Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BKTI vs TAIT vs DAKT vs MNDO vs LYTS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Technology Distributors
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Software - Application
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
BKTI vs TAIT vs DAKT vs MNDO vs LYTS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Technology Distributors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Software - Application | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $351M | $8M | $975M | $21M | $760M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $86M | $4M | $803M | $19M | $592M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $-972K | $28M | $3M | $26M |
| Gross Margin | 48.8% | 58.6% | 26.6% | 51.0% | 25.3% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | -50.6% | 5.6% | 10.7% | 6.5% |
| Forward P/E | 26.4x | 9.2x | 22.1x | 7.8x | 22.5x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $0.00 | $17M | $929K | $67M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23M | $4M | $128M | $8M | $3M |
BKTI vs TAIT vs DAKT vs MNDO vs LYTS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BK Technologies Cor… (BKTI) | 100 | 668.2 | +568.2% |
| Taitron Components … (TAIT) | 100 | 62.7 | -37.3% |
| Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) | 100 | 484.2 | +384.2% |
| MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO) | 100 | 52.7 | -47.3% |
| LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) | 100 | 400.0 | +300.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BKTI vs TAIT vs DAKT vs MNDO vs LYTS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BKTI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.5%, EPS growth 52.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.1%
- 336.1% 10Y total return vs DAKT's 156.0%
- PEG 0.23 vs LYTS's 1.32
- 15.7% margin vs TAIT's -27.4%
TAIT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, DAKT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MNDO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 21.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 4.0%, current ratio 3.83x
- Beta 0.07, yield 21.6%, current ratio 3.83x
- Lower P/E (7.8x vs 22.5x)
LYTS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 22.1% revenue growth vs TAIT's -32.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.1% revenue growth vs TAIT's -32.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.8x vs 22.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.7% margin vs TAIT's -27.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs DAKT's 1.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 21.6% yield, vs LYTS's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +121.5% vs MNDO's -34.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.9% ROA vs TAIT's -5.7%, ROIC 50.5% vs -0.7% |
BKTI vs TAIT vs DAKT vs MNDO vs LYTS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BKTI vs TAIT vs DAKT vs MNDO vs LYTS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BKTI leads in 3 of 6 categories
MNDO leads 1 • TAIT leads 0 • DAKT leads 0 • LYTS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKTI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAKT is the larger business by revenue, generating $803M annually — 226.4x TAIT's $4M. BKTI is the more profitable business, keeping 15.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TAIT's -27.4%. On growth, DAKT holds the edge at +21.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $86M | $4M | $803M | $19M | $592M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $16M | -$2M | $65M | $2M | $51M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | -$972,000 | $28M | $3M | $26M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $18M | $696,000 | $62M | $4M | $38M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.8% | +58.6% | +26.6% | +51.0% | +25.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.6% | -50.6% | +5.6% | +10.7% | +6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | -27.4% | +3.4% | +13.4% | +4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +19.6% | +7.7% | +20.9% | +6.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.0% | -55.4% | +21.6% | -6.0% | -0.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.0% | -124.6% | +117.0% | -23.4% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
MNDO leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.8x trailing earnings, MNDO trades at a 75% valuation discount to LYTS's 30.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BKTI offers better value at 0.24x vs LYTS's 1.82x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $351M | $8M | $975M | $21M | $760M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $329M | $4M | $865M | $13M | $823M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.30x | 9.18x | -95.29x | 7.77x | 30.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.45x | — | 22.08x | — | 22.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.24x | 0.82x | — | — | 1.82x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.61x | 57.90x | 16.42x | 5.68x | 17.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.07x | 1.98x | 1.29x | 1.06x | 1.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.27x | 0.50x | 3.50x | 0.90x | 3.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.06x | — | 12.47x | 5.20x | 21.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BKTI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BKTI delivers a 35.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $-6 for TAIT. BKTI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LYTS's 0.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BKTI scores 7/9 vs TAIT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +35.0% | -6.5% | +9.6% | +11.9% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +21.9% | -5.7% | +5.1% | +8.6% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +50.5% | -0.7% | +13.2% | +8.6% | +9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +35.7% | -0.6% | +9.9% | +7.8% | +12.