Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BEPC vs ENPH vs NEE vs SEDG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
Regulated Electric
Solar
BEPC vs ENPH vs NEE vs SEDG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Solar | Regulated Electric | Solar |
| Market Cap | $5.41B | $4.67B | $194.60B | $2.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.73B | $1.40B | $27.93B | $1.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2.34B | $135M | $8.18B | $-364M |
| Gross Margin | 59.9% | 44.2% | 47.8% | 18.2% |
| Operating Margin | 56.9% | 6.8% | 29.5% | -18.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.6x | 23.1x | 610.9x |
| Total Debt | $21.33B | $1.24B | $95.62B | $423M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $964M | $474M | $2.81B | $540M |
BEPC vs ENPH vs NEE vs SEDG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brookfield Renewabl… (BEPC) | 100 | 124.0 | +24.0% |
| Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) | 100 | 58.8 | -41.2% |
| NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) | 100 | 133.0 | +33.0% |
| SolarEdge Technolog… (SEDG) | 100 | 22.1 | -77.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BEPC vs ENPH vs NEE vs SEDG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BEPC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ENPH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and efficiency is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
- 4.2% ROA vs SEDG's -15.9%, ROIC 6.8% vs -29.5%
NEE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 30 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 2.4%
- 266.0% 10Y total return vs ENPH's 17.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.21, current ratio 0.60x
- PEG 1.33 vs ENPH's 2.79
SEDG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 31.4%, EPS growth 78.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -27.5%
- 31.4% revenue growth vs BEPC's -10.0%
- +161.4% vs ENPH's -18.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.4% revenue growth vs BEPC's -10.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.3% margin vs BEPC's -62.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs SEDG's 2.03 | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, 30-year raise streak, vs BEPC's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +161.4% vs ENPH's -18.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs SEDG's -15.9%, ROIC 6.8% vs -29.5% |
BEPC vs ENPH vs NEE vs SEDG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BEPC vs ENPH vs NEE vs SEDG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NEE leads in 3 of 6 categories
BEPC leads 1 • ENPH leads 1 • SEDG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BEPC and NEE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEE is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.9B annually — 21.9x SEDG's $1.3B. NEE is the more profitable business, keeping 29.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BEPC's -62.9%. On growth, SEDG holds the edge at +41.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.7B | $1.4B | $27.9B | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.4B | $171M | $15.5B | -$225M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2.3B | $135M | $8.2B | -$364M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$745M | $145M | -$3.8B | $78M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.9% | +44.2% | +47.8% | +18.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +56.9% | +6.8% | +29.5% | -18.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -62.9% | +9.6% | +29.3% | -28.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -20.0% | +10.4% | -13.6% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.0% | -20.6% | +7.3% | +41.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -192.7% | -127.3% | +160.0% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BEPC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.5x trailing earnings, ENPH trades at a 3% valuation discount to NEE's 28.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NEE offers better value at 1.64x vs ENPH's 4.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.4B | $4.7B | $194.6B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25.8B | $5.4B | $287.4B | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.85x | 27.50x | 28.36x | -5.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.61x | 23.07x | 610.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.36x | 1.64x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.66x | 22.19x | 18.73x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.45x | 3.17x | 7.08x | 1.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.53x | 4.40x | 2.93x | 5.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 48.75x | — | 29.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ENPH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENPH delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-80 for SEDG. SEDG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.99x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BEPC's 1.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SEDG scores 7/9 vs BEPC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -20.2% | +13.3% | +12.7% | -79.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.6% | +4.2% | +3.9% | -15.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.4% | +6.8% | +4.1% | -29.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.7% | +6.8% | +4.7% | -19.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.69x | 1.14x | 1.44x | 0.99x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $20.4B | $769M | $92.8B | -$116M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $964M | $474M | $2.8B | $540M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $21.3B | $1.2B | $95.6B | $423M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.41x | 47.60x | 1.99x | -2.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NEE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NEE five years ago would be worth $13,819 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,752 for SEDG. Over the past 12 months, SEDG leads with a +161.4% total return vs ENPH's -18.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NEE at 9.4% vs SEDG's -49.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.9% | +5.1% | +16.1% | +23.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.9% | -18.9% | +42.0% | +161.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.9% | -78.3% | +31.0% | -86.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.3% | -71.2% | +38.2% | -82.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +57.1% | +1737.8% | +266.0% | +70.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.6% | -39.9% | +9.4% | -49.0% |
Risk & Volatility
NEE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SEDG's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NEE currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs ENPH's 65.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.96x | 1.70x | 0.21x | 2.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.10 | $54.43 | $98.75 | $53.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.47 | $25.78 | $63.88 | $13.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.4% | +65.2% | +94.5% | +71.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.6 | 52.1 | 54.3 | 45.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 5.9M | 8.7M | 3.6M |
Analyst Outlook
NEE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BEPC as "Buy", ENPH as "Hold", NEE as "Buy", SEDG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 22.6% upside for ENPH (target: $43) vs -9.1% for SEDG (target: $35). NEE is the only dividend payer here at 2.40% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.00 | $43.48 | $98.13 | $35.09 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 55 | 36 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | — | +2.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 30 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.03 | — | $2.24 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NEE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). BEPC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BEPC vs ENPH vs NEE vs SEDG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BEPC or ENPH or NEE or SEDG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
(SEDG) is the stronger pick with 31. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 0% for Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC). Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) offers the better valuation at 27. 5x trailing P/E (17. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BEPC or ENPH or NEE or SEDG?
On trailing P/E, Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) is the cheapest at 27. 5x versus NextEra Energy, Inc. at 28. 4x. On forward P/E, Enphase Energy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NextEra Energy, Inc. wins at 1. 33x versus Enphase Energy, Inc. 's 2. 79x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BEPC or ENPH or NEE or SEDG?
Over the past 5 years, NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) delivered a total return of +38. 2%, compared to -82. 5% for SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. (SEDG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENPH returned +1738% versus BEPC's +57. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BEPC or ENPH or NEE or SEDG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 03β — meaning SEDG is approximately 881% more volatile than NEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. (SEDG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 99% versus 169% for Brookfield Renewable Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BEPC or ENPH or NEE or SEDG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
(SEDG) is pulling ahead at 31. 4% versus -10. 0% for Brookfield Renewable Corporation (BEPC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 78. 2% year-over-year, compared to -900. 6% for Brookfield Renewable Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NEE leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BEPC or ENPH or NEE or SEDG?
NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 9% net margin versus -62. 9% for Brookfield Renewable Corporation — meaning it keeps 24. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BEPC leads at 56. 9% versus -24. 1% for SEDG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NEE leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BEPC or ENPH or NEE or SEDG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 33x versus Enphase Energy, Inc. 's 2. 79x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) trades at 17. 6x forward P/E versus 610. 9x for SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. — 593. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ENPH: 22. 6% to $43. 48.
08Which pays a better dividend — BEPC or ENPH or NEE or SEDG?
In this comparison, NEE (2.
4% yield) pays a dividend. BEPC, ENPH, SEDG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BEPC or ENPH or NEE or SEDG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21), 2. 4% yield, +266. 0% 10Y return). SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. (SEDG) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEE: +266. 0%, SEDG: +70. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BEPC and ENPH and NEE and SEDG?
These companies operate in different sectors (BEPC (Utilities) and ENPH (Energy) and NEE (Utilities) and SEDG (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BEPC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ENPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NEE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SEDG is a small-cap high-growth stock. NEE pays a dividend while BEPC, ENPH, SEDG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.