Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BFC vs MNSB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BFC
Bank First Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.43B
5Y Perf.+132.6%
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$176M
5Y Perf.+77.2%

BFC vs MNSB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BFC logoBFC
MNSB logoMNSB
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$1.43B$176M
Revenue (TTM)$223M$136M
Net Income (TTM)$71M$16M
Gross Margin69.6%54.4%
Operating Margin35.6%14.0%
Forward P/E15.0x10.4x
Total Debt$147M$70M
Cash & Equiv.$261M$25M

BFC vs MNSBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BFC
MNSB
StockMay 20May 26Return
Bank First Corporat… (BFC)100232.6+132.6%
MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB)100177.2+77.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BFC vs MNSB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BFC leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BFC
Bank First Corporation
The Banking Pick

BFC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.78, yield 1.1%
  • Rev growth 19.7%, EPS growth -10.5%
  • 447.2% 10Y total return vs MNSB's 126.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 32.0%
  • Beta 0.66
  • NIM 3.1% vs BFC's 3.1%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBFC logoBFC19.7% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
ValueMNSB logoMNSBLower P/E (10.4x vs 15.0x)
Quality / MarginsBFC logoBFCEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs MNSB's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyMNSB logoMNSBBeta 0.66 vs BFC's 0.78
DividendsBFC logoBFC1.1% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BFC logoBFC+29.6% vs MNSB's +26.4%
Efficiency (ROA)BFC logoBFCEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs MNSB's 0.4%

BFC vs MNSB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BFCBank First Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

MNSBMainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Core Banking Segment
100.0%$134M

BFC vs MNSB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBFCLAGGINGMNSB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BFC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

BFC is the larger business by revenue, generating $223M annually — 1.6x MNSB's $136M. BFC is the more profitable business, keeping 29.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNSB's 11.5%.

MetricBFC logoBFCBank First Corpor…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$223M$136M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$95M$23M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$71M$16M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$52M$13M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+69.6%+54.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+35.6%+14.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+29.4%+11.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+26.3%+7.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+10.9%+120.9%
BFC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MNSB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 13.4x trailing earnings, MNSB trades at a 40% valuation discount to BFC's 22.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNSB's 11.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BFC's 15.0x.

MetricBFC logoBFCBank First Corpor…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
Market CapShares × price$1.4B$176M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.3B$221M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS22.31x13.36x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.02x10.45x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.04x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.98x11.58x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.39x1.30x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.28x0.82x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF24.32x16.57x
MNSB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BFC leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.

BFC delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. BFC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MNSB's 0.32x.

MetricBFC logoBFCBank First Corpor…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.2%+7.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.6%+0.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.8%+5.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+10.3%+0.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.23x0.32x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$114M$45M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$261M$25M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$147M$70M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.21x0.31x
BFC leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BFC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BFC five years ago would be worth $21,510 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,056 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, BFC leads with a +29.6% total return vs MNSB's +26.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BFC at 31.0% vs MNSB's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBFC logoBFCBank First Corpor…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+20.6%+19.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+29.6%+26.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+125.0%+21.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+115.1%+20.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+447.2%+126.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+31.0%+6.7%
BFC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BFC and MNSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MNSB is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BFC's 0.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricBFC logoBFCBank First Corpor…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.78x0.66x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$153.00$25.17
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$109.11$17.86
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+94.8%+93.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.050.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded92K58K
Evenly matched — BFC and MNSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates BFC as "Hold" and MNSB as "Hold". BFC is the only dividend payer here at 1.07% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricBFC logoBFCBank First Corpor…MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$157.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts31
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises22
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.55
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.2%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

BFC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MNSB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallBank First Corporation (BFC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BFC vs MNSB: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BFC or MNSB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bank First Corporation (BFC) is the stronger pick with 19.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bank First Corporation (BFC) a "Hold" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BFC or MNSB?

On trailing P/E, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

(MNSB) is the cheapest at 13. 4x versus Bank First Corporation at 22. 3x. On forward P/E, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BFC or MNSB?

Over the past 5 years, Bank First Corporation (BFC) delivered a total return of +115.

1%, compared to +20. 6% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BFC returned +447. 2% versus MNSB's +126. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BFC or MNSB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

(MNSB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Bank First Corporation's 0. 78β — meaning BFC is approximately 17% more volatile than MNSB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bank First Corporation (BFC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 32% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BFC or MNSB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bank First Corporation (BFC) is pulling ahead at 19.

7% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to -10. 5% for Bank First Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BFC or MNSB?

Bank First Corporation (BFC) is the more profitable company, earning 29.

4% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BFC leads at 35. 6% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BFC leads at 69. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BFC or MNSB more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

(MNSB) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 15. 0x for Bank First Corporation — 4. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BFC or MNSB?

In this comparison, BFC (1.

1% yield) pays a dividend. MNSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BFC or MNSB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Bank First Corporation (BFC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

78), 1. 1% yield, +447. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BFC: +447. 2%, MNSB: +126. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BFC and MNSB?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BFC is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock. BFC pays a dividend while MNSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

BFC

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MNSB

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BFC and MNSB on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BFC: 19.7% · MNSB: -1.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(BFC: 29.4% · MNSB: 11.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(BFC: 22.3x · MNSB: 13.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.