Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BIRK vs CROX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BIRK
Birkenstock Holding plc

Apparel - Footwear & Accessories

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • GB
Market Cap$7.28B
5Y Perf.+1.4%
CROX
Crocs, Inc.

Apparel - Footwear & Accessories

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.29B
5Y Perf.+18.4%

BIRK vs CROX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BIRK logoBIRK
CROX logoCROX
IndustryApparel - Footwear & AccessoriesApparel - Footwear & Accessories
Market Cap$7.28B$5.29B
Revenue (TTM)$2.14B$4.02B
Net Income (TTM)$379M$-104M
Gross Margin58.3%58.1%
Operating Margin26.4%21.5%
Forward P/E19.0x7.9x
Total Debt$1.31B$1.61B
Cash & Equiv.$329M$130M

BIRK vs CROXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BIRK
CROX
StockOct 23May 26Return
Birkenstock Holding… (BIRK)100101.4+1.4%
Crocs, Inc. (CROX)100118.4+18.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BIRK vs CROX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BIRK and CROX are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Crocs, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BIRK
Birkenstock Holding plc
The Income Pick

BIRK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.20
  • Rev growth 16.2%, EPS growth 83.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.20, Low D/E 48.1%, current ratio 3.30x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
CROX
Crocs, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CROX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.

  • 12.1% 10Y total return vs BIRK's -1.5%
  • Beta 1.18, current ratio 1.27x
  • Lower P/E (7.9x vs 19.0x)
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBIRK logoBIRK16.2% revenue growth vs CROX's -1.5%
ValueCROX logoCROXLower P/E (7.9x vs 19.0x)
Quality / MarginsBIRK logoBIRK17.7% margin vs CROX's -2.6%
Stability / SafetyCROX logoCROXBeta 1.18 vs BIRK's 1.20
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CROX logoCROX+7.1% vs BIRK's -23.5%
Efficiency (ROA)BIRK logoBIRK7.7% ROA vs CROX's -2.4%, ROIC 11.3% vs 21.7%

BIRK vs CROX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BIRKBirkenstock Holding plc

Segment breakdown not available.

CROXCrocs, Inc.
FY 2025
Crocs Brand Segment
82.3%$3.3B
HEYDUDE Brand Segment
17.7%$715M

BIRK vs CROX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBIRKLAGGINGCROX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BIRK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

CROX is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 1.9x BIRK's $2.1B. BIRK is the more profitable business, keeping 17.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CROX's -2.6%. On growth, BIRK holds the edge at +11.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBIRK logoBIRKBirkenstock Holdi…CROX logoCROXCrocs, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.1B$4.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$687M$946M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$379M-$104M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$282M$671M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+58.3%+58.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+26.4%+21.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+17.7%-2.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+13.2%+16.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.1%-1.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+145.5%-4.2%
BIRK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CROX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CROX's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BIRK's 10.9x.

MetricBIRK logoBIRKBirkenstock Holdi…CROX logoCROXCrocs, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$7.3B$5.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$8.4B$6.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.04x-70.50x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.04x7.93x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.94x7.01x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.96x1.31x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.31x4.43x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.53x8.03x
CROX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BIRK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

BIRK delivers a 13.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-8 for CROX. BIRK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CROX's 1.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIRK scores 9/9 vs CROX's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBIRK logoBIRKBirkenstock Holdi…CROX logoCROXCrocs, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.7%-7.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+7.7%-2.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+11.3%+21.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+12.3%+23.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–995
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.48x1.25x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.0B$1.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$329M$130M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.3B$1.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense10.04x10.07x
BIRK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CROX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CROX five years ago would be worth $9,960 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,851 for BIRK. Over the past 12 months, CROX leads with a +7.1% total return vs BIRK's -23.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BIRK at -0.5% vs CROX's -3.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBIRK logoBIRKBirkenstock Holdi…CROX logoCROXCrocs, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-5.2%+21.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-23.5%+7.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-1.5%-9.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-1.5%-0.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-1.5%+1212.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-0.5%-3.2%
CROX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CROX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CROX is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BIRK's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CROX currently trades 86.1% from its 52-week high vs BIRK's 66.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBIRK logoBIRKBirkenstock Holdi…CROX logoCROXCrocs, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.20x1.18x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$59.50$122.84
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$33.06$73.21
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+66.6%+86.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.458.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.1M1.2M
CROX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

BIRK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates BIRK as "Buy" and CROX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 40.3% upside for BIRK (target: $56) vs 1.1% for CROX (target: $107).

MetricBIRK logoBIRKBirkenstock Holdi…CROX logoCROXCrocs, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$55.54$106.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts1637
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises20
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.1%+11.1%
BIRK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

BIRK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CROX leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).

Best OverallBirkenstock Holding plc (BIRK)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BIRK vs CROX: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BIRK or CROX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) is the stronger pick with 16.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for Crocs, Inc. (CROX). Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) offers the better valuation at 18. 0x trailing P/E (19. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BIRK or CROX?

On forward P/E, Crocs, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 7. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BIRK or CROX?

Over the past 5 years, Crocs, Inc.

(CROX) delivered a total return of -0. 4%, compared to -1. 5% for Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CROX returned +1212% versus BIRK's -1. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BIRK or CROX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Crocs, Inc.

(CROX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 18β versus Birkenstock Holding plc's 1. 20β — meaning BIRK is approximately 2% more volatile than CROX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 125% for Crocs, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BIRK or CROX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) is pulling ahead at 16.

2% versus -1. 5% for Crocs, Inc. (CROX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Birkenstock Holding plc grew EPS 83. 3% year-over-year, compared to -109. 4% for Crocs, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BIRK leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BIRK or CROX?

Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) is the more profitable company, earning 16.

6% net margin versus -2. 0% for Crocs, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIRK leads at 26. 2% versus 22. 0% for CROX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BIRK leads at 59. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BIRK or CROX more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Crocs, Inc.

(CROX) trades at 7. 9x forward P/E versus 19. 0x for Birkenstock Holding plc — 11. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BIRK: 40. 3% to $55. 54.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BIRK or CROX?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is BIRK or CROX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Crocs, Inc.

(CROX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 18), +1212% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CROX: +1212%, BIRK: -1. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BIRK and CROX?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BIRK is a small-cap high-growth stock; CROX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

BIRK

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CROX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 34%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BIRK and CROX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BIRK: 11.1% · CROX: -1.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.