Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BIPI vs BAM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
BIPI vs BAM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | — | $81.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $334.79B | $3.98B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $104.03B | $2.60B |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 71.0% |
| Operating Margin | 96.8% | 69.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 26.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.07T | $219M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23.68B | $12M |
BIPI vs BAM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BIP Bermuda Holding… (BIPI) | 100 | 102.4 | +2.4% |
| Brookfield Asset Ma… (BAM) | 100 | 170.1 | +70.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BIPI vs BAM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BIPI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.64
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 54.0%, current ratio 1.92x
- Beta 0.64, current ratio 1.92x
BAM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 68.2% 10Y total return vs BIPI's -13.4%
- 54.5% margin vs BIPI's 31.1%
- 0.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quality / Margins | 54.5% margin vs BIPI's 31.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs BAM's 1.50 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.9% vs BAM's -9.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.8% ROA vs BIPI's 5.3%, ROIC 71.0% vs 9.5% |
BIPI vs BAM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIPI leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIPI is the larger business by revenue, generating $334.8B annually — 84.1x BAM's $4.0B. BAM is the more profitable business, keeping 54.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BIPI's 31.1%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $334.8B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $3.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $2.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $1.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +71.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +96.8% | +69.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | +54.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | +15.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +44.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $81.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | $82.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 38.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 26.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 29.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 20.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 24.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 130.58x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BAM leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BAM delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $5 for BIPI. BAM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BIPI's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIPI scores 8/9 vs BAM's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.3% | +24.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | +15.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.5% | +71.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +24.6% | +103.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.05T | $207M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23.7B | $12M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.07T | $219M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 9.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BAM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BAM five years ago would be worth $16,823 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,664 for BIPI. Over the past 12 months, BIPI leads with a +7.9% total return vs BAM's -9.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BAM at 17.5% vs BIPI's 7.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.1% | -7.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.9% | -9.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.7% | +62.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.4% | +68.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.4% | +68.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.9% | +17.5% |
Risk & Volatility
BIPI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BIPI is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BAM's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BIPI currently trades 91.3% from its 52-week high vs BAM's 76.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.64x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.18 | $64.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.44 | $42.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.3% | +76.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.9 | 59.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 3.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
BAM is the only dividend payer here at 0.77% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $61.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.38 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | +0.0% |
BIPI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). BAM leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
BIPI vs BAM: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BIPI or BAM a better buy right now?
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.
(BAM) offers the better valuation at 38. 1x trailing P/E (26. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BIPI or BAM?
Over the past 5 years, Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.
(BAM) delivered a total return of +68. 2%, compared to -13. 4% for BIP Bermuda Holdings I Limited (BIPI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BAM returned +68. 2% versus BIPI's -13. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BIPI or BAM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BIP Bermuda Holdings I Limited (BIPI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
64β versus Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. 's 1. 50β — meaning BAM is approximately 134% more volatile than BIPI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 54% for BIP Bermuda Holdings I Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — BIPI or BAM?
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.
(BAM) is the more profitable company, earning 54. 5% net margin versus 31. 1% for BIP Bermuda Holdings I Limited — meaning it keeps 54. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIPI leads at 96. 8% versus 69. 4% for BAM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BIPI leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — BIPI or BAM?
In this comparison, BAM (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. BIPI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is BIPI or BAM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BIP Bermuda Holdings I Limited (BIPI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
64)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BIPI: -13. 4%, BAM: +68. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between BIPI and BAM?
These companies operate in different sectors (BIPI (Industrials) and BAM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
BAM pays a dividend while BIPI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.