Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BKE vs ANF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
BKE vs ANF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $2.77B | $3.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.28B | $5.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $206M | $507M |
| Gross Margin | 48.9% | 58.6% |
| Operating Margin | 20.1% | 13.4% |
| Forward P/E | 13.4x | 8.1x |
| Total Debt | $326M | $1.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $267M | $760M |
BKE vs ANF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Buckle, Inc. (BKE) | 100 | 387.4 | +287.4% |
| Abercrombie & Fitch… (ANF) | 100 | 683.0 | +583.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BKE vs ANF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BKE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 7.2%
- 237.6% 10Y total return vs ANF's 229.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 77.0%, current ratio 2.05x
ANF is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth -2.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.5%
- 6.4% revenue growth vs BKE's -3.4%
- Lower P/E (8.1x vs 13.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.4% revenue growth vs BKE's -3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 13.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.1% margin vs ANF's 9.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs ANF's 1.42, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.2% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +65.5% vs ANF's +14.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.6% ROA vs ANF's 15.1%, ROIC 38.4% vs 31.4% |
BKE vs ANF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BKE vs ANF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ANF is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.3B annually — 4.1x BKE's $1.3B. BKE is the more profitable business, keeping 16.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ANF's 9.6%. On growth, BKE holds the edge at +9.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $5.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $282M | $862M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $206M | $507M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $215M | $378M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.9% | +58.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.1% | +13.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.1% | +9.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +7.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.3% | +5.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.1% | +3.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ANF leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.6x trailing earnings, ANF trades at a 46% valuation discount to BKE's 14.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ANF's 4.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BKE's 10.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $3.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.02x | 7.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.41x | 8.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.10x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.74x | 4.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.27x | 0.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.48x | 2.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.87x | 9.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BKE leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BKE delivers a 44.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $39 for ANF. BKE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.77x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ANF's 0.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ANF scores 5/9 vs BKE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +44.4% | +38.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +20.6% | +15.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +38.4% | +31.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +35.3% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.77x | 0.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $59M | $409M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $267M | $760M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $326M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 302.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — BKE and ANF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ANF five years ago would be worth $19,540 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,096 for BKE. Over the past 12 months, BKE leads with a +65.5% total return vs ANF's +14.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANF at 50.5% vs BKE's 26.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.2% | -35.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +65.5% | +14.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.2% | +240.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.0% | +95.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +237.6% | +229.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.0% | +50.5% |
Risk & Volatility
BKE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BKE is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ANF's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BKE currently trades 88.4% from its 52-week high vs ANF's 59.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.89x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $61.69 | $133.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.95 | $65.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.4% | +59.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.8 | 30.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 393K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BKE as "Hold" and ANF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 52.2% upside for ANF (target: $121) vs -2.8% for BKE (target: $53). BKE is the only dividend payer here at 7.22% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $53.00 | $120.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.94 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +12.4% |
BKE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ANF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BKE vs ANF: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BKE or ANF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) is the stronger pick with 6. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for The Buckle, Inc. (BKE). Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) offers the better valuation at 7. 6x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Buckle, Inc. (BKE) a "Hold" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BKE or ANF?
On trailing P/E, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) is the cheapest at 7. 6x versus The Buckle, Inc. at 14. 0x. On forward P/E, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BKE or ANF?
Over the past 5 years, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) delivered a total return of +95. 4%, compared to +71. 0% for The Buckle, Inc. (BKE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKE returned +237. 6% versus ANF's +229. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BKE or ANF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Buckle, Inc.
(BKE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus Abercrombie & Fitch Co. 's 1. 42β — meaning ANF is approximately 59% more volatile than BKE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Buckle, Inc. (BKE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 77% versus 82% for Abercrombie & Fitch Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BKE or ANF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) is pulling ahead at 6. 4% versus -3. 4% for The Buckle, Inc. (BKE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Abercrombie & Fitch Co. grew EPS -2. 2% year-over-year, compared to -11. 6% for The Buckle, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ANF leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BKE or ANF?
The Buckle, Inc.
(BKE) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus 9. 6% for Abercrombie & Fitch Co. — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKE leads at 19. 8% versus 13. 3% for ANF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANF leads at 58. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BKE or ANF more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 13. 4x for The Buckle, Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANF: 52. 2% to $120. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — BKE or ANF?
In this comparison, BKE (7.
2% yield) pays a dividend. ANF does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BKE or ANF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Buckle, Inc.
(BKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 7. 2% yield, +237. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKE: +237. 6%, ANF: +229. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BKE and ANF?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
BKE pays a dividend while ANF does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.