BHAT
Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd.
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Market Cap$36K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
BHAT vs NVDA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
Semiconductors
Market Cap$5.14T
5Y Perf.+1864.5%
BHAT vs NVDA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | BHAT | NVDA |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $36K | $5.14T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $36M | $215.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-13M | $120.07B |
| Gross Margin | -0.3% | 71.1% |
| Operating Margin | -42.5% | 60.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 25.6x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $11.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14K | $10.61B |
BHAT vs NVDA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
BHAT
NVDA
| Stock | May 20 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fujian Blue Hat Int… (BHAT) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 1964.5 | +1864.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BHAT vs NVDA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: NVDA leads in 6 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BHAT
Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd.
The Specific-Use Pick
In this particular matchup, BHAT is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
Best for: technology exposure
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
The Income Pick
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.73, yield 0.0%
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 239.0% 10Y total return vs BHAT's -100.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NVDA | 65.5% revenue growth vs BHAT's -74.6% |
| Quality / Margins | NVDA | 55.6% margin vs BHAT's -36.0% |
| Stability / Safety | NVDA | Beta 1.73 vs BHAT's 1.88, lower leverage |
| Dividends | NVDA | 0.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | NVDA | +80.7% vs BHAT's -99.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NVDA | 58.1% ROA vs BHAT's -20.0%, ROIC 81.8% vs -8.5% |
BHAT vs NVDA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2023
FY 2026
BHAT vs NVDA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLNVDALAGGINGBHAT
BHATFujian Blue Hat Inter…
1leads
NVDANVIDIA Corporation
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BHATMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
NVDA5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
BHAT3/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
NVDA6/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
NVDA6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
NVDA2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 5935.7x BHAT's $36M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BHAT's -36.0%. On growth, BHAT holds the edge at +103.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BHATFujian Blue Hat I… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $36M | $215.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$15M | $133.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$13M | $120.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $96.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | +71.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -42.5% | +60.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -36.0% | +55.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -27.9% | +44.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +103.8% | +73.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -45.9% | +97.8% |
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
BHAT leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BHATFujian Blue Hat I… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35,893 | $5.14T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | $5.14T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.00x | 43.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.55x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 38.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 23.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 32.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 53.17x |
BHAT leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-27 for BHAT. NVDA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BHAT's 0.09x.
| Metric | BHATFujian Blue Hat I… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -27.0% | +76.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.0% | +58.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.5% | +81.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.4% | +97.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | $807M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14,300 | $10.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $11.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -116.06x | 545.03x |
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $142,893 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for BHAT. Over the past 12 months, NVDA leads with a +80.7% total return vs BHAT's -99.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 93.6% vs BHAT's -97.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BHATFujian Blue Hat I… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -99.9% | +12.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.9% | +80.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +625.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +1328.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +23902.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -97.6% | +93.6% |
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NVDA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NVDA is the less volatile stock with a 1.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BHAT's 1.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs BHAT's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BHATFujian Blue Hat I… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.88x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $109.50 | $216.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.02 | $112.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.1% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 15.0 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 164.5M |
NVDA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | BHATFujian Blue Hat I… | NVDANVIDIA Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $278.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 79 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
NVDA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BHAT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallNVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
BHAT vs NVDA: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BHAT or NVDA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74. 6% for Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd. (BHAT). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) offers the better valuation at 43. 2x trailing P/E (25. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) a "Buy" — based on 79 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BHAT or NVDA?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1329%, compared to -100.
0% for Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd. (BHAT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +239. 0% versus BHAT's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BHAT or NVDA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
73β versus Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd. 's 1. 88β — meaning BHAT is approximately 9% more volatile than NVDA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 9% for Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BHAT or NVDA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus -74. 6% for Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd. (BHAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NVIDIA Corporation grew EPS 66. 7% year-over-year, compared to -4666. 6% for Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BHAT or NVDA?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -50. 9% for Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd. — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -23. 8% for BHAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BHAT or NVDA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is BHAT or NVDA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+239.
0% 10Y return). Fujian Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology Ltd. (BHAT) carries a higher beta of 1. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NVDA: +239. 0%, BHAT: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BHAT and NVDA?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BHAT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(BHAT: 103.8% · NVDA: 73.2%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.