57.7 | 52.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9K | 42K | 1.9M | 2.0M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CLLS as "Buy", CRSP as "Buy", BEAM as "Buy", EDIT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.8% upside for EDIT (target: $5) vs 14.9% for CRSP (target: $63).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.00 | $63.00 | $40.83 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 17 | 38 | 27 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CLLS leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.
BCLI vs CLLS vs CRSP vs BEAM vs EDIT: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BCLI or CLLS or CRSP or BEAM or EDIT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cellectis S.
A. (CLLS) is the stronger pick with 54. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. (BCLI) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cellectis S. A. (CLLS) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BCLI or CLLS or CRSP or BEAM or EDIT?
Over the past 5 years, CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) delivered a total return of -46.
0%, compared to -98. 5% for Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. (BCLI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRSP returned +289. 1% versus BCLI's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BCLI or CLLS or CRSP or BEAM or EDIT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.
(BCLI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 05β versus Editas Medicine, Inc. 's 2. 45β — meaning EDIT is approximately 134% more volatile than BCLI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 70% for Cellectis S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BCLI or CLLS or CRSP or BEAM or EDIT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cellectis S.
A. (CLLS) is pulling ahead at 54. 0% versus -100. 0% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. grew EPS 148. 9% year-over-year, compared to -49. 1% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRSP leads at 100. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BCLI or CLLS or CRSP or BEAM or EDIT?
Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.
(BCLI) is the more profitable company, earning 1369% net margin versus -165. 7% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG — meaning it keeps 1369% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EDIT leads at 0. 0% versus -161. 9% for CRSP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCLI leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BCLI or CLLS or CRSP or BEAM or EDIT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is BCLI or CLLS or CRSP or BEAM or EDIT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.
(BCLI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 05)). Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT) carries a higher beta of 2. 45 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BCLI: -97. 8%, EDIT: -89. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BCLI and CLLS and CRSP and BEAM and EDIT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BCLI is a small-cap deep-value stock; CLLS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CRSP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BEAM is a small-cap high-growth stock; EDIT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.