Solar
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BEEM vs AMRC vs CBAT vs NRGV vs EVGO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Renewable Utilities
Specialty Retail
BEEM vs AMRC vs CBAT vs NRGV vs EVGO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Solar | Engineering & Construction | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Renewable Utilities | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $35M | $1.57B | $70M | $716M | $596M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $28M | $1.98B | $162M | $217M | $418M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-29M | $31M | $-7M | $-115M | $-47M |
| Gross Margin | 15.0% | 15.6% | 10.8% | 22.1% | 20.2% |
| Operating Margin | -108.4% | 6.3% | -10.5% | -35.8% | -26.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 25.0x | 6.0x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $1.95B | $30M | $95M | $107M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $72M | $7M | $58M | $151M |
BEEM vs AMRC vs CBAT vs NRGV vs EVGO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beam Global (BEEM) | 100 | 4.4 | -95.6% |
| Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) | 100 | 61.0 | -39.0% |
| CBAK Energy Technol… (CBAT) | 100 | 15.4 | -84.6% |
| Energy Vault Holdin… (NRGV) | 100 | 42.7 | -57.3% |
| EVgo, Inc. (EVGO) | 100 | 13.9 | -86.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BEEM vs AMRC vs CBAT vs NRGV vs EVGO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BEEM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
AMRC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs NRGV's -57.1%
- 1.6% margin vs BEEM's -105.9%
- 0.7% ROA vs BEEM's -65.7%, ROIC 3.3% vs -22.1%
CBAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.05
- Lower volatility, beta 1.05, Low D/E 25.1%, current ratio 0.82x
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 1.05 vs NRGV's 3.08, lower leverage
NRGV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 340.9%, EPS growth 28.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.8%
- 340.9% revenue growth vs BEEM's -26.8%
- +447.1% vs EVGO's -48.2%
EVGO is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 2.04, current ratio 2.19x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 340.9% revenue growth vs BEEM's -26.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.6% margin vs BEEM's -105.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.05 vs NRGV's 3.08, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +447.1% vs EVGO's -48.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.7% ROA vs BEEM's -65.7%, ROIC 3.3% vs -22.1% |
BEEM vs AMRC vs CBAT vs NRGV vs EVGO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BEEM vs AMRC vs CBAT vs NRGV vs EVGO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NRGV leads in 2 of 6 categories
CBAT leads 1 • BEEM leads 0 • AMRC leads 0 • EVGO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NRGV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMRC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.0B annually — 71.6x BEEM's $28M. AMRC is the more profitable business, keeping 1.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BEEM's -105.9%. On growth, NRGV holds the edge at +156.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $28M | $2.0B | $162M | $217M | $418M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$25M | $204M | -$8M | -$72M | -$39M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$29M | $31M | -$7M | -$115M | -$47M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | -$251M | -$8M | -$98M | -$165M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +15.6% | +10.8% | +22.1% | +20.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -108.4% | +6.3% | -10.5% | -35.8% | -26.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -105.9% | +1.6% | -4.0% | -53.0% | -11.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -24.0% | -12.7% | -5.1% | -45.2% | -39.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -49.6% | +13.8% | +36.5% | +156.4% | +45.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.2% | -2.5% | — | -42.9% | -66.7% |
Valuation Metrics
CBAT leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.0x trailing earnings, CBAT trades at a 83% valuation discount to AMRC's 35.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CBAT's 5.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMRC's 15.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35M | $1.6B | $70M | $716M | $596M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33M | $3.4B | $94M | $752M | $552M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.45x | 35.76x | 6.04x | -6.37x | -6.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.04x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.00x | 5.22x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.71x | 0.81x | 0.40x | 3.52x | 1.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.67x | 1.41x | 0.59x | 7.50x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 3.13x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — AMRC and CBAT each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMRC delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-147 for NRGV. BEEM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMRC's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CBAT scores 7/9 vs BEEM's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -110.5% | +2.9% | -5.5% | -146.8% | -12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -65.7% | +0.7% | -2.0% | -40.3% | -5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -22.1% | +3.3% | +4.6% | -49.5% | -21.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -21.4% | +3.7% | +7.0% | -53.7% | -14.