Construction
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BLDR vs SPIR vs ASTS vs IBP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Communication Equipment
Residential Construction
BLDR vs SPIR vs ASTS vs IBP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Specialty Business Services | Communication Equipment | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $8.25B | $541.04B | $18.69B | $7.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14.82B | $72M | $71M | $2.97B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $292M | $-25.02B | $-342M | $265M |
| Gross Margin | 29.9% | 40.8% | 53.4% | 34.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | -121.4% | -405.7% | 13.0% |
| Forward P/E | 13.2x | 10.2x | — | 25.4x |
| Total Debt | $5.65B | $8.76B | $32M | $1.05B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $182M | $24.81B | $2.34B | $322M |
BLDR vs SPIR vs ASTS vs IBP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR) | 100 | 199.3 | +99.3% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 20.9 | -79.1% |
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 630.8 | +530.8% |
| Installed Building … (IBP) | 100 | 285.7 | +185.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BLDR vs SPIR vs ASTS vs IBP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BLDR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SPIR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
ASTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.82, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 16.35x
- 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
- +158.1% vs BLDR's -33.3%
IBP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.19, yield 1.1%
- 9.0% 10Y total return vs ASTS's 5.5%
- PEG 1.04 vs BLDR's 1.67
- Beta 1.19, yield 1.1%, current ratio 3.03x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.9% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.19 vs SPIR's 2.93 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +158.1% vs BLDR's -33.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.0% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 20.7% vs -0.1% |
BLDR vs SPIR vs ASTS vs IBP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BLDR vs SPIR vs ASTS vs IBP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBP leads in 3 of 6 categories
BLDR leads 1 • ASTS leads 1 • SPIR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ASTS and IBP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLDR is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.8B annually — 209.0x ASTS's $71M. IBP is the more profitable business, keeping 8.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14.8B | $72M | $71M | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | -$74M | -$237M | $704M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $292M | -$25.0B | -$342M | $265M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $862M | -$16.2B | -$1.1B | $49M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.9% | +40.8% | +53.4% | +34.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | -121.4% | -4.1% | +13.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | -349.6% | -4.8% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | -227.0% | -16.0% | +1.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.1% | -26.9% | +27.3% | -0.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -151.2% | +59.5% | -55.6% | +18.4% |
Valuation Metrics
BLDR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.2x trailing earnings, SPIR trades at a 65% valuation discount to IBP's 29.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBP offers better value at 1.20x vs BLDR's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.2B | $541.0B | $18.7B | $7.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.7B | $525.0B | $16.4B | $8.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.17x | 10.22x | -47.66x | 29.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.20x | — | — | 25.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.43x | — | — | 1.20x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.95x | — | — | 17.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.54x | 7561.39x | 263.55x | 2.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.92x | 4.66x | 5.56x | 10.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.66x | — | — | 25.29x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBP delivers a 39.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IBP's 1.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBP scores 8/9 vs ASTS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.9% | -88.4% | -21.1% | +39.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | -47.3% | -12.6% | +13.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.4% | -0.1% | -47.1% | +20.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.5% | -0.1% | -10.0% | +22.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.30x | 0.08x | 0.01x | 1.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.5B | -$16.1B | -$2.3B | $731M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $182M | $24.8B | $2.3B | $322M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.6B | $8.8B | $32M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.19x | 9.20x | -21.20x | 12.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $83,164 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,078 for SPIR. Over the past 12 months, ASTS leads with a +158.1% total return vs BLDR's -33.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 132.8% vs BLDR's -12.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.7% | +110.8% | -23.5% | +6.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -33.3% | +77.8% | +158.1% | +67.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.0% | +231.1% | +1162.3% | +149.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.0% | -79.2% | +731.6% | +113.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +560.4% | -78.3% | +553.7% | +898.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.5% | +49.0% | +132.8% | +35.5% |
Risk & Volatility
IBP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBP is the less volatile stock with a 1.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IBP currently trades 80.9% from its 52-week high vs ASTS's 49.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.65x | 2.93x | 2.82x | 1.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $151.03 | $23.59 | $129.89 | $349.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $73.40 | $6.60 | $22.47 | $150.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.4% | +69.8% | +49.2% | +80.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.7 | 52.8 | 37.2 | 42.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 1.5M | 14.5M | 318K |
Analyst Outlook
IBP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BLDR as "Buy", SPIR as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy", IBP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 62.3% upside for ASTS (target: $104) vs 3.8% for IBP (target: $293). IBP is the only dividend payer here at 1.15% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $109.92 | $17.25 | $103.65 | $293.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 43 | 12 | 7 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $3.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.3% |
IBP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). BLDR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
BLDR vs SPIR vs ASTS vs IBP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BLDR or SPIR or ASTS or IBP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 10. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) a "Buy" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BLDR or SPIR or ASTS or IBP?
On trailing P/E, Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the cheapest at 10. 2x versus Installed Building Products, Inc. at 29. 1x. On forward P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Installed Building Products, Inc. wins at 1. 04x versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 67x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BLDR or SPIR or ASTS or IBP?
Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) delivered a total return of +731. 6%, compared to -79. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBP returned +898. 7% versus SPIR's -78. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BLDR or SPIR or ASTS or IBP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 19β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 146% more volatile than IBP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 148% for Installed Building Products, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BLDR or SPIR or ASTS or IBP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to -57. 1% for Builders FirstSource, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTS leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BLDR or SPIR or ASTS or IBP?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -482. 2% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBP leads at 13. 0% versus -405. 7% for ASTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASTS leads at 53. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BLDR or SPIR or ASTS or IBP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 04x versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 67x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 4x for Installed Building Products, Inc. — 12. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASTS: 62. 3% to $103. 65.
08Which pays a better dividend — BLDR or SPIR or ASTS or IBP?
In this comparison, IBP (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. BLDR, SPIR, ASTS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BLDR or SPIR or ASTS or IBP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 19), 1. 1% yield, +898. 7% 10Y return). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBP: +898. 7%, SPIR: -78. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BLDR and SPIR and ASTS and IBP?
These companies operate in different sectors (BLDR (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and IBP (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BLDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; IBP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. IBP pays a dividend while BLDR, SPIR, ASTS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.