Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BILI vs HUYA vs IQ vs DOYU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Internet Content & Information
BILI vs HUYA vs IQ vs DOYU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Entertainment | Entertainment | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $7.32B | $481M | $1.18B | $142M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $29.38B | $6.11B | $27.11B | $4.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $220M | $-153M | $-390M | $-202M |
| Gross Margin | 35.9% | 12.7% | 21.9% | 9.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | -3.4% | 1.7% | -7.1% |
| Forward P/E | 3.1x | 4.0x | 4.8x | 4.3x |
| Total Debt | $5.15B | $49M | $14.19B | $16M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10.25B | $1.19B | $3.53B | $1.02B |
BILI vs HUYA vs IQ vs DOYU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bilibili Inc. (BILI) | 100 | 67.8 | -32.2% |
| HUYA Inc. (HUYA) | 100 | 20.6 | -79.4% |
| iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) | 100 | 7.3 | -92.7% |
| DouYu International… (DOYU) | 100 | 5.2 | -94.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BILI vs HUYA vs IQ vs DOYU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BILI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 19.1%, EPS growth 72.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
- 19.1% revenue growth vs DOYU's -22.8%
- Lower P/E (3.1x vs 4.3x)
- 0.8% margin vs DOYU's -4.8%
HUYA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -60.1% 10Y total return vs BILI's 95.6%
- +26.9% vs IQ's -36.0%
IQ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
DOYU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 0.4%, current ratio 3.63x
- Beta 1.10, yield 100.0%, current ratio 3.63x
- Beta 1.10 vs BILI's 1.77, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.1% revenue growth vs DOYU's -22.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.1x vs 4.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.8% margin vs DOYU's -4.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs BILI's 1.77, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HUYA's 56.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.9% vs IQ's -36.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.6% ROA vs DOYU's -4.7%, ROIC -8.4% vs -15.4% |
BILI vs HUYA vs IQ vs DOYU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BILI vs HUYA vs IQ vs DOYU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BILI leads in 2 of 6 categories
HUYA leads 1 • DOYU leads 1 • IQ leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BILI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BILI is the larger business by revenue, generating $29.4B annually — 7.0x DOYU's $4.2B. BILI is the more profitable business, keeping 0.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DOYU's -4.8%. On growth, BILI holds the edge at +19.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $29.4B | $6.1B | $27.1B | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $845M | -$120M | $6.3B | -$275M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $220M | -$153M | -$390M | -$202M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.3B | $0 | $466M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.9% | +12.7% | +21.9% | +9.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | -3.4% | +1.7% | -7.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.8% | -2.5% | -1.4% | -4.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | -1.9% | +1.7% | -5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.8% | +1.7% | -7.8% | +2.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +134.9% | -118.5% | -2.1% | +179.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — IQ and DOYU each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, IQ's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BILI's 38.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.3B | $481M | $1.2B | $142M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.6B | $314M | $2.7B | -$5M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -46.31x | -103.70x | 10.69x | -3.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3.06x | 3.97x | 4.83x | 4.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 38.62x | — | 10.27x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.86x | 0.54x | 0.27x | 0.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.42x | 0.67x | 0.60x | 0.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.69x | — | 4.13x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BILI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BILI delivers a 1.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-6 for DOYU. DOYU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQ's 1.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BILI scores 7/9 vs DOYU's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.6% | -2.4% | -2.9% | -6.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | -1.7% | -0.9% | -4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.4% | -1.7% | +5.8% | -15.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.1% | -2.1% | +7.8% | -10.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.36x | 0.01x | 1.06x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5.1B | -$1.1B | $10.7B | -$1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10.2B | $1.2B | $3.5B | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.1B | $49M | $14.2B | $16M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.10x | — | 0.77x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HUYA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HUYA five years ago would be worth $3,916 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $881 for IQ. Over the past 12 months, HUYA leads with a +26.9% total return vs IQ's -36.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DOYU at 31.1% vs IQ's -41.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.6% | +5.6% | -40.4% | -31.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +25.0% | +26.9% | -36.0% | -34.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.0% | +99.7% | -79.6% | +125.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.4% | -60.8% | -91.2% | -71.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.6% | -60.1% | -92.2% | -78.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.2% | +25.9% | -41.1% | +31.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HUYA and DOYU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DOYU is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BILI's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HUYA currently trades 64.9% from its 52-week high vs IQ's 42.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.77x | 1.17x | 1.43x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.40 | $4.93 | $2.84 | $9.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.45 | $2.21 | $1.07 | $4.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.4% | +64.9% | +42.6% | +50.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.4 | 54.2 | 45.6 | 47.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 1.0M | 11.1M | 26K |
Analyst Outlook
DOYU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BILI as "Buy", HUYA as "Buy", IQ as "Buy", DOYU as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 92.1% upside for DOYU (target: $9) vs 7.8% for HUYA (target: $3). For income investors, DOYU offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs HUYA's 56.67%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.00 | $3.45 | $2.16 | $9.03 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 15 | 22 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +56.7% | — | +100.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $12.34 | — | $68.16 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +7.6% | 0.0% | +10.9% |
BILI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HUYA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
BILI vs HUYA vs IQ vs DOYU: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BILI or HUYA or IQ or DOYU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bilibili Inc.
(BILI) is the stronger pick with 19. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 8% for DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU). iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) offers the better valuation at 10. 7x trailing P/E (4. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bilibili Inc. (BILI) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BILI or HUYA or IQ or DOYU?
On forward P/E, Bilibili Inc.
is actually cheaper at 3. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BILI or HUYA or IQ or DOYU?
Over the past 5 years, HUYA Inc.
(HUYA) delivered a total return of -60. 8%, compared to -91. 2% for iQIYI, Inc. (IQ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BILI returned +95. 6% versus IQ's -92. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BILI or HUYA or IQ or DOYU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
10β versus Bilibili Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning BILI is approximately 61% more volatile than DOYU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 106% for iQIYI, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BILI or HUYA or IQ or DOYU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bilibili Inc.
(BILI) is pulling ahead at 19. 1% versus -22. 8% for DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HUYA Inc. grew EPS 75. 0% year-over-year, compared to -969. 4% for DouYu International Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, BILI leads at 11. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BILI or HUYA or IQ or DOYU?
iQIYI, Inc.
(IQ) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 6% net margin versus -7. 0% for DouYu International Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 2. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IQ leads at 6. 2% versus -13. 2% for DOYU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BILI leads at 32. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BILI or HUYA or IQ or DOYU more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Bilibili Inc.
(BILI) trades at 3. 1x forward P/E versus 4. 8x for iQIYI, Inc. — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOYU: 92. 1% to $9. 03.
08Which pays a better dividend — BILI or HUYA or IQ or DOYU?
In this comparison, DOYU (100.
0% yield), HUYA (56. 7% yield) pay a dividend. BILI, IQ do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BILI or HUYA or IQ or DOYU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
10), 100. 0% yield). Bilibili Inc. (BILI) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DOYU: -78. 8%, BILI: +95. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BILI and HUYA and IQ and DOYU?
These companies operate in different sectors (BILI (Technology) and HUYA (Communication Services) and IQ (Communication Services) and DOYU (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BILI is a small-cap high-growth stock; HUYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IQ is a small-cap deep-value stock; DOYU is a small-cap income-oriented stock. HUYA, DOYU pay a dividend while BILI, IQ do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.