Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BEDU vs WMT vs TGT vs EDU vs TAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Discount Stores
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
BEDU vs WMT vs TGT vs EDU vs TAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Specialty Retail | Discount Stores | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $17M | $1.04T | $57.36B | $8.97B | $771M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.12B | $703.06B | $106.25B | $4.99B | $2.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.02B | $22.91B | $4.04B | $367M | $171M |
| Gross Margin | 24.3% | 24.9% | 27.3% | 55.1% | 54.4% |
| Operating Margin | -87.6% | 4.1% | 5.3% | 9.0% | 2.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 44.7x | 15.7x | 16.2x | 18.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.51B | $67.09B | $5.59B | $804M | $333M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $493M | $10.73B | $5.49B | $1.61B | $1.77B |
BEDU vs WMT vs TGT vs EDU vs TAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Dec 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bright Scholar Educ… (BEDU) | 100 | 7.7 | -92.3% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 267.3 | +167.3% |
| Target Corporation (TGT) | 100 | 74.1 | -25.9% |
| New Oriental Educat… (EDU) | 100 | 42.6 | -57.4% |
| TAL Education Group (TAL) | 100 | 19.5 | -80.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BEDU vs WMT vs TGT vs EDU vs TAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BEDU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +39.8% vs EDU's +19.4%
WMT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs TGT's 99.5%
- Beta 0.12 vs BEDU's 1.24, lower leverage
- 7.9% ROA vs BEDU's -326.4%, ROIC 14.7% vs -27.8%
TGT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 3.6%
- Lower P/E (15.7x vs 18.1x)
- 3.6% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
EDU is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 13.6%, EPS growth 27.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 20.3%, current ratio 1.58x
- Beta 0.82, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.58x
- 7.4% margin vs BEDU's -90.9%
TAL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 51.2% revenue growth vs BEDU's -17.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.2% revenue growth vs BEDU's -17.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.7x vs 18.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.4% margin vs BEDU's -90.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs BEDU's 1.24, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.8% vs EDU's +19.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs BEDU's -326.4%, ROIC 14.7% vs -27.8% |
BEDU vs WMT vs TGT vs EDU vs TAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BEDU vs WMT vs TGT vs EDU vs TAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EDU leads in 1 of 6 categories
BEDU leads 1 • TAL leads 1 • WMT leads 1 • TGT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EDU leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 629.0x BEDU's $1.1B. EDU is the more profitable business, keeping 7.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BEDU's -90.9%. On growth, TAL holds the edge at +38.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $703.1B | $106.2B | $5.0B | $2.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$924M | $42.8B | $8.7B | $563M | $72M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.0B | $22.9B | $4.0B | $367M | $171M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $193M | $15.3B | $2.9B | $737M | $441M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.3% | +24.9% | +27.3% | +55.1% | +54.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -87.6% | +4.1% | +5.3% | +9.0% | +2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -90.9% | +3.3% | +3.8% | +7.4% | +6.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | +2.2% | +2.8% | +14.8% | +16.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -91.6% | +5.8% | +3.2% | +6.1% | +38.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.0% | +35.1% | +23.7% | 0.0% | -21.4% |
Valuation Metrics
BEDU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.0x trailing earnings, TAL trades at a 81% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TGT's 7.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WMT's 24.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17M | $1.04T | $57.4B | $9.0B | $771M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.0B | $1.09T | $57.5B | $8.2B | -$667M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.02x | 47.69x | 15.49x | 24.50x | 9.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 44.71x | 15.74x | 16.25x | 18.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.33x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 24.85x | 7.26x | 15.25x | -16.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 1.46x | 0.55x | 1.83x | 0.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 10.45x | 3.55x | 2.31x | 0.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.22x | 24.97x | 20.23x | 14.07x | 2.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TAL leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TGT delivers a 26.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $-14 for BEDU. TAL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BEDU's 2.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EDU scores 7/9 vs TAL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.0% | +22.3% | +26.1% | +9.1% | +4.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.3% | +7.9% | +6.9% | +4.8% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.8% | +14.7% | +16.7% | +9.9% | -0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -31.7% | +17.5% | +13.6% | +9.5% | -0.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.49x | 0.67x | 0.35x | 0.20x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.0B | $56.4B | $104M | -$809M | -$1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $493M | $10.7B | $5.5B | $1.6B | $1.