Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BKTI vs GNSS vs WRAP vs DGLY vs AXON

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BKTI
BK Technologies Corporation

Communication Equipment

TechnologyAMEX • US
Market Cap$351M
5Y Perf.+568.5%
GNSS
Genasys Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$90M
5Y Perf.-56.3%
WRAP
Wrap Technologies, Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$80M
5Y Perf.-77.7%
DGLY
Digital Ally, Inc.

Security & Protection Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
AXON
Axon Enterprise, Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$34.40B
5Y Perf.+462.0%

BKTI vs GNSS vs WRAP vs DGLY vs AXON — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BKTI logoBKTI
GNSS logoGNSS
WRAP logoWRAP
DGLY logoDGLY
AXON logoAXON
IndustryCommunication EquipmentHardware, Equipment & PartsHardware, Equipment & PartsSecurity & Protection ServicesAerospace & Defense
Market Cap$351M$90M$80M$2M$34.40B
Revenue (TTM)$86M$51M$5M$19M$2.98B
Net Income (TTM)$14M$-15M$-10M$-11M$206M
Gross Margin48.8%43.2%57.8%25.2%59.3%
Operating Margin18.6%-22.1%-288.6%-68.3%1.3%
Forward P/E26.5x55.0x
Total Debt$2M$21M$2M$9M$1.91B
Cash & Equiv.$23M$8M$3M$454K$1.20B

BKTI vs GNSS vs WRAP vs DGLY vs AXONLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BKTI
GNSS
WRAP
DGLY
AXON
StockMay 20May 26Return
BK Technologies Cor… (BKTI)100668.5+568.5%
Genasys Inc. (GNSS)10043.7-56.3%
Wrap Technologies, … (WRAP)10022.3-77.7%
Digital Ally, Inc. (DGLY)1000.0-100.0%
Axon Enterprise, In… (AXON)100562.0+462.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BKTI vs GNSS vs WRAP vs DGLY vs AXON

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BKTI leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Genasys Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. WRAP also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BKTI
BK Technologies Corporation
The Defensive Pick

BKTI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.24, Low D/E 3.5%, current ratio 4.21x
  • Lower P/E (26.5x vs 55.0x)
  • 15.7% margin vs WRAP's -221.2%
  • +121.5% vs DGLY's -73.9%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
GNSS
Genasys Inc.
The Income Pick

GNSS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.87
  • Rev growth 69.8%, EPS growth 44.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.0%
  • Beta 0.87, current ratio 0.72x
  • 69.8% revenue growth vs DGLY's -30.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
WRAP
Wrap Technologies, Inc.
The Income Pick

WRAP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.

  • 1.5% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: dividends
DGLY
Digital Ally, Inc.
The Industrials Pick

DGLY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: industrials exposure
AXON
Axon Enterprise, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

AXON is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 22.0% 10Y total return vs BKTI's 336.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGNSS logoGNSS69.8% revenue growth vs DGLY's -30.4%
ValueBKTI logoBKTILower P/E (26.5x vs 55.0x)
Quality / MarginsBKTI logoBKTI15.7% margin vs WRAP's -221.2%
Stability / SafetyGNSS logoGNSSBeta 0.87 vs DGLY's 3.58
DividendsWRAP logoWRAP1.5% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BKTI logoBKTI+121.5% vs DGLY's -73.9%
Efficiency (ROA)BKTI logoBKTI21.9% ROA vs WRAP's -61.0%, ROIC 50.5% vs -218.1%

BKTI vs GNSS vs WRAP vs DGLY vs AXON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BKTIBK Technologies Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

GNSSGenasys Inc.
FY 2025
Shipping and Handling
100.0%$181,000
WRAPWrap Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
67.4%$4M
Technology Service
32.6%$2M
DGLYDigital Ally, Inc.
FY 2024
Service, Other
70.7%$14M
Product
29.3%$6M
AXONAxon Enterprise, Inc.
FY 2025
Software And Sensors Segment
43.3%$1.2B
TASER X2
32.9%$914M
Axon Body
14.3%$397M
Platform Solutions
9.6%$266M

