Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BEKE vs RMR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Services
BEKE vs RMR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $62.71B | $625M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $103.52B | $640M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3.48B | $23M |
| Gross Margin | 21.9% | 93.1% |
| Operating Margin | 3.2% | 9.4% |
| Forward P/E | 3.3x | 26.7x |
| Total Debt | $22.65B | $204M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11.44B | $62M |
BEKE vs RMR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE) | 100 | 36.6 | -63.4% |
| The RMR Group Inc. (RMR) | 100 | 69.5 | -30.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BEKE vs RMR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BEKE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 20.2%, EPS growth -29.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- 20.2% FFO/revenue growth vs RMR's -22.0%
- Lower P/E (3.3x vs 26.7x)
RMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 9.3%
- 59.7% 10Y total return vs BEKE's -46.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 50.8%, current ratio 1.64x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.2% FFO/revenue growth vs RMR's -22.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.3x vs 26.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.6% margin vs BEKE's 3.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs BEKE's 0.83 | |
| Dividends | 9.3% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs BEKE's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.5% vs BEKE's -7.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.4% ROA vs BEKE's 2.7%, ROIC 6.7% vs 3.7% |
BEKE vs RMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BEKE vs RMR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BEKE is the larger business by revenue, generating $103.5B annually — 161.7x RMR's $640M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.6% (RMR) to 3.4% (BEKE). On growth, BEKE holds the edge at +2.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $103.5B | $640M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.3B | $76M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3.5B | $23M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.4B | $92M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +93.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +3.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +14.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | -12.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -32.7% | -76.2% |
Valuation Metrics
RMR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.0x trailing earnings, RMR trades at a 49% valuation discount to BEKE's 37.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RMR's 14.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BEKE's 91.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $62.7B | $625M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $64.4B | $767M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.13x | 19.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3.33x | 26.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 91.84x | 14.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.57x | 0.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.11x | 0.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 50.84x | 8.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RMR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RMR delivers a 5.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $5 for BEKE. BEKE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RMR's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BEKE scores 5/9 vs RMR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.0% | +5.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | +3.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.7% | +7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.32x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $11.2B | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11.4B | $62M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22.7B | $204M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 131.87x | 14.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RMR five years ago would be worth $8,763 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,960 for BEKE. Over the past 12 months, RMR leads with a +47.5% total return vs BEKE's -7.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BEKE at 7.7% vs RMR's 3.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.4% | +35.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.4% | +47.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.8% | +11.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.4% | -12.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.8% | +59.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.7% | +3.8% |
Risk & Volatility
RMR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RMR is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BEKE's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RMR currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs BEKE's 89.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.98 | $19.91 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.40 | $13.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.6% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.5 | 77.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.1M | 155K |
Analyst Outlook
RMR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BEKE as "Buy" and RMR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 63.1% upside for RMR (target: $32) vs 17.8% for BEKE (target: $22). For income investors, RMR offers the higher dividend yield at 9.29% vs BEKE's 1.87%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.13 | $32.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +9.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.40 | $1.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | +0.1% |
RMR leads in 6 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
BEKE vs RMR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BEKE or RMR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, KE Holdings Inc.
(BEKE) is the stronger pick with 20. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 0% for The RMR Group Inc. (RMR). The RMR Group Inc. (RMR) offers the better valuation at 19. 0x trailing P/E (26. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BEKE or RMR?
On trailing P/E, The RMR Group Inc.
(RMR) is the cheapest at 19. 0x versus KE Holdings Inc. at 37. 1x. On forward P/E, KE Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 3. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BEKE or RMR?
Over the past 5 years, The RMR Group Inc.
(RMR) delivered a total return of -12. 4%, compared to -60. 4% for KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RMR returned +59. 7% versus BEKE's -46. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BEKE or RMR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The RMR Group Inc.
(RMR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus KE Holdings Inc. 's 0. 83β — meaning BEKE is approximately 28% more volatile than RMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 51% for The RMR Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BEKE or RMR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), KE Holdings Inc.
(BEKE) is pulling ahead at 20. 2% versus -22. 0% for The RMR Group Inc. (RMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The RMR Group Inc. grew EPS -25. 4% year-over-year, compared to -29. 4% for KE Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BEKE leads at 5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BEKE or RMR?
KE Holdings Inc.
(BEKE) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 3% net margin versus 2. 5% for The RMR Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RMR leads at 6. 0% versus 4. 0% for BEKE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RMR leads at 76. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BEKE or RMR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, KE Holdings Inc.
(BEKE) trades at 3. 3x forward P/E versus 26. 7x for The RMR Group Inc. — 23. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RMR: 63. 1% to $32. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BEKE or RMR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The RMR Group Inc. (RMR) offers the highest yield at 9. 3%, versus 1. 9% for KE Holdings Inc. (BEKE).
09Is BEKE or RMR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The RMR Group Inc.
(RMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 9. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RMR: +59. 7%, BEKE: -46. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BEKE and RMR?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BEKE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RMR is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.