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | — | 0.06x | 0.04x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$21M | -$4M | -$111M | -$7M | $63M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $4M | $128M | $8M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $0 | $17M | $929,000 | $67M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 60.33x | — | 37.31x | — | 13.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BKTI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BKTI five years ago would be worth $41,093 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,735 for TAIT. Over the past 12 months, BKTI leads with a +121.5% total return vs MNDO's -34.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BKTI at 91.4% vs TAIT's -16.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.9% | +32.9% | +0.9% | -13.7% | +32.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +121.5% | -19.9% | +46.7% | -34.8% | +58.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +600.9% | -42.4% | +293.1% | -24.2% | +100.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +310.9% | -42.7% | +208.3% | -35.0% | +223.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +336.1% | +207.3% | +156.0% | +66.7% | +108.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +91.4% | -16.8% | +57.8% | -8.8% | +26.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MNDO and LYTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNDO is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DAKT's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYTS currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs TAIT's 30.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 0.81x | 1.49x | 0.05x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $98.42 | $5.10 | $28.27 | $1.64 | $24.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.17 | $0.95 | $13.05 | $0.98 | $15.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.4% | +30.6% | +70.8% | +61.6% | +98.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.4 | 47.5 | 52.2 | 27.4 | 70.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 59K | 7K | 449K | 37K | 378K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MNDO and LYTS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BKTI as "Buy", DAKT as "Buy", LYTS as "Buy". For income investors, MNDO offers the higher dividend yield at 21.61% vs LYTS's 0.79%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | — | 4 | — | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +14.7% | — | +21.6% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.23 | — | $0.22 | $0.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +3.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% |
BKTI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MNDO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BKTI vs TAIT vs DAKT vs MNDO vs LYTS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BKTI or TAIT or DAKT or MNDO or LYTS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is the stronger pick with 22. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -32. 2% for Taitron Components Incorporated (TAIT). MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BKTI or TAIT or DAKT or MNDO or LYTS?
On trailing P/E, MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the cheapest at 7. 8x versus LSI Industries Inc. at 30. 9x. On forward P/E, Daktronics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: BK Technologies Corporation wins at 0. 23x versus LSI Industries Inc. 's 1. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BKTI or TAIT or DAKT or MNDO or LYTS?
Over the past 5 years, BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) delivered a total return of +310.
9%, compared to -42. 7% for Taitron Components Incorporated (TAIT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKTI returned +335. 9% versus MNDO's +65. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BKTI or TAIT or DAKT or MNDO or LYTS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus Daktronics, Inc. 's 1. 49β — meaning DAKT is approximately 2795% more volatile than MNDO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 29% for LSI Industries Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BKTI or TAIT or DAKT or MNDO or LYTS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is pulling ahead at 22. 1% versus -32. 2% for Taitron Components Incorporated (TAIT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BK Technologies Corporation grew EPS 52. 9% year-over-year, compared to -128. 4% for Daktronics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BKTI leads at 19. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BKTI or TAIT or DAKT or MNDO or LYTS?
Taitron Components Incorporated (TAIT) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
8% net margin versus -1. 3% for Daktronics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKTI leads at 18. 6% versus -2. 5% for TAIT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TAIT leads at 51. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BKTI or TAIT or DAKT or MNDO or LYTS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, BK Technologies Corporation (BKTI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 23x versus LSI Industries Inc. 's 1. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) trades at 22. 1x forward P/E versus 26. 4x for BK Technologies Corporation — 4. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — BKTI or TAIT or DAKT or MNDO or LYTS?
In this comparison, MNDO (21.
6% yield), TAIT (14. 7% yield), LYTS (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. BKTI, DAKT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BKTI or TAIT or DAKT or MNDO or LYTS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05), 21. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNDO: +65. 7%, DAKT: +162. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BKTI and TAIT and DAKT and MNDO and LYTS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BKTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TAIT is a small-cap deep-value stock; DAKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNDO is a small-cap deep-value stock; LYTS is a small-cap high-growth stock. TAIT, MNDO, LYTS pay a dividend while BKTI, DAKT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.