Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BLBX vs INSG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
BLBX vs INSG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $40M | $306M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $169M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $13M |
| Gross Margin | 48.0% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | -165.7% | 0.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 56.6x |
| Total Debt | $229K | $48M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $39K | $25M |
BLBX vs INSG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blackboxstocks Inc. (BLBX) | 100 | 35.0 | -65.0% |
| Inseego Corp. (INSG) | 100 | 10.5 | -89.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BLBX vs INSG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BLBX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 2.09
- Rev growth -5.3%, EPS growth -13.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -21.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.09, Low D/E 4.0%, current ratio 0.02x
INSG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 27.5% 10Y total return vs BLBX's -92.4%
- 7.7% margin vs BLBX's -182.1%
- 15.0% ROA vs BLBX's -51.4%, ROIC 25.4% vs -52.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -5.3% revenue growth vs INSG's -13.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.7% margin vs BLBX's -182.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.09 vs INSG's 2.39 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +197.4% vs INSG's +130.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.0% ROA vs BLBX's -51.4%, ROIC 25.4% vs -52.4% |
BLBX vs INSG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BLBX vs INSG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INSG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INSG is the larger business by revenue, generating $169M annually — 69.5x BLBX's $2M. INSG is the more profitable business, keeping 7.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLBX's -182.1%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $169M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $12M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.0% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -165.7% | +0.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -182.1% | +7.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -169.3% | +6.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.4% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -48.1% | +5.1% |
Valuation Metrics
INSG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $40M | $306M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $40M | $330M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.93x | -104.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 56.63x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 25.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 16.45x | 1.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.23x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 46.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INSG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INSG scores 6/9 vs BLBX's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -78.2% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -51.4% | +15.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -52.4% | +25.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -70.9% | +11.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $189,627 | $24M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39,158 | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $228,785 | $48M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.98x | 3.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BLBX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BLBX five years ago would be worth $9,280 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,269 for INSG. Over the past 12 months, BLBX leads with a +197.4% total return vs INSG's +130.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BLBX at 45.9% vs INSG's 17.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.0% | +86.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +197.4% | +130.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +210.4% | +60.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.2% | -77.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.4% | +27.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +45.9% | +17.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BLBX and INSG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BLBX is the less volatile stock with a 2.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INSG's 2.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INSG currently trades 86.6% from its 52-week high vs BLBX's 34.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.09x | 2.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.64 | $21.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.82 | $6.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.8% | +86.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.9 | 68.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 850K | 164K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
INSG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BLBX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
BLBX vs INSG: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BLBX or INSG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Blackboxstocks Inc.
(BLBX) is the stronger pick with -5. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 1% for Inseego Corp. (INSG). Analysts rate Inseego Corp. (INSG) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BLBX or INSG?
Over the past 5 years, Blackboxstocks Inc.
(BLBX) delivered a total return of -7. 2%, compared to -77. 3% for Inseego Corp. (INSG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSG returned +27. 5% versus BLBX's -92. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BLBX or INSG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Blackboxstocks Inc.
(BLBX) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 09β versus Inseego Corp. 's 2. 39β — meaning INSG is approximately 14% more volatile than BLBX relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — BLBX or INSG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Blackboxstocks Inc.
(BLBX) is pulling ahead at -5. 3% versus -13. 1% for Inseego Corp. (INSG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blackboxstocks Inc. grew EPS -13. 6% year-over-year, compared to -280. 0% for Inseego Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INSG leads at -12. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BLBX or INSG?
Inseego Corp.
(INSG) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 5% net margin versus -182. 1% for Blackboxstocks Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSG leads at 2. 8% versus -165. 7% for BLBX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BLBX leads at 48. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BLBX or INSG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is BLBX or INSG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Inseego Corp.
(INSG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Blackboxstocks Inc. (BLBX) carries a higher beta of 2. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSG: +27. 5%, BLBX: -92. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BLBX and INSG?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.