Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BLD vs IBP vs BLDR vs AWI vs TREX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Residential Construction
Construction
Construction
Construction
BLD vs IBP vs BLDR vs AWI vs TREX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Residential Construction | Construction | Construction | Construction |
| Market Cap | $12.05B | $5.84B | $8.79B | $7.05B | $4.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.62B | $2.95B | $14.82B | $1.65B | $1.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $503M | $255M | $292M | $306M | $191M |
| Gross Margin | 28.8% | 33.9% | 29.9% | 40.3% | 39.2% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | 12.7% | 4.2% | 27.5% | 22.1% |
| Forward P/E | 23.5x | 19.5x | 14.1x | 19.9x | 24.0x |
| Total Debt | $3.15B | $1.05B | $5.65B | $532M | $229M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $185M | $322M | $182M | $113M | $4M |
BLD vs IBP vs BLDR vs AWI vs TREX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TopBuild Corp. (BLD) | 100 | 373.2 | +273.2% |
| Installed Building … (IBP) | 100 | 337.3 | +237.3% |
| Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR) | 100 | 381.9 | +281.9% |
| Armstrong World Ind… (AWI) | 100 | 219.0 | +119.0% |
| Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) | 100 | 65.2 | -34.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BLD vs IBP vs BLDR vs AWI vs TREX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BLD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 12.2% 10Y total return vs IBP's 6.5%
- +50.2% vs TREX's -30.8%
IBP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.19, yield 1.5%
- PEG 0.80 vs TREX's 7.16
- Beta 1.19, yield 1.5%, current ratio 3.03x
- 1.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs AWI's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
BLDR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (14.1x vs 24.0x), PEG 1.78 vs 7.16
AWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 12.1%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 59.0%, current ratio 1.46x
- 12.1% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4%
- 18.6% margin vs BLDR's 2.0%
Among these 5 stocks, TREX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.1% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 24.0x), PEG 1.78 vs 7.16 | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.6% margin vs BLDR's 2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs BLDR's 1.65, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs AWI's 0.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +50.2% vs TREX's -30.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.0% ROA vs BLDR's 2.6%, ROIC 24.9% vs 6.4% |
BLD vs IBP vs BLDR vs AWI vs TREX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BLD vs IBP vs BLDR vs AWI vs TREX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AWI leads in 3 of 6 categories
BLDR leads 1 • BLD leads 1 • IBP leads 0 • TREX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AWI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLDR is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.8B annually — 12.6x TREX's $1.2B. AWI is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLDR's 2.0%. On growth, BLD holds the edge at +17.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.6B | $2.9B | $14.8B | $1.6B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $981M | $656M | $1.2B | $603M | $309M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $503M | $255M | $292M | $306M | $191M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $704M | $63M | $862M | $247M | $263M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.8% | +33.9% | +29.9% | +40.3% | +39.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.1% | +12.7% | +4.2% | +27.5% | +22.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +8.6% | +2.0% | +18.6% | +16.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.5% | +2.1% | +5.8% | +15.0% | +22.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.2% | -3.5% | -10.1% | +7.1% | +1.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.8% | -21.3% | -151.2% | -1.9% | +3.6% |
Valuation Metrics
BLDR leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.4x trailing earnings, BLDR trades at a 13% valuation discount to BLD's 23.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBP offers better value at 0.92x vs TREX's 6.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.0B | $5.8B | $8.8B | $7.0B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15.0B | $6.6B | $14.3B | $7.5B | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.43x | 22.33x | 20.43x | 23.32x | 22.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 23.52x | 19.50x | 14.07x | 19.87x | 23.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.19x | 0.92x | 2.59x | — | 6.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.62x | 13.41x | 10.35x | 17.23x | 13.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.23x | 1.97x | 0.58x | 4.35x | 3.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.20x | 8.26x | 2.04x | 7.99x | 4.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.29x | 19.41x | 10.30x | 28.63x | 30.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AWI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBP delivers a 37.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $7 for BLDR. TREX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IBP's 1.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AWI scores 9/9 vs BLD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.1% | +37.5% | +6.9% | +34.8% | +18.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.1% | +12.2% | +2.6% | +16.0% | +12.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.7% | +20.7% | +6.4% | +24.9% | +16.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.1% | +22.6% | +8.5% | +26.5% | +23.