BIRK
Birkenstock Holding plc
Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
Market Cap$7.28B
5Y Perf.-0.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
BIRK vs WWW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
WWW
Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
Market Cap$1.41B
5Y Perf.+111.4%
BIRK vs WWW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | BIRK | WWW |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories |
| Market Cap | $7.28B | $1.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.14B | $1.87B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $379M | $95M |
| Gross Margin | 58.3% | 47.2% |
| Operating Margin | 26.4% | 7.9% |
| Forward P/E | 18.8x | 12.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.31B | $652M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $329M | $206M |
BIRK vs WWW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
BIRK
WWW
| Stock | Oct 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Birkenstock Holding… (BIRK) | 100 | 100.0 | -0.0% |
| Wolverine World Wid… (WWW) | 100 | 211.4 | +111.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BIRK vs WWW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: BIRK leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Wolverine World Wide, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BIRK
Birkenstock Holding plc
The Income Pick
BIRK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.20
- Rev growth 16.2%, EPS growth 83.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.20, Low D/E 48.1%, current ratio 3.30x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
WWW
Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
WWW is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 10.4% 10Y total return vs BIRK's -1.5%
- Lower P/E (12.8x vs 18.8x)
- 2.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BIRK | 16.2% revenue growth vs WWW's 6.8% |
| Value | WWW | Lower P/E (12.8x vs 18.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | BIRK | 17.7% margin vs WWW's 5.1% |
| Stability / Safety | BIRK | Beta 1.20 vs WWW's 1.74, lower leverage |
| Dividends | WWW | 2.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | WWW | +23.9% vs BIRK's -23.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | BIRK | 7.7% ROA vs WWW's 5.5%, ROIC 11.3% vs 11.6% |
BIRK vs WWW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
BIRK vs WWW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLBIRKLAGGINGWWW
WWWWolverine World Wide,…
3leads
BIRKBirkenstock Holding p…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs WWWMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
BIRK5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
WWW4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
WWW5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
WWW5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
BIRK2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
BIRK1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIRK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIRK and WWW operate at a comparable scale, with $2.1B and $1.9B in trailing revenue. BIRK is the more profitable business, keeping 17.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WWW's 5.1%. On growth, BIRK holds the edge at +11.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BIRKBirkenstock Holdi… | WWWWolverine World W… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $687M | $163M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $379M | $95M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $282M | $126M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.3% | +47.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.4% | +7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +5.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +6.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.1% | +4.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +145.5% | +102.0% |
BIRK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
WWW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.2x trailing earnings, WWW trades at a 99% valuation discount to BIRK's 18.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BIRK's 10.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WWW's 12.4x.
| Metric | BIRKBirkenstock Holdi… | WWWWolverine World W… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.3B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.4B | $1.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.04x | 0.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.78x | 12.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.94x | 12.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.96x | 0.75x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.31x | 2.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.53x | 11.27x |
WWW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WWW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WWW delivers a 17.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $14 for BIRK. BIRK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WWW's 1.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIRK scores 9/9 vs WWW's 8/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | BIRKBirkenstock Holdi… | WWWWolverine World W… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.7% | +17.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.7% | +5.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.3% | +11.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.3% | +12.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 1.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.0B | $446M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $329M | $206M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $652M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.04x | 3.19x |
WWW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WWW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BIRK five years ago would be worth $9,851 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,446 for WWW. Over the past 12 months, WWW leads with a +23.9% total return vs BIRK's -23.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WWW at 5.8% vs BIRK's -0.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BIRKBirkenstock Holdi… | WWWWolverine World W… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.2% | -4.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.5% | +23.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.5% | +18.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.5% | -55.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.5% | +10.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.5% | +5.8% |
WWW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BIRK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BIRK is the less volatile stock with a 1.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WWW's 1.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BIRK currently trades 66.6% from its 52-week high vs WWW's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BIRKBirkenstock Holdi… | WWWWolverine World W… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 1.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $59.50 | $32.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.06 | $13.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.6% | +52.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.4 | 46.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 1.0M |
BIRK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
BIRK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BIRK as "Buy" and WWW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 40.3% upside for BIRK (target: $56) vs 23.7% for WWW (target: $21). WWW is the only dividend payer here at 2.36% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | BIRKBirkenstock Holdi… | WWWWolverine World W… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $55.54 | $21.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.1% | +1.0% |
BIRK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
BIRK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). WWW leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
Best OverallBirkenstock Holding plc (BIRK)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
BIRK vs WWW: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BIRK or WWW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) is the stronger pick with 16.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 8% for Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW). Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW) offers the better valuation at 0. 2x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BIRK or WWW?
On trailing P/E, Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
(WWW) is the cheapest at 0. 2x versus Birkenstock Holding plc at 18. 0x. On forward P/E, Wolverine World Wide, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BIRK or WWW?
Over the past 5 years, Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) delivered a total return of -1.
5%, compared to -55. 5% for Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WWW returned +7. 2% versus BIRK's -2. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BIRK or WWW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
20β versus Wolverine World Wide, Inc. 's 1. 74β — meaning WWW is approximately 45% more volatile than BIRK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 122% for Wolverine World Wide, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BIRK or WWW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) is pulling ahead at 16.
2% versus 6. 8% for Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wolverine World Wide, Inc. grew EPS 159. 5% year-over-year, compared to 83. 3% for Birkenstock Holding plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, BIRK leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BIRK or WWW?
Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
6% net margin versus 5. 1% for Wolverine World Wide, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIRK leads at 26. 2% versus 8. 0% for WWW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BIRK leads at 59. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BIRK or WWW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
(WWW) trades at 12. 8x forward P/E versus 18. 8x for Birkenstock Holding plc — 6. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BIRK: 40. 3% to $55. 54.
08Which pays a better dividend — BIRK or WWW?
In this comparison, WWW (2.
4% yield) pays a dividend. BIRK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BIRK or WWW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
(WWW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WWW: +7. 2%, BIRK: -2. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BIRK and WWW?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BIRK is a small-cap high-growth stock; WWW is a small-cap deep-value stock. WWW pays a dividend while BIRK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(BIRK: 11.1% · WWW: 4.6%)Net Margin>
%
(BIRK: 17.7% · WWW: 5.1%)P/E Ratio<
x
(BIRK: 18.0x · WWW: 0.2x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.