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 1.73x | 0.25x | 1.07x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $1.9B | $23M | $36M | -$44M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $72M | $7M | $58M | $151M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $1.9B | $30M | $95M | $107M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -715.85x | 1.20x | -24.86x | -10.33x | -11.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NRGV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMRC five years ago would be worth $5,600 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $607 for BEEM. Over the past 12 months, NRGV leads with a +447.1% total return vs EVGO's -48.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NRGV at 34.0% vs BEEM's -42.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.7% | -3.2% | -8.7% | -15.3% | -38.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.2% | +134.3% | -6.9% | +447.1% | -48.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.8% | -29.9% | +2.0% | +140.7% | -70.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.9% | -44.0% | -81.0% | -57.7% | -83.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.5% | +542.4% | -69.9% | -57.1% | -80.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -42.3% | -11.2% | +0.7% | +34.0% | -33.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMRC and CBAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CBAT is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NRGV's 3.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMRC currently trades 66.1% from its 52-week high vs EVGO's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.69x | 2.03x | 1.05x | 3.08x | 2.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.04 | $44.93 | $1.25 | $6.35 | $5.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.33 | $12.37 | $0.77 | $0.65 | $1.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +46.8% | +66.1% | +62.8% | +65.2% | +36.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.7 | 68.0 | 39.6 | 53.3 | 40.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 483K | 507K | 111K | 3.7M | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMRC as "Buy", NRGV as "Buy", EVGO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 176.3% upside for EVGO (target: $5) vs -33.6% for NRGV (target: $3).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $43.17 | — | $2.75 | $5.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 | — | 7 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NRGV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CBAT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BEEM vs AMRC vs CBAT vs NRGV vs EVGO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BEEM or AMRC or CBAT or NRGV or EVGO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is the stronger pick with 340. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -26. 8% for Beam Global (BEEM). CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BEEM or AMRC or CBAT or NRGV or EVGO?
On trailing P/E, CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
(CBAT) is the cheapest at 6. 0x versus Ameresco, Inc. at 35. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BEEM or AMRC or CBAT or NRGV or EVGO?
Over the past 5 years, Ameresco, Inc.
(AMRC) delivered a total return of -44. 0%, compared to -93. 9% for Beam Global (BEEM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMRC returned +542. 4% versus EVGO's -80. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BEEM or AMRC or CBAT or NRGV or EVGO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
(CBAT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 05β versus Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 08β — meaning NRGV is approximately 194% more volatile than CBAT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Beam Global (BEEM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 173% for Ameresco, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BEEM or AMRC or CBAT or NRGV or EVGO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is pulling ahead at 340. 9% versus -26. 8% for Beam Global (BEEM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. grew EPS 574. 5% year-over-year, compared to -22. 4% for Ameresco, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVGO leads at 91. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BEEM or AMRC or CBAT or NRGV or EVGO?
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
(CBAT) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 7% net margin versus -50. 9% for Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMRC leads at 6. 5% versus -36. 5% for NRGV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBAT leads at 23. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BEEM or AMRC or CBAT or NRGV or EVGO more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EVGO: 176.
3% to $5. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — BEEM or AMRC or CBAT or NRGV or EVGO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BEEM or AMRC or CBAT or NRGV or EVGO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
(CBAT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 05)). EVgo, Inc. (EVGO) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBAT: -69. 9%, EVGO: -80. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BEEM and AMRC and CBAT and NRGV and EVGO?
These companies operate in different sectors (BEEM (Energy) and AMRC (Industrials) and CBAT (Industrials) and NRGV (Utilities) and EVGO (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BEEM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CBAT is a small-cap deep-value stock; NRGV is a small-cap high-growth stock; EVGO is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.