Agricultural Inputs
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BIOX vs AVD vs FMC vs CTVA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Inputs
Agricultural Inputs
Agricultural Inputs
BIOX vs AVD vs FMC vs CTVA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Inputs | Agricultural Inputs | Agricultural Inputs | Agricultural Inputs |
| Market Cap | $30M | $86M | $1.71B | $53.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $318M | $523M | $3.43B | $17.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-53M | $-46M | $-2.50B | $1.16B |
| Gross Margin | 39.1% | 29.2% | 35.3% | 33.5% |
| Operating Margin | 0.2% | 1.1% | -59.5% | 13.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.0x | 7.7x | 21.9x |
| Total Debt | $277M | $191M | $4.20B | $2.58B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $33M | $12M | $585M | $4.52B |
BIOX vs AVD vs FMC vs CTVA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bioceres Crop Solut… (BIOX) | 100 | 7.0 | -93.0% |
| American Vanguard C… (AVD) | 100 | 22.9 | -77.1% |
| FMC Corporation (FMC) | 100 | 13.6 | -86.4% |
| Corteva, Inc. (CTVA) | 100 | 297.1 | +197.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BIOX vs AVD vs FMC vs CTVA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BIOX plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
AVD is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.17, yield 2.9%, current ratio 1.77x
FMC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.63, yield 17.0%
- Lower P/E (7.7x vs 21.9x)
- 17.0% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs AVD's 2.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
CTVA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 2.9%, EPS growth 23.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.1%
- 186.7% 10Y total return vs FMC's -26.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.29, Low D/E 10.6%, current ratio 1.43x
- 2.9% revenue growth vs BIOX's -28.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.9% revenue growth vs BIOX's -28.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.7x vs 21.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.5% margin vs FMC's -72.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.29 vs BIOX's 1.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 17.0% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs AVD's 2.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.7% vs BIOX's -88.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.7% ROA vs FMC's -23.0%, ROIC 8.5% vs -21.2% |
BIOX vs AVD vs FMC vs CTVA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BIOX vs AVD vs FMC vs CTVA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CTVA leads in 4 of 6 categories
BIOX leads 1 • FMC leads 1 • AVD leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTVA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTVA is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.9B annually — 56.2x BIOX's $318M. CTVA is the more profitable business, keeping 6.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FMC's -72.9%. On growth, CTVA holds the edge at +11.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $318M | $523M | $3.4B | $17.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $21M | $20M | -$1.9B | $3.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$53M | -$46M | -$2.5B | $1.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $37M | -$41M | -$91M | $2.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.1% | +29.2% | +35.3% | +33.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.2% | +1.1% | -59.5% | +13.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -16.6% | -8.7% | -72.9% | +6.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | -7.8% | -2.7% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.4% | +6.7% | -4.1% | +11.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -37.3% | +53.3% | -17.8% | +12.6% |
Valuation Metrics
BIOX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, AVD's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BIOX's 20.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $30M | $86M | $1.7B | $53.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $274M | $265M | $5.3B | $51.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.58x | -1.71x | -0.77x | 49.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.00x | 7.68x | 21.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.01x | 10.45x | — | 13.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.09x | 0.17x | 0.49x | 3.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.10x | 0.44x | 0.82x | 2.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.85x | — | — | 18.86x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CTVA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CTVA delivers a 4.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-82 for FMC. CTVA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FMC's 2.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AVD scores 6/9 vs FMC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -16.7% | -21.9% | -82.3% | +4.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.7% | -7.1% | -23.0% | +2.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.5% | +1.3% | -21.2% | +8.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.8% | +1.7% | -25.9% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.94x | 0.99x | 2.00x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $244M | $179M | $3.6B | -$1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $33M | $12M | $585M | $4.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $277M | $191M | $4.2B | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.07x | 0.31x | -0.24x | 5.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CTVA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CTVA five years ago would be worth $16,828 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $317 for BIOX. Over the past 12 months, CTVA leads with a +27.7% total return vs BIOX's -88.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CTVA at 12.1% vs BIOX's -64.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -65.0% | -21.3% | -4.0% | +17.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -88.5% | -27.4% | -57.1% | +27.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.3% | -82.9% | -82.5% | +40.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.8% | -83.4% | -80.2% | +68.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.1% | -71.7% | -26.8% | +186.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -64.0% | -44.5% | -44.0% | +12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
CTVA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTVA is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BIOX's 1.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CTVA currently trades 92.3% from its 52-week high vs BIOX's 9.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.89x | 1.22x | 1.63x | 0.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.18 | $5.92 | $44.78 | $85.63 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.35 | $2.05 | $12.17 | $60.54 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.1% | +50.7% | +30.5% | +92.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.6 | 51.4 | 43.4 | 53.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 804K | 364K | 3.2M | 3.4M |
Analyst Outlook
FMC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AVD as "Buy", FMC as "Hold", CTVA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 466.7% upside for AVD (target: $17) vs 11.5% for CTVA (target: $88). For income investors, FMC offers the higher dividend yield at 17.01% vs CTVA's 0.89%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.00 | $15.58 | $88.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 | 42 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.9% | +17.0% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 7 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.09 | $2.33 | $0.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.1% | +1.7% | +0.1% | +2.0% |
CTVA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BIOX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
BIOX vs AVD vs FMC vs CTVA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BIOX or AVD or FMC or CTVA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Corteva, Inc.
(CTVA) is the stronger pick with 2. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 3% for Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. (BIOX). Corteva, Inc. (CTVA) offers the better valuation at 49. 4x trailing P/E (21. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Vanguard Corporation (AVD) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BIOX or AVD or FMC or CTVA?
On forward P/E, FMC Corporation is actually cheaper at 7.
7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BIOX or AVD or FMC or CTVA?
Over the past 5 years, Corteva, Inc.
(CTVA) delivered a total return of +68. 3%, compared to -96. 8% for Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. (BIOX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CTVA returned +193. 8% versus BIOX's -95. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BIOX or AVD or FMC or CTVA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Corteva, Inc.
(CTVA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. 's 1. 89β — meaning BIOX is approximately 613% more volatile than CTVA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Corteva, Inc. (CTVA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 2% for FMC Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BIOX or AVD or FMC or CTVA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Corteva, Inc.
(CTVA) is pulling ahead at 2. 9% versus -28. 3% for Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. (BIOX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Vanguard Corporation grew EPS 61. 1% year-over-year, compared to -1704. 7% for Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BIOX leads at 0. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BIOX or AVD or FMC or CTVA?
Corteva, Inc.
(CTVA) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 3% net margin versus -64. 6% for FMC Corporation — meaning it keeps 6. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTVA leads at 15. 1% versus -54. 4% for FMC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTVA leads at 43. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BIOX or AVD or FMC or CTVA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, FMC Corporation (FMC) trades at 7.
7x forward P/E versus 21. 9x for Corteva, Inc. — 14. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVD: 466. 7% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BIOX or AVD or FMC or CTVA?
In this comparison, FMC (17.
0% yield), AVD (2. 9% yield), CTVA (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. BIOX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BIOX or AVD or FMC or CTVA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Corteva, Inc.
(CTVA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 27), 0. 9% yield, +193. 8% 10Y return). Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. (BIOX) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTVA: +193. 8%, BIOX: -95. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BIOX and AVD and FMC and CTVA?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BIOX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AVD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FMC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CTVA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. AVD, FMC, CTVA pay a dividend while BIOX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.