Diversified Utilities
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BIP vs AWK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
BIP vs AWK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Diversified Utilities | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $17.07B | $24.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24.01B | $5.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $417M | $1.10B |
| Gross Margin | 27.0% | 43.6% |
| Operating Margin | 25.2% | 36.5% |
| Forward P/E | 30.9x | 20.7x |
| Total Debt | $64.50B | $15.92B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.20B | $119M |
BIP vs AWK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brookfield Infrastr… (BIP) | 100 | 136.3 | +36.3% |
| American Water Work… (AWK) | 100 | 99.4 | -0.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BIP vs AWK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BIP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 10.3%
- Rev growth 9.8%, EPS growth 7.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.0%
- 195.1% 10Y total return vs AWK's 100.9%
AWK is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and stability.
- 21.2% margin vs BIP's 1.7%
- Lower D/E ratio (146.9% vs 181.6%)
- 3.1% ROA vs BIP's 0.3%, ROIC 5.5% vs 4.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.8% revenue growth vs AWK's 9.7% | |
| Value | PEG 0.92 vs 2.63 | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.2% margin vs BIP's 1.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (146.9% vs 181.6%) | |
| Dividends | 10.3% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs AWK's 2.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.3% vs AWK's -12.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.1% ROA vs BIP's 0.3%, ROIC 5.5% vs 4.8% |
BIP vs AWK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BIP vs AWK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AWK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIP is the larger business by revenue, generating $24.0B annually — 4.6x AWK's $5.2B. AWK is the more profitable business, keeping 21.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BIP's 1.7%. On growth, BIP holds the edge at +16.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $24.0B | $5.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10.2B | $2.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $417M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13.7B | -$1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.0% | +43.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +36.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +21.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -57.2% | -23.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.9% | +5.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.2% | -3.8% |
Valuation Metrics
BIP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.1x trailing earnings, AWK trades at a 41% valuation discount to BIP's 37.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BIP offers better value at 1.12x vs AWK's 2.81x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17.1B | $24.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $78.4B | $40.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.69x | 22.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.91x | 20.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.12x | 2.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.98x | 14.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.74x | 4.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.48x | 2.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AWK leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AWK delivers a 10.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $1 for BIP. AWK carries lower financial leverage with a 1.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BIP's 1.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIP scores 8/9 vs AWK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.2% | +10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.3% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | +5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.82x | 1.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $61.3B | $15.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.2B | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $64.5B | $15.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.81x | 3.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BIP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BIP five years ago would be worth $12,535 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,192 for AWK. Over the past 12 months, BIP leads with a +22.3% total return vs AWK's -12.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BIP at 5.6% vs AWK's -2.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.0% | -2.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.3% | -12.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.8% | -8.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.3% | -8.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +195.1% | +100.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.6% | -2.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BIP and AWK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AWK is the less volatile stock with a -0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BIP's 0.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BIP currently trades 91.6% from its 52-week high vs AWK's 84.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | -0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.32 | $150.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.63 | $121.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.6% | +84.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.9 | 33.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
BIP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BIP as "Buy" and AWK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 25.1% upside for BIP (target: $46) vs 6.7% for AWK (target: $135). For income investors, BIP offers the higher dividend yield at 10.26% vs AWK's 2.57%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.20 | $134.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +10.3% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.79 | $3.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | 0.0% |
BIP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). AWK leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
BIP vs AWK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BIP or AWK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.
P. (BIP) is the stronger pick with 9. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 7% for American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK). American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK) offers the better valuation at 22. 1x trailing P/E (20. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. (BIP) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BIP or AWK?
On trailing P/E, American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the cheapest at 22. 1x versus Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. at 37. 7x. On forward P/E, American Water Works Company, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. wins at 0. 92x versus American Water Works Company, Inc. 's 2. 63x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BIP or AWK?
Over the past 5 years, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.
P. (BIP) delivered a total return of +25. 3%, compared to -8. 1% for American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BIP returned +195. 1% versus AWK's +100. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BIP or AWK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 48β versus Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. 's 0. 63β — meaning BIP is approximately -231% more volatile than AWK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 147% versus 182% for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BIP or AWK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.
P. (BIP) is pulling ahead at 9. 8% versus 9. 7% for American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. grew EPS 716. 7% year-over-year, compared to 5. 8% for American Water Works Company, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BIP leads at 17. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BIP or AWK?
American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 6% net margin versus 1. 9% for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. — meaning it keeps 21. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWK leads at 36. 6% versus 25. 1% for BIP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AWK leads at 43. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BIP or AWK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. (BIP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 92x versus American Water Works Company, Inc. 's 2. 63x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK) trades at 20. 7x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. — 10. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BIP: 25. 1% to $46. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — BIP or AWK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. (BIP) offers the highest yield at 10. 3%, versus 2. 6% for American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK).
09Is BIP or AWK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 48), 2. 6% yield, +100. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWK: +100. 9%, BIP: +195. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BIP and AWK?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BIP is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; AWK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.