BKTI vs GNSS vs WRAP vs DGLY vs AXON — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBKTILAGGINGAXON

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BKTI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

AXON is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 638.5x WRAP's $5M. BKTI is the more profitable business, keeping 15.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WRAP's -2.2%. On growth, GNSS holds the edge at +145.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBKTI logoBKTIBK Technologies C…GNSS logoGNSSGenasys Inc.WRAP logoWRAPWrap Technologies…DGLY logoDGLYDigital Ally, Inc.AXON logoAXONAxon Enterprise, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$86M$51M$5M$19M$3.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$16M-$9M-$13M-$11M$97M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$14M-$15M-$10M-$11M$206M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$18M-$3M-$11M-$11M$20M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+48.8%+43.2%+57.8%+25.2%+59.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+18.6%-22.1%-2.9%-68.3%+1.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+15.7%-29.2%-2.2%-59.7%+6.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+21.4%-5.3%-2.3%-57.7%+0.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+20.0%+145.9%+62.3%+0.3%+33.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+14.0%+78.0%+50.5%-84.5%+89.8%
BKTI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BKTI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 27.3x trailing earnings, BKTI trades at a 90% valuation discount to AXON's 282.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BKTI's 20.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AXON's 1664.9x.

MetricBKTI logoBKTIBK Technologies C…GNSS logoGNSSGenasys Inc.WRAP logoWRAPWrap Technologies…DGLY logoDGLYDigital Ally, Inc.AXON logoAXONAxon Enterprise, …
Market CapShares × price$351M$90M$80M$2M$34.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$329M$104M$79M$11M$35.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS27.30x-5.00x-6.55x-0.23x282.71x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.26.46x54.97x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.24x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple20.61x1664.88x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.07x2.22x15.36x0.12x12.37x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share8.27x41.58x6.32x13.16x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.06x458.11x
BKTI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BKTI leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

BKTI delivers a 35.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $-8 for GNSS. BKTI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GNSS's 9.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BKTI scores 7/9 vs DGLY's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBKTI logoBKTIBK Technologies C…GNSS logoGNSSGenasys Inc.WRAP logoWRAPWrap Technologies…DGLY logoDGLYDigital Ally, Inc.AXON logoAXONAxon Enterprise, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+35.0%-8.2%-103.5%-136.3%+6.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+21.9%-22.0%-61.0%-42.8%+3.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+50.5%-56.7%-2.2%-114.7%-1.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+35.7%-68.2%-167.8%-135.2%-1.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–973336
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x9.85x0.21x0.59x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$21M$13M-$1M$8M$709M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$23M$8M$3M$454,314$1.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$21M$2M$9M$1.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense60.33x-31.66x-3.40x1.18x
BKTI leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BKTI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BKTI five years ago would be worth $41,093 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for DGLY. Over the past 12 months, BKTI leads with a +121.5% total return vs DGLY's -73.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BKTI at 91.4% vs DGLY's -94.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBKTI logoBKTIBK Technologies C…GNSS logoGNSSGenasys Inc.WRAP logoWRAPWrap Technologies…DGLY logoDGLYDigital Ally, Inc.AXON logoAXONAxon Enterprise, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+24.9%-8.3%-44.2%+93.9%-24.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+121.5%+2.6%0.0%-73.9%-29.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+600.9%-31.3%+16.1%-100.0%+92.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+310.9%-66.7%-76.1%-100.0%+216.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+336.1%+14.9%-71.2%-100.0%+2200.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+91.4%-11.8%+5.1%-94.2%+24.4%
BKTI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BKTI and GNSS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

