Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BDTX vs DBVT vs IMVT vs KYMR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
BDTX vs DBVT vs IMVT vs KYMR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $163M | $1669.52T | $5.66B | $6.75B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $70M | $0.00 | $0.00 | $51M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $21M | $-168M | $-464M | $-315M |
| Gross Margin | 99.9% | — | — | 33.2% |
| Operating Margin | 16.9% | — | — | -7.0% |
| Forward P/E | 7.4x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $15M | $22M | $98K | $82M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $194M | $714M | $357M |
BDTX vs DBVT vs IMVT vs KYMR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Black Diamond Thera… (BDTX) | 100 | 9.8 | -90.2% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 97.2 | -2.8% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 84.4 | -15.6% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 254.1 | +154.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BDTX vs DBVT vs IMVT vs KYMR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BDTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 130.0% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
- 30.7% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
- 13.8% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%
DBVT plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 179.8% 10Y total return vs KYMR's 148.7%
KYMR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- beta 1.15
- Rev growth -16.7%, EPS growth -23.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 10.47x
- Beta 1.15, current ratio 10.47x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 130.0% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.7% margin vs KYMR's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.15 vs BDTX's 2.66, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +146.3% vs BDTX's +71.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.8% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
BDTX vs DBVT vs IMVT vs KYMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BDTX vs DBVT vs IMVT vs KYMR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BDTX leads in 2 of 6 categories
KYMR leads 1 • DBVT leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BDTX leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BDTX and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $70M and $0 in trailing revenue. BDTX is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KYMR's -6.1%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $70M | $0 | $0 | $51M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | -$112M | -$487M | -$352M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21M | -$168M | -$464M | -$315M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $21M | -$151M | -$423M | -$244M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.9% | — | — | +33.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | — | — | -7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.7% | — | — | -6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | — | — | -4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +55.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +46.4% | +91.5% | +19.7% | +13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — DBVT and KYMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $163M | $1669.52T | $5.7B | $6.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $158M | $1669.52T | $4.9B | $6.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.36x | -0.74x | -10.20x | -22.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.26x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | 172.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.47x | 0.64x | 5.96x | 4.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.52x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BDTX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BDTX delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BDTX's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BDTX scores 6/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.8% | -130.2% | -47.1% | -25.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.8% | -89.0% | -44.1% | -22.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.7% | — | — | -24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.9% | -145.7% | -66.1% | -27.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.13x | 0.00x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | -$172M | -$714M | -$275M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $194M | $714M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $22M | $98,000 | $82M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -189.82x | — | -2119.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KYMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KYMR five years ago would be worth $20,056 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,160 for BDTX. Over the past 12 months, KYMR leads with a +146.3% total return vs BDTX's +71.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KYMR at 41.8% vs DBVT's 5.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.3% | +2.3% | +7.4% | +13.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +71.9% | +110.7% | +82.9% | +146.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.7% | +18.1% | +45.0% | +185.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.4% | -69.6% | +69.8% | +100.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.7% | -87.1% | +179.8% | +148.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.4% | +5.7% | +13.2% | +41.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IMVT and KYMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KYMR is the less volatile stock with a 1.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BDTX's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 92.5% from its 52-week high vs BDTX's 58.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.66x | 1.26x | 1.37x | 1.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.94 | $26.18 | $30.09 | $103.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.46 | $7.53 | $13.36 | $28.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +58.1% | +74.4% | +92.5% | +80.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.6 | 43.7 | 55.8 | 48.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 721K | 249K | 1.4M | 623K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BDTX as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 178.7% upside for BDTX (target: $8) vs 41.5% for KYMR (target: $117).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $46.33 | $45.50 | $117.06 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 15 | 23 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BDTX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KYMR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
BDTX vs DBVT vs IMVT vs KYMR: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BDTX or DBVT or IMVT or KYMR a better buy right now?
Black Diamond Therapeutics, Inc.
(BDTX) offers the better valuation at 7. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Black Diamond Therapeutics, Inc. (BDTX) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BDTX or DBVT or IMVT or KYMR?
Over the past 5 years, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) delivered a total return of +100. 6%, compared to -88. 4% for Black Diamond Therapeutics, Inc. (BDTX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +179. 8% versus BDTX's -92. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BDTX or DBVT or IMVT or KYMR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 15β versus Black Diamond Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning BDTX is approximately 131% more volatile than KYMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 13% for Black Diamond Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BDTX or DBVT or IMVT or KYMR?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Black Diamond Therapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS 130. 7% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BDTX or DBVT or IMVT or KYMR?
Black Diamond Therapeutics, Inc.
(BDTX) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 7% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BDTX leads at 16. 9% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BDTX or DBVT or IMVT or KYMR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is BDTX or DBVT or IMVT or KYMR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15), +148. 7% 10Y return). Black Diamond Therapeutics, Inc. (BDTX) carries a higher beta of 2. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KYMR: +148. 7%, BDTX: -92. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BDTX and DBVT and IMVT and KYMR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BDTX is a small-cap deep-value stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.