Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BIO vs DBVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
BIO vs DBVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $6.99B | $1721.78T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.59B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $169M | $-168M |
| Gross Margin | 51.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 9.2% | — |
| Forward P/E | 25.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $1.53B | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $532M | $194M |
BIO vs DBVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bio-Rad Laboratorie… (BIO) | 100 | 52.7 | -47.3% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 41.4 | -58.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BIO vs DBVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BIO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.92
- Rev growth 0.7%, EPS growth 142.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.7%
- 82.9% 10Y total return vs DBVT's -86.8%
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +114.1% vs BIO's +11.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.7% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.5% margin vs DBVT's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs DBVT's 1.26 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +114.1% vs BIO's +11.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.2% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
BIO vs DBVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BIO vs DBVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DBVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIO and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $2.6B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.6B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$315M | -$112M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $169M | -$168M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $357M | -$151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.9% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.8% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.5% | +91.5% |
Valuation Metrics
DBVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.0B | $1721.78T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.0B | $1721.78T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.29x | -0.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.17x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.80x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.71x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 0.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.67x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BIO leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BIO delivers a 2.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. DBVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BIO's 0.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIO scores 5/9 vs DBVT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.4% | -130.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | -89.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.9% | -145.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $999M | -$172M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $532M | $194M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $22M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.49x | -189.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DBVT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BIO five years ago would be worth $4,301 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,344 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +114.1% total return vs BIO's +11.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DBVT at 6.4% vs BIO's -11.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.2% | +5.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.9% | +114.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.5% | +20.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.0% | -66.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.9% | -86.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.9% | +6.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BIO and DBVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BIO is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DBVT's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $343.12 | $26.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $211.43 | $7.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.5% | +76.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.3 | 43.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 306K | 253K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BIO as "Buy" and DBVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 130.5% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 20.6% for BIO (target: $313).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $312.50 | $46.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.2% | 0.0% |
DBVT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BIO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
BIO vs DBVT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BIO or DBVT a better buy right now?
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
(BIO) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (25. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (BIO) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BIO or DBVT?
Over the past 5 years, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
(BIO) delivered a total return of -57. 0%, compared to -66. 6% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BIO returned +82. 9% versus DBVT's -86. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BIO or DBVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
(BIO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 92β versus DBV Technologies S. A. 's 1. 26β — meaning DBVT is approximately 36% more volatile than BIO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 21% for Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BIO or DBVT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
grew EPS 142. 6% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BIO or DBVT?
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
(BIO) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 4% net margin versus 0. 0% for DBV Technologies S. A. — meaning it keeps 29. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIO leads at 10. 5% versus 0. 0% for DBVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BIO leads at 52. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BIO or DBVT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 130.
5% to $46. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — BIO or DBVT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is BIO or DBVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
(BIO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BIO: +82. 9%, DBVT: -86. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BIO and DBVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BIO is a small-cap deep-value stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.