Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BE vs ARRY vs PLUG vs ENPH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Solar
BE vs ARRY vs PLUG vs ENPH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Solar | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Solar |
| Market Cap | $68.63B | $1.24B | $4.61B | $4.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.45B | $1.21B | $710M | $1.40B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $-67M | $-1.63B | $135M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 22.4% | 99.8% | 44.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.2% | 4.5% | 38.1% | 6.8% |
| Forward P/E | 136.4x | 11.6x | — | 17.8x |
| Total Debt | $2.99B | $766M | $997M | $1.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.45B | $244M | $1M | $474M |
BE vs ARRY vs PLUG vs ENPH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bloom Energy Corpor… (BE) | 100 | 2258.5 | +2158.5% |
| Array Technologies,… (ARRY) | 100 | 22.0 | -78.0% |
| Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) | 100 | 23.6 | -76.4% |
| Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) | 100 | 36.5 | -63.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BE vs ARRY vs PLUG vs ENPH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 10.4% 10Y total return vs ENPH's 17.6%
- +16.5% vs ENPH's -18.4%
ARRY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.32
- Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth 62.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.8%
- 40.2% revenue growth vs ENPH's 10.7%
- Lower P/E (11.6x vs 17.8x)
PLUG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ENPH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.70, current ratio 2.07x
- Beta 1.70, current ratio 2.07x
- 9.6% margin vs PLUG's -229.8%
- Beta 1.70 vs BE's 3.61, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.2% revenue growth vs ENPH's 10.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.6x vs 17.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.6% margin vs PLUG's -229.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.70 vs BE's 3.61, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.5% vs ENPH's -18.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC 6.8% vs 10.9% |
BE vs ARRY vs PLUG vs ENPH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BE vs ARRY vs PLUG vs ENPH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ARRY leads in 2 of 6 categories
ENPH leads 1 • BE leads 1 • PLUG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BE and PLUG and ENPH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 3.4x PLUG's $710M. ENPH is the more profitable business, keeping 9.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLUG's -2.3%. On growth, BE holds the edge at +130.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.4B | $1.2B | $710M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $240M | $95M | -$1.5B | $171M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | -$67M | -$1.6B | $135M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $233M | $58M | -$2M | $145M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | +22.4% | +99.8% | +44.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +4.5% | +38.1% | +6.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.2% | -5.6% | -2.3% | +9.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +4.8% | -0.3% | +10.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +130.4% | -26.1% | +17.6% | -20.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | -7.0% | +95.9% | -127.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ARRY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ARRY's 13.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BE's 560.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $68.6B | $1.2B | $4.6B | $4.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $69.2B | $1.8B | $5.6B | $5.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -771.54x | -11.13x | — | 27.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 136.38x | 11.64x | — | 17.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 560.66x | 13.41x | — | 22.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 33.91x | 0.97x | 6.49x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 86.55x | 4.76x | — | 4.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1200.02x | 15.58x | — | 49.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ENPH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENPH delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-124 for PLUG. ENPH carries lower financial leverage with a 1.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ENPH scores 6/9 vs BE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.8% | -20.6% | -124.4% | +13.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.2% | -4.4% | -64.3% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.1% | +9.0% | +10.9% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.5% | +8.2% | +18.6% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.77x | 2.94x | 19.75x | 1.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $538M | $522M | $996M | $769M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.5B | $244M | $1M | $474M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.0B | $766M | $997M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.05x | -2.42x | -36.18x | 47.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BE five years ago would be worth $128,359 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,467 for PLUG. Over the past 12 months, BE leads with a +1647.1% total return vs ENPH's -18.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BE at 156.3% vs ENPH's -39.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +189.3% | -16.1% | +48.4% | +6.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1647.1% | +57.7% | +320.2% | -18.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1584.2% | -56.5% | -64.4% | -78.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1183.6% | -68.0% | -85.3% | -70.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1041.9% | -77.7% | +72.4% | +1764.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +156.3% | -24.2% | -29.1% | -39.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BE and ENPH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ENPH is the less volatile stock with a 1.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BE's 3.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BE currently trades 94.2% from its 52-week high vs ENPH's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.61x | 2.32x | 2.57x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $302.99 | $12.23 | $4.58 | $54.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.05 | $4.92 | $0.69 | $25.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.2% | +66.4% | +72.3% | +65.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 77.9 | 57.4 | 63.5 | 52.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10.1M | 6.0M | 76.7M | 5.9M |
Analyst Outlook
ARRY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BE as "Buy", ARRY as "Buy", PLUG as "Buy", ENPH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.5% upside for ENPH (target: $43) vs -34.3% for BE (target: $188).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $187.56 | $9.17 | $3.91 | $43.48 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | 28 | 38 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.0% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.00 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.8% |
ARRY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). ENPH leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
BE vs ARRY vs PLUG vs ENPH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BE or ARRY or PLUG or ENPH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 7% for Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH). Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) offers the better valuation at 27. 8x trailing P/E (17. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BE or ARRY or PLUG or ENPH?
On forward P/E, Array Technologies, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 11. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BE or ARRY or PLUG or ENPH?
Over the past 5 years, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) delivered a total return of +1184%, compared to -85.
3% for Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENPH returned +1765% versus ARRY's -77. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BE or ARRY or PLUG or ENPH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 70β versus Bloom Energy Corporation's 3. 61β — meaning BE is approximately 113% more volatile than ENPH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 114% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BE or ARRY or PLUG or ENPH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus 10. 7% for Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Plug Power Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -184. 6% for Bloom Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BE leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BE or ARRY or PLUG or ENPH?
Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 7% net margin versus -229. 8% for Plug Power Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus 3. 6% for BE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BE or ARRY or PLUG or ENPH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) trades at 11. 6x forward P/E versus 136. 4x for Bloom Energy Corporation — 124. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ENPH: 21. 5% to $43. 48.
08Which pays a better dividend — BE or ARRY or PLUG or ENPH?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BE or ARRY or PLUG or ENPH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1765% 10Y return). Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) carries a higher beta of 2. 32 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ENPH: +1765%, ARRY: -77. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BE and ARRY and PLUG and ENPH?
These companies operate in different sectors (BE (Industrials) and ARRY (Energy) and PLUG (Industrials) and ENPH (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ARRY is a small-cap high-growth stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ENPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.