Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BK vs TROW

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BK
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$91.98B
5Y Perf.+259.5%
TROW
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$23.09B
5Y Perf.-12.2%

BK vs TROW — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BK logoBK
TROW logoTROW
IndustryAsset ManagementAsset Management
Market Cap$91.98B$23.09B
Revenue (TTM)$39.55B$7.31B
Net Income (TTM)$5.24B$2.09B
Gross Margin46.0%62.7%
Operating Margin14.8%29.9%
Forward P/E15.3x11.5x
Total Debt$45.44B$860M
Cash & Equiv.$101.94B$3.38B

BK vs TROWLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BK
TROW
StockMay 20May 26Return
The Bank of New Yor… (BK)100359.5+259.5%
T. Rowe Price Group… (TROW)10087.8-12.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BK vs TROW

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BK leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BK
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
The Banking Pick

BK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 1.3%
  • Rev growth 17.1%, EPS growth 49.1%
  • 273.1% 10Y total return vs TROW's 96.8%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
TROW
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

TROW is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive and bank quality.

  • Beta 1.18, yield 4.8%, current ratio 73.08x
  • NIM 3.4% vs BK's 1.0%
  • Lower P/E (11.5x vs 15.3x)
Best for: defensive and bank quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBK logoBK17.1% NII/revenue growth vs TROW's 3.1%
ValueTROW logoTROWLower P/E (11.5x vs 15.3x)
Quality / MarginsBK logoBKEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs TROW's 0.3% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyBK logoBKBeta 0.83 vs TROW's 1.18
DividendsBK logoBK1.3% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs TROW's 4.8%
Momentum (1Y)BK logoBK+63.7% vs TROW's +23.4%
Efficiency (ROA)BK logoBKEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs TROW's 0.3%

BK vs TROW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BKThe Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
FY 2024
Financial Service
73.9%$9.3B
Investment Advisory, Management and Administrative Service
24.9%$3.1B
Distribution and Shareholder Service
1.2%$158M
TROWT. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Asset Management
98.8%$6.6B
Capital Allocation Based Income
1.2%$81M

BK vs TROW — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTROWLAGGINGBK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TROW leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

BK is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.6B annually — 5.4x TROW's $7.3B. TROW is the more profitable business, keeping 28.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BK's 11.5%.

MetricBK logoBKThe Bank of New Y…TROW logoTROWT. Rowe Price Gro…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$39.6B$7.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$8.4B$2.7B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$5.2B$2.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.6B$2.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+46.0%+62.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+14.8%+29.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.5%+28.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.0%+20.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+25.3%+3.7%
TROW leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TROW leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 11.5x trailing earnings, TROW trades at a 50% valuation discount to BK's 23.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BK's 4.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TROW's 7.9x.

MetricBK logoBKThe Bank of New Y…TROW logoTROWT. Rowe Price Gro…
Market CapShares × price$92.0B$23.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$35.5B$20.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS23.04x11.47x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.26x11.49x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.47x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple4.64x7.85x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.33x3.16x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.39x1.97x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.61x
TROW leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TROW leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

TROW delivers a 17.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $12 for BK. TROW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BK's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BK scores 6/9 vs TROW's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricBK logoBKThe Bank of New Y…TROW logoTROWT. Rowe Price Gro…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.8%+17.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.2%+14.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.0%+13.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.5%+15.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–964
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.09x0.07x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$56.5B-$2.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$101.9B$3.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$45.4B$860M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.32x
TROW leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BK five years ago would be worth $27,396 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,079 for TROW. Over the past 12 months, BK leads with a +63.7% total return vs TROW's +23.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BK at 49.7% vs TROW's 4.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBK logoBKThe Bank of New Y…TROW logoTROWT. Rowe Price Gro…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+15.1%+2.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+63.7%+23.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+235.7%+13.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+174.0%-29.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+273.1%+96.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+49.7%+4.4%
BK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

BK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

BK is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TROW's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BK currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs TROW's 89.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBK logoBKThe Bank of New Y…TROW logoTROWT. Rowe Price Gro…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.83x1.18x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$139.15$118.22
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$81.12$85.51
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.0%+89.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.374.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.3M2.3M
BK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — BK and TROW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates BK as "Buy" and TROW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 4.7% upside for BK (target: $140) vs -4.6% for TROW (target: $101). For income investors, TROW offers the higher dividend yield at 4.81% vs BK's 1.35%.

MetricBK logoBKThe Bank of New Y…TROW logoTROWT. Rowe Price Gro…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$139.86$101.20
# AnalystsCovering analysts3538
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.3%+4.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises143
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.80$5.11
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.3%+2.7%
Evenly matched — BK and TROW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TROW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BK leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.

Best OverallT. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BK vs TROW: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BK or TROW a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) is the stronger pick with 17.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 1% for T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW). T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) a "Buy" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BK or TROW?

On trailing P/E, T.

Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) is the cheapest at 11. 5x versus The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation at 23. 0x. On forward P/E, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BK or TROW?

Over the past 5 years, The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) delivered a total return of +174.

0%, compared to -29. 2% for T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BK returned +273. 1% versus TROW's +96. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BK or TROW?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

83β versus T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. 's 1. 18β — meaning TROW is approximately 42% more volatile than BK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 109% for The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BK or TROW?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) is pulling ahead at 17.

1% versus 3. 1% for T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation grew EPS 49. 1% year-over-year, compared to 1. 1% for T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BK or TROW?

T.

Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 5% net margin versus 11. 5% for The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation — meaning it keeps 28. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TROW leads at 29. 9% versus 14. 8% for BK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TROW leads at 62. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BK or TROW more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, T.

Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 15. 3x for The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation — 3. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BK: 4. 7% to $139. 86.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BK or TROW?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) offers the highest yield at 4. 8%, versus 1. 3% for The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK).

09

Is BK or TROW better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

83), 1. 3% yield, +273. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BK: +273. 1%, TROW: +96. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BK and TROW?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BK is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TROW is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

BK

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TROW

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 17%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.9%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BK and TROW on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BK: 17.1% · TROW: 3.1%)
Net Margin>
%
(BK: 11.5% · TROW: 28.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(BK: 23.0x · TROW: 11.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.