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.36x | 1.48x | 1.30x | 0.59x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.0B | $731M | $5.5B | $419M | $225M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $185M | $322M | $182M | $113M | $4M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.2B | $1.1B | $5.6B | $532M | $229M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.47x | 9.47x | 2.19x | 13.31x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BLD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BLD five years ago would be worth $19,116 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,599 for TREX. Over the past 12 months, BLD leads with a +50.2% total return vs TREX's -30.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AWI at 36.0% vs TREX's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.8% | -18.1% | -24.0% | -16.0% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +50.2% | +34.0% | -25.0% | +11.5% | -30.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.7% | +98.3% | -30.1% | +151.8% | -30.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +91.2% | +80.6% | +51.8% | +63.0% | -64.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1219.2% | +650.1% | +614.8% | +330.4% | +239.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.9% | +25.6% | -11.2% | +36.0% | -11.4% |
Risk & Volatility
AWI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLDR's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AWI currently trades 80.1% from its 52-week high vs BLDR's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.47x | 1.19x | 1.65x | 0.82x | 1.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $559.47 | $349.00 | $151.03 | $206.08 | $68.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $273.87 | $150.83 | $73.40 | $148.25 | $29.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.5% | +62.1% | +52.6% | +80.1% | +56.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.7 | 55.0 | 42.8 | 41.3 | 51.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 629K | 344K | 2.4M | 494K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IBP and AWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BLD as "Buy", IBP as "Hold", BLDR as "Buy", AWI as "Buy", TREX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 38.3% upside for BLDR (target: $110) vs 13.6% for TREX (target: $45). For income investors, IBP offers the higher dividend yield at 1.49% vs AWI's 0.77%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $537.80 | $293.00 | $109.92 | $197.50 | $44.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 27 | 43 | 26 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.5% | — | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.24 | — | $1.27 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.6% | +3.0% | +4.7% | +1.8% | +1.3% |
AWI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BLDR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BLD vs IBP vs BLDR vs AWI vs TREX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BLD or IBP or BLDR or AWI or TREX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the stronger pick with 12. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) offers the better valuation at 20. 4x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TopBuild Corp. (BLD) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BLD or IBP or BLDR or AWI or TREX?
On trailing P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc.
(BLDR) is the cheapest at 20. 4x versus TopBuild Corp. at 23. 4x. On forward P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Installed Building Products, Inc. wins at 0. 80x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BLD or IBP or BLDR or AWI or TREX?
Over the past 5 years, TopBuild Corp.
(BLD) delivered a total return of +91. 2%, compared to -64. 0% for Trex Company, Inc. (TREX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLD returned +1219% versus TREX's +239. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BLD or IBP or BLDR or AWI or TREX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning BLDR is approximately 102% more volatile than AWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 148% for Installed Building Products, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BLD or IBP or BLDR or AWI or TREX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is pulling ahead at 12. 1% versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Armstrong World Industries, Inc. grew EPS 17. 6% year-over-year, compared to -57. 1% for Builders FirstSource, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AWI leads at 9. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BLD or IBP or BLDR or AWI or TREX?
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 0% net margin versus 2. 9% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWI leads at 26. 6% versus 5. 2% for BLDR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AWI leads at 40. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BLD or IBP or BLDR or AWI or TREX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 80x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 24. 0x for Trex Company, Inc. — 9. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLDR: 38. 3% to $109. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — BLD or IBP or BLDR or AWI or TREX?
In this comparison, IBP (1.
5% yield), AWI (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. BLD, BLDR, TREX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BLD or IBP or BLDR or AWI or TREX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 0. 8% yield, +330. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWI: +330. 4%, TREX: +239. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BLD and IBP and BLDR and AWI and TREX?
These companies operate in different sectors (BLD (Industrials) and IBP (Consumer Cyclical) and BLDR (Industrials) and AWI (Industrials) and TREX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
IBP, AWI pay a dividend while BLD, BLDR, TREX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.