Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BELFB vs VICR vs POWI vs MCHP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
BELFB vs VICR vs POWI vs MCHP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $3.67B | $11.79B | $4.00B | $54.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $702M | $453M | $446M | $4.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $55M | $119M | $17M | $-97M |
| Gross Margin | 39.2% | 57.3% | 53.9% | 51.6% |
| Operating Margin | 15.7% | 18.1% | 4.6% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 37.3x | 94.3x | 55.5x | 64.8x |
| Total Debt | $237M | $13M | $0.00 | $5.67B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $58M | $403M | $59M | $772M |
BELFB vs VICR vs POWI vs MCHP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFB) | 100 | 3099.9 | +2999.9% |
| Vicor Corporation (VICR) | 100 | 428.6 | +328.6% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 132.6 | +32.6% |
| Microchip Technolog… (MCHP) | 100 | 211.6 | +111.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BELFB vs VICR vs POWI vs MCHP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BELFB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 26.3%, EPS growth 42.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.88, Low D/E 45.7%, current ratio 3.02x
- PEG 0.97 vs VICR's 2.10
- 26.3% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3%
VICR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 27.0% 10Y total return vs BELFB's 16.3%
- 26.2% margin vs MCHP's -2.2%
- +5.4% vs POWI's +44.4%
- 16.6% ROA vs MCHP's -0.7%, ROIC 8.9% vs 1.8%
POWI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MCHP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.70, yield 1.8%
- Beta 1.70, yield 1.8%, current ratio 2.59x
- Beta 1.70 vs VICR's 2.79
- 1.8% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs POWI's 1.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.3% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (37.3x vs 64.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.2% margin vs MCHP's -2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.70 vs VICR's 2.79 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs POWI's 1.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.4% vs POWI's +44.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.6% ROA vs MCHP's -0.7%, ROIC 8.9% vs 1.8% |
BELFB vs VICR vs POWI vs MCHP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BELFB vs VICR vs POWI vs MCHP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VICR leads in 1 of 6 categories
BELFB leads 1 • MCHP leads 1 • POWI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VICR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCHP is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 9.8x POWI's $446M. VICR is the more profitable business, keeping 26.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MCHP's -2.2%. On growth, BELFB holds the edge at +17.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $702M | $453M | $446M | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $137M | $103M | $41M | $881M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $55M | $119M | $17M | -$97M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $74M | $119M | $85M | $820M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.2% | +57.3% | +53.9% | +51.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +18.1% | +4.6% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | +26.2% | +3.7% | -2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +26.3% | +18.9% | +18.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.2% | +11.5% | +2.6% | +15.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -37.0% | +3.4% | -60.0% | +164.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BELFB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 62.6x trailing earnings, BELFB trades at a 66% valuation discount to POWI's 184.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BELFB offers better value at 1.63x vs VICR's 2.23x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.7B | $11.8B | $4.0B | $55.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.9B | $11.4B | $3.9B | $59.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 62.60x | 100.13x | 184.18x | -9999.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 37.33x | 94.31x | 55.51x | 64.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.63x | 2.23x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.67x | 197.81x | 79.69x | 57.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.44x | 28.91x | 9.02x | 12.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.02x | 16.50x | 6.01x | 7.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 54.05x | 98.86x | 45.93x | 71.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BELFB and VICR each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VICR delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-1 for MCHP. VICR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MCHP's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BELFB scores 9/9 vs MCHP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.6% | +18.7% | +2.4% | -1.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.8% | +16.6% | +2.1% | -0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.6% | +8.9% | +2.4% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.2% | +5.7% | +2.9% | +2.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.02x | — | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $179M | -$390M | -$59M | $4.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $58M | $403M | $59M | $772M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $237M | $13M | $0 | $5.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.38x | — | — | 0.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BELFB and VICR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BELFB five years ago would be worth $167,159 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,165 for POWI. Over the past 12 months, VICR leads with a +535.7% total return vs POWI's +44.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BELFB at 89.2% vs POWI's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +68.2% | +123.6% | +93.2% | +56.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +314.0% | +535.7% | +44.4% | +115.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +577.4% | +507.9% | -6.3% | +43.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1571.6% | +201.3% | -8.3% | +45.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1633.2% | +2704.1% | +232.7% | +373.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +89.2% | +82.5% | -2.2% | +12.9% |
Risk & Volatility
MCHP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MCHP is the less volatile stock with a 1.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VICR's 2.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCHP currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs VICR's 88.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.88x | 2.79x | 2.08x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $307.00 | $293.95 | $78.94 | $103.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $68.05 | $40.27 | $30.86 | $46.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.6% | +88.9% | +91.0% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.2 | 68.2 | 76.1 | 82.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 179K | 864K | 967K | 9.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — POWI and MCHP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BELFB as "Buy", VICR as "Buy", POWI as "Buy", MCHP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.0% upside for POWI (target: $79) vs -14.4% for MCHP (target: $87). For income investors, MCHP offers the higher dividend yield at 1.79% vs POWI's 1.17%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $281.00 | $245.00 | $79.00 | $87.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 7 | 16 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | — | +1.2% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 | 18 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | — | $0.84 | $1.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +2.5% | +0.2% |
VICR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). BELFB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
BELFB vs VICR vs POWI vs MCHP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BELFB or VICR or POWI or MCHP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bel Fuse Inc.
(BELFB) is the stronger pick with 26. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFB) offers the better valuation at 62. 6x trailing P/E (37. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFB) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BELFB or VICR or POWI or MCHP?
On trailing P/E, Bel Fuse Inc.
(BELFB) is the cheapest at 62. 6x versus Power Integrations, Inc. at 184. 2x. On forward P/E, Bel Fuse Inc. is actually cheaper at 37. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bel Fuse Inc. wins at 0. 97x versus Vicor Corporation's 2. 10x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BELFB or VICR or POWI or MCHP?
Over the past 5 years, Bel Fuse Inc.
(BELFB) delivered a total return of +1572%, compared to -8. 3% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VICR returned +27. 0% versus POWI's +232. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BELFB or VICR or POWI or MCHP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
70β versus Vicor Corporation's 2. 79β — meaning VICR is approximately 65% more volatile than MCHP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vicor Corporation (VICR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 80% for Microchip Technology Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BELFB or VICR or POWI or MCHP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bel Fuse Inc.
(BELFB) is pulling ahead at 26. 3% versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vicor Corporation grew EPS 1764% year-over-year, compared to -100. 1% for Microchip Technology Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, BELFB leads at 1. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BELFB or VICR or POWI or MCHP?
Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the more profitable company, earning 29.
1% net margin versus -0. 0% for Microchip Technology Incorporated — meaning it keeps 29. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BELFB leads at 15. 9% versus 4. 8% for POWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MCHP leads at 56. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BELFB or VICR or POWI or MCHP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 97x versus Vicor Corporation's 2. 10x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFB) trades at 37. 3x forward P/E versus 94. 3x for Vicor Corporation — 57. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for POWI: 10. 0% to $79. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BELFB or VICR or POWI or MCHP?
In this comparison, MCHP (1.
8% yield), POWI (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. BELFB, VICR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BELFB or VICR or POWI or MCHP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bel Fuse Inc.
(BELFB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1633% 10Y return). Vicor Corporation (VICR) carries a higher beta of 2. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BELFB: +1633%, VICR: +27. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BELFB and VICR and POWI and MCHP?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BELFB is a small-cap high-growth stock; VICR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MCHP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. POWI, MCHP pay a dividend while BELFB, VICR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.