Luxury Goods
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BGI vs PVH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Manufacturers
BGI vs PVH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Luxury Goods | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $13M | $4.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $348M | $8.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $469M |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | 58.2% |
| Operating Margin | -0.6% | 7.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.1x |
| Total Debt | $145M | $3.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $748M |
BGI vs PVH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Birks Group Inc. (BGI) | 100 | 114.2 | +14.2% |
| PVH Corp. (PVH) | 100 | 194.9 | +94.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BGI vs PVH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BGI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.83
- Rev growth -4.0%, EPS growth -179.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.7%
- 35.8% 10Y total return vs PVH's -1.9%
PVH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- 5.3% margin vs BGI's -3.8%
- 0.2% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
- +24.6% vs BGI's -24.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -4.0% revenue growth vs PVH's -6.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.3% margin vs BGI's -3.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs PVH's 1.48 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.6% vs BGI's -24.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.0% ROA vs BGI's -6.8%, ROIC 7.0% vs -3.0% |
BGI vs PVH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BGI vs PVH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PVH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PVH is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.8B annually — 25.2x BGI's $348M. PVH is the more profitable business, keeping 5.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BGI's -3.8%. On growth, PVH holds the edge at +4.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $348M | $8.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $924M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | $469M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$20M | $516M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.9% | +58.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.6% | +7.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | +5.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | +5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.8% | +4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -104.6% | +65.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BGI leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PVH's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BGI's 73.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $119M | $6.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.40x | 8.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 73.82x | 6.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.10x | 0.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 6.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PVH leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PVH scores 7/9 vs BGI's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +9.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.8% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.0% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.8% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $144M | $2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $748M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $145M | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.54x | 2.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PVH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PVH five years ago would be worth $7,525 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,604 for BGI. Over the past 12 months, PVH leads with a +24.6% total return vs BGI's -24.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PVH at 2.5% vs BGI's -58.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.4% | +30.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -24.1% | +24.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.8% | +7.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.0% | -24.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.8% | -1.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -58.4% | +2.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BGI and PVH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BGI is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PVH's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PVH currently trades 88.5% from its 52-week high vs BGI's 43.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.57 | $100.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.56 | $59.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.7% | +88.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.8 | 60.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 26K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
PVH is the only dividend payer here at 0.17% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $100.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +12.9% |
PVH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BGI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BGI vs PVH: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BGI or PVH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Birks Group Inc.
(BGI) is the stronger pick with -4. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 1% for PVH Corp. (PVH). PVH Corp. (PVH) offers the better valuation at 8. 4x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PVH Corp. (PVH) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BGI or PVH?
Over the past 5 years, PVH Corp.
(PVH) delivered a total return of -24. 8%, compared to -54. 0% for Birks Group Inc. (BGI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BGI returned +35. 8% versus PVH's -1. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BGI or PVH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Birks Group Inc.
(BGI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus PVH Corp. 's 1. 48β — meaning PVH is approximately 77% more volatile than BGI relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — BGI or PVH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Birks Group Inc.
(BGI) is pulling ahead at -4. 0% versus -6. 1% for PVH Corp. (PVH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PVH Corp. grew EPS -1. 9% year-over-year, compared to -179. 2% for Birks Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BGI leads at -0. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BGI or PVH?
PVH Corp.
(PVH) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 9% net margin versus -7. 2% for Birks Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PVH leads at 8. 5% versus -3. 1% for BGI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PVH leads at 59. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BGI or PVH?
In this comparison, PVH (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. BGI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is BGI or PVH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Birks Group Inc.
(BGI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BGI: +35. 8%, PVH: -1. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BGI and PVH?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BGI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PVH is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.