Asset Management
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BLK vs STT vs BEN vs IVZ vs AMG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
BLK vs STT vs BEN vs IVZ vs AMG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $165.65B | $41.99B | $15.86B | $11.92B | $7.95B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20.41B | $21.97B | $8.77B | $6.38B | $2.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6.10B | $2.98B | $812M | $-243M | $717M |
| Gross Margin | 49.4% | 58.5% | 80.3% | 43.2% | 86.0% |
| Operating Margin | 37.1% | 15.5% | 6.9% | -10.9% | 31.8% |
| Forward P/E | 20.1x | 12.0x | 11.2x | 10.4x | 9.0x |
| Total Debt | $14.22B | $36.79B | $13.30B | $10.12B | $2.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12.76B | $116.10B | $3.57B | $1.98B | $586M |
BLK vs STT vs BEN vs IVZ vs AMG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) | 100 | 202.0 | +102.0% |
| State Street Corpor… (STT) | 100 | 244.1 | +144.1% |
| Franklin Resources,… (BEN) | 100 | 161.8 | +61.8% |
| Invesco Ltd. (IVZ) | 100 | 336.6 | +236.6% |
| Affiliated Managers… (AMG) | 100 | 447.0 | +347.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BLK vs STT vs BEN vs IVZ vs AMG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BLK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.28, Low D/E 28.8%, current ratio 16.40x
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs BEN's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
- 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs BEN's 4.3%
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs BEN's 0.7%
STT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 186.8% 10Y total return vs BLK's 245.8%
- NIM 0.8% vs BLK's 0.2%
BEN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 1.31, yield 4.3%
IVZ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 1.67, yield 3.1%, current ratio 43.01x
- +93.1% vs BLK's +18.3%
AMG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 19.8%, EPS growth 50.3%
- PEG 0.23 vs BLK's 2.47
- 19.8% NII/revenue growth vs BEN's 3.5%
- Lower P/E (9.0x vs 11.2x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.8% NII/revenue growth vs BEN's 3.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.0x vs 11.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs BEN's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.14 vs IVZ's 1.67, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs BEN's 4.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +93.1% vs BLK's +18.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs BEN's 0.7% |
BLK vs STT vs BEN vs IVZ vs AMG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BLK vs STT vs BEN vs IVZ vs AMG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMG leads in 3 of 6 categories
STT leads 1 • BLK leads 0 • BEN leads 0 • IVZ leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMG leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STT is the larger business by revenue, generating $22.0B annually — 9.0x AMG's $2.4B. BLK is the more profitable business, keeping 31.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IVZ's -4.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20.4B | $22.0B | $8.8B | $6.4B | $2.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8.3B | $4.3B | $1.2B | $1.2B | $855M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6.1B | $3.0B | $812M | -$243M | $717M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.9B | -$6.1B | $938M | $1.9B | $978M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.4% | +58.5% | +80.3% | +43.2% | +86.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.1% | +15.5% | +6.9% | -10.9% | +31.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +31.2% | +12.2% | +6.0% | -4.4% | +29.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | -64.3% | +10.4% | +22.6% | +41.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -22.7% | +23.0% | +100.0% | +34.2% | +149.1% |
Valuation Metrics
AMG leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.1x trailing earnings, AMG trades at a 61% valuation discount to BEN's 33.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMG offers better value at 0.33x vs BLK's 3.13x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $165.7B | $42.0B | $15.9B | $11.9B | $7.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $167.1B | -$37.3B | $25.6B | $20.1B | $10.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.42x | 18.12x | 33.54x | -16.77x | 13.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.10x | 11.99x | 11.21x | 10.44x | 8.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.13x | 2.05x | — | — | 0.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.62x | -9.33x | 22.53x | 16.34x | 10.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.12x | 1.91x | 1.81x | 1.87x | 3.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.28x | 1.78x | 1.11x | 0.94x | 2.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 35.24x | — | 17.40x | 8.27x | 7.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMG delivers a 16.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-2 for IVZ. BLK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STT's 1.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMG scores 8/9 vs STT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.9% | +10.8% | +5.6% | -1.7% | +16.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.7% | +0.8% | +2.5% | -0.9% | +8.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.9% | +4.6% | +1.6% | -2.3% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | +4.6% | +2.0% | -2.6% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 1.45x | 0.94x | 0.78x | 0.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | -$79.3B | $9.7B | $8.1B | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12.8B | $116.1B | $3.6B | $2.0B | $586M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14.2B | $36.8B | $13.3B | $10.1B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.27x | 0.42x | 15.19x | -6.19x | 9.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STT five years ago would be worth $18,620 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,740 for BEN. Over the past 12 months, IVZ leads with a +93.1% total return vs BLK's +18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STT at 31.7% vs BEN's 10.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.1% | +16.6% | +29.6% | +0.4% | +3.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.3% | +66.2% | +55.5% | +93.1% | +70.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.7% | +128.4% | +35.3% | +79.8% | +109.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.5% | +86.2% | +7.4% | +8.2% | +71.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +245.8% | +186.8% | +23.5% | +22.1% | +86.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.7% | +31.7% | +10.6% | +21.6% | +28.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BEN and AMG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMG is the less volatile stock with a 1.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IVZ's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BEN currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs BLK's 87.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.28x | 1.19x | 1.31x | 1.67x | 1.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1219.94 | $156.18 | $31.44 | $29.61 | $334.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $914.84 | $90.94 | $20.08 | $14.10 | $172.54 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.5% | +95.3% | +97.1% | +90.6% | +88.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.3 | 63.9 | 78.4 | 69.4 | 61.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 790K | 2.0M | 5.1M | 5.1M | 345K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BLK and BEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BLK as "Buy", STT as "Buy", BEN as "Hold", IVZ as "