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $67.1B | $5.6B | $804M | $333M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 547.21x | 11.85x | 12.40x | 1570.90x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,219 for BEDU. Over the past 12 months, BEDU leads with a +39.8% total return vs EDU's +19.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs TGT's -3.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +15.7% | +26.4% | -2.5% | -0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.8% | +32.7% | +36.6% | +19.4% | +23.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.3% | +160.5% | -11.0% | +37.2% | +103.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.8% | +186.9% | -31.6% | -61.5% | -79.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.3% | +499.5% | +99.5% | +47.3% | +27.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.5% | +37.6% | -3.8% | +11.1% | +26.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BEDU and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BEDU's 1.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BEDU currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs TAL's 85.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 0.12x | 0.95x | 0.82x | 0.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.28 | $134.69 | $133.07 | $64.97 | $13.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.50 | $91.89 | $83.44 | $41.62 | $9.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.7% | +96.7% | +94.6% | +86.7% | +85.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.7 | 55.9 | 61.4 | 54.8 | 52.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 40K | 17.2M | 4.5M | 689K | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WMT and TGT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WMT as "Buy", TGT as "Hold", EDU as "Buy", TAL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 57.9% upside for TAL (target: $18) vs -8.4% for TGT (target: $115). For income investors, TGT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.58% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $137.04 | $115.31 | $68.00 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 64 | 59 | 24 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | +3.6% | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 37 | 22 | 5 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 | $4.51 | $0.61 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.7% | +5.0% | +1.7% |
EDU leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). BEDU leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BEDU vs WMT vs TGT vs EDU vs TAL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BEDU or WMT or TGT or EDU or TAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TAL Education Group (TAL) is the stronger pick with 51.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 4% for Bright Scholar Education Holdings Limited (BEDU). TAL Education Group (TAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E (18. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BEDU or WMT or TGT or EDU or TAL?
On trailing P/E, TAL Education Group (TAL) is the cheapest at 9.
0x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, Target Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BEDU or WMT or TGT or EDU or TAL?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -87. 8% for Bright Scholar Education Holdings Limited (BEDU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus BEDU's -93. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BEDU or WMT or TGT or EDU or TAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Bright Scholar Education Holdings Limited's 1. 24β — meaning BEDU is approximately 960% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TAL Education Group (TAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 2% for Bright Scholar Education Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BEDU or WMT or TGT or EDU or TAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TAL Education Group (TAL) is pulling ahead at 51.
2% versus -17. 4% for Bright Scholar Education Holdings Limited (BEDU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TAL Education Group grew EPS 24. 7% year-over-year, compared to -152. 1% for Bright Scholar Education Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, EDU leads at 16. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BEDU or WMT or TGT or EDU or TAL?
New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
(EDU) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 6% net margin versus -56. 8% for Bright Scholar Education Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EDU leads at 8. 7% versus -46. 7% for BEDU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EDU leads at 55. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BEDU or WMT or TGT or EDU or TAL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Target Corporation (TGT) trades at 15.
7x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 29. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TAL: 57. 9% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BEDU or WMT or TGT or EDU or TAL?
In this comparison, TGT (3.
6% yield), EDU (1. 1% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. BEDU, TAL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BEDU or WMT or TGT or EDU or TAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, BEDU: -93. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BEDU and WMT and TGT and EDU and TAL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BEDU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; TGT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; EDU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TAL is a small-cap high-growth stock. WMT, TGT, EDU pay a dividend while BEDU, TAL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.