Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BKTI vs MNDO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
BKTI vs MNDO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $350M | $21M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $86M | $19M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $3M |
| Gross Margin | 48.8% | 51.0% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | 10.7% |
| Forward P/E | 26.5x | 7.8x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $929K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23M | $8M |
BKTI vs MNDO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BK Technologies Cor… (BKTI) | 100 | 668.5 | +568.5% |
| MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO) | 100 | 53.7 | -46.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BKTI vs MNDO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BKTI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.24
- Rev growth 12.5%, EPS growth 52.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.1%
- 328.1% 10Y total return vs MNDO's 66.7%
MNDO is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.07, yield 21.6%, current ratio 3.83x
- Lower P/E (7.8x vs 26.5x)
- Beta 0.07 vs BKTI's 1.24
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.5% revenue growth vs MNDO's -9.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.8x vs 26.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.7% margin vs MNDO's 13.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs BKTI's 1.24 | |
| Dividends | 21.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +112.8% vs MNDO's -38.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.9% ROA vs MNDO's 8.6%, ROIC 50.5% vs 8.6% |
BKTI vs MNDO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BKTI vs MNDO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKTI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKTI is the larger business by revenue, generating $86M annually — 4.4x MNDO's $19M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.7% (BKTI) to 13.4% (MNDO). On growth, BKTI holds the edge at +20.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $86M | $19M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $16M | $2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $3M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $18M | $4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.8% | +51.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.6% | +10.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +13.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.0% | -6.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.0% | -23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
MNDO leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.8x trailing earnings, MNDO trades at a 71% valuation discount to BKTI's 27.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNDO's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BKTI's 20.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $350M | $21M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $328M | $13M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.21x | 7.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.46x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.24x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.54x | 5.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.06x | 1.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.25x | 0.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.99x | 5.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BKTI leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BKTI delivers a 35.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $12 for MNDO. BKTI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MNDO's 0.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BKTI scores 7/9 vs MNDO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +35.0% | +11.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +21.9% | +8.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +50.5% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +35.7% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$21M | -$7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $8M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $929,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 60.33x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BKTI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BKTI five years ago would be worth $42,527 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,655 for MNDO. Over the past 12 months, BKTI leads with a +112.8% total return vs MNDO's -38.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BKTI at 91.2% vs MNDO's -8.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.5% | -13.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +112.8% | -38.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +598.6% | -24.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +325.3% | -33.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +328.1% | +66.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +91.2% | -8.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BKTI and MNDO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNDO is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BKTI's 1.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BKTI currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs MNDO's 60.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 0.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $98.42 | $1.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.17 | $0.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.1% | +60.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.4 | 35.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 60K | 36K |
Analyst Outlook
BKTI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
MNDO is the only dividend payer here at 21.61% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +21.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.22 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.6% |
BKTI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MNDO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BKTI vs MNDO: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BKTI or MNDO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) is the stronger pick with 12.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 3% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO). MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BKTI or MNDO?
On trailing P/E, MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the cheapest at 7. 8x versus BK Technologies Corporation at 27. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BKTI or MNDO?
Over the past 5 years, BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) delivered a total return of +325.
3%, compared to -33. 4% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKTI returned +336. 1% versus MNDO's +66. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BKTI or MNDO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 07β versus BK Technologies Corporation's 1. 24β — meaning BKTI is approximately 1696% more volatile than MNDO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 4% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BKTI or MNDO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) is pulling ahead at 12.
5% versus -9. 3% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BK Technologies Corporation grew EPS 52. 9% year-over-year, compared to -43. 5% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd. Over a 3-year CAGR, BKTI leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BKTI or MNDO?
BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
7% net margin versus 13. 4% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd — meaning it keeps 15. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKTI leads at 18. 6% versus 10. 7% for MNDO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNDO leads at 51. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — BKTI or MNDO?
In this comparison, MNDO (21.
6% yield) pays a dividend. BKTI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is BKTI or MNDO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 07), 21. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNDO: +66. 7%, BKTI: +336. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BKTI and MNDO?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BKTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNDO is a small-cap deep-value stock. MNDO pays a dividend while BKTI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.