GNSS is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DGLY's 3.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BKTI currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs DGLY's 8.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBKTI logoBKTIBK Technologies C…GNSS logoGNSSGenasys Inc.WRAP logoWRAPWrap Technologies…DGLY logoDGLYDigital Ally, Inc.AXON logoAXONAxon Enterprise, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.24x0.87x1.94x3.58x1.19x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$98.42$2.70$3.23$15.61$885.92
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$36.17$1.40$1.20$0.60$339.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.4%+74.1%+44.6%+8.2%+48.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.459.947.242.640.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded59K95K321K161K1.0M
Evenly matched — BKTI and GNSS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

WRAP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: BKTI as "Buy", AXON as "Buy". WRAP is the only dividend payer here at 1.47% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricBKTI logoBKTIBK Technologies C…GNSS logoGNSSGenasys Inc.WRAP logoWRAPWrap Technologies…DGLY logoDGLYDigital Ally, Inc.AXON logoAXONAxon Enterprise, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$726.71
# AnalystsCovering analysts121
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1131
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.02
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
WRAP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

BKTI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WRAP leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallBK Technologies Corporation (BKTI)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BKTI vs GNSS vs WRAP vs DGLY vs AXON: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BKTI or GNSS or WRAP or DGLY or AXON a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Genasys Inc.

(GNSS) is the stronger pick with 69. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 4% for Digital Ally, Inc. (DGLY). BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) offers the better valuation at 27. 3x trailing P/E (26. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BKTI or GNSS or WRAP or DGLY or AXON?

On trailing P/E, BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) is the cheapest at 27.

3x versus Axon Enterprise, Inc. at 282. 7x. On forward P/E, BK Technologies Corporation is actually cheaper at 26. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BKTI or GNSS or WRAP or DGLY or AXON?

Over the past 5 years, BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) delivered a total return of +310.

9%, compared to -100. 0% for Digital Ally, Inc. (DGLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AXON returned +22. 0% versus DGLY's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BKTI or GNSS or WRAP or DGLY or AXON?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Genasys Inc.

(GNSS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Digital Ally, Inc. 's 3. 58β — meaning DGLY is approximately 312% more volatile than GNSS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 10% for Genasys Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BKTI or GNSS or WRAP or DGLY or AXON?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genasys Inc.

(GNSS) is pulling ahead at 69. 8% versus -30. 4% for Digital Ally, Inc. (DGLY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BK Technologies Corporation grew EPS 52. 9% year-over-year, compared to -68. 5% for Axon Enterprise, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AXON leads at 32. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BKTI or GNSS or WRAP or DGLY or AXON?

BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) is the more profitable company, earning 15.

7% net margin versus -198. 6% for Wrap Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKTI leads at 18. 6% versus -259. 2% for WRAP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AXON leads at 59. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BKTI or GNSS or WRAP or DGLY or AXON more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) trades at 26.

5x forward P/E versus 55. 0x for Axon Enterprise, Inc. — 28. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BKTI or GNSS or WRAP or DGLY or AXON?

In this comparison, WRAP (1.

5% yield) pays a dividend. BKTI, GNSS, DGLY, AXON do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BKTI or GNSS or WRAP or DGLY or AXON better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Genasys Inc.

(GNSS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87)). Digital Ally, Inc. (DGLY) carries a higher beta of 3. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GNSS: +14. 9%, DGLY: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BKTI and GNSS and WRAP and DGLY and AXON?

These companies operate in different sectors (BKTI (Technology) and GNSS (Technology) and WRAP (Technology) and DGLY (Industrials) and AXON (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BKTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GNSS is a small-cap high-growth stock; WRAP is a small-cap high-growth stock; DGLY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AXON is a mid-cap high-growth stock. WRAP pays a dividend while BKTI, GNSS, DGLY, AXON do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BKTI

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GNSS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 72%
  • Gross Margin > 25%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WRAP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 31%
  • Gross Margin > 34%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DGLY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AXON

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BKTI and GNSS and WRAP and DGLY and AXON on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BKTI: 20.0% · GNSS: 145.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.