Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BIRK vs CROX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
BIRK vs CROX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories |
| Market Cap | $7.28B | $5.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.14B | $4.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $379M | $-104M |
| Gross Margin | 58.3% | 58.1% |
| Operating Margin | 26.4% | 21.5% |
| Forward P/E | 19.0x | 7.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.31B | $1.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $329M | $130M |
BIRK vs CROX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Birkenstock Holding… (BIRK) | 100 | 101.4 | +1.4% |
| Crocs, Inc. (CROX) | 100 | 118.4 | +18.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BIRK vs CROX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BIRK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.20
- Rev growth 16.2%, EPS growth 83.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.20, Low D/E 48.1%, current ratio 3.30x
CROX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 12.1% 10Y total return vs BIRK's -1.5%
- Beta 1.18, current ratio 1.27x
- Lower P/E (7.9x vs 19.0x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.2% revenue growth vs CROX's -1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.9x vs 19.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.7% margin vs CROX's -2.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.18 vs BIRK's 1.20 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.1% vs BIRK's -23.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.7% ROA vs CROX's -2.4%, ROIC 11.3% vs 21.7% |
BIRK vs CROX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BIRK vs CROX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIRK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CROX is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 1.9x BIRK's $2.1B. BIRK is the more profitable business, keeping 17.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CROX's -2.6%. On growth, BIRK holds the edge at +11.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $687M | $946M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $379M | -$104M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $282M | $671M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.3% | +58.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.4% | +21.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | -2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +16.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.1% | -1.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +145.5% | -4.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CROX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CROX's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BIRK's 10.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.3B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.4B | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.04x | -70.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.04x | 7.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.94x | 7.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.96x | 1.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.31x | 4.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.53x | 8.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BIRK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BIRK delivers a 13.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-8 for CROX. BIRK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CROX's 1.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIRK scores 9/9 vs CROX's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.7% | -7.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.7% | -2.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.3% | +21.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.3% | +23.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 1.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.0B | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $329M | $130M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.04x | 10.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CROX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CROX five years ago would be worth $9,960 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,851 for BIRK. Over the past 12 months, CROX leads with a +7.1% total return vs BIRK's -23.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BIRK at -0.5% vs CROX's -3.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.2% | +21.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.5% | +7.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.5% | -9.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.5% | -0.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.5% | +1212.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.5% | -3.2% |
Risk & Volatility
CROX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CROX is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BIRK's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CROX currently trades 86.1% from its 52-week high vs BIRK's 66.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $59.50 | $122.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.06 | $73.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.6% | +86.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.4 | 58.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
BIRK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BIRK as "Buy" and CROX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 40.3% upside for BIRK (target: $56) vs 1.1% for CROX (target: $107).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $55.54 | $106.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.1% | +11.1% |
BIRK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CROX leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
BIRK vs CROX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BIRK or CROX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) is the stronger pick with 16.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for Crocs, Inc. (CROX). Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) offers the better valuation at 18. 0x trailing P/E (19. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BIRK or CROX?
On forward P/E, Crocs, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 7. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BIRK or CROX?
Over the past 5 years, Crocs, Inc.
(CROX) delivered a total return of -0. 4%, compared to -1. 5% for Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CROX returned +1212% versus BIRK's -1. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BIRK or CROX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Crocs, Inc.
(CROX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 18β versus Birkenstock Holding plc's 1. 20β — meaning BIRK is approximately 2% more volatile than CROX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 125% for Crocs, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BIRK or CROX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) is pulling ahead at 16.
2% versus -1. 5% for Crocs, Inc. (CROX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Birkenstock Holding plc grew EPS 83. 3% year-over-year, compared to -109. 4% for Crocs, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BIRK leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BIRK or CROX?
Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
6% net margin versus -2. 0% for Crocs, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIRK leads at 26. 2% versus 22. 0% for CROX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BIRK leads at 59. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BIRK or CROX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Crocs, Inc.
(CROX) trades at 7. 9x forward P/E versus 19. 0x for Birkenstock Holding plc — 11. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BIRK: 40. 3% to $55. 54.
08Which pays a better dividend — BIRK or CROX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is BIRK or CROX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Crocs, Inc.
(CROX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 18), +1212% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CROX: +1212%, BIRK: -1. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BIRK and CROX?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BIRK is a small-cap high-growth stock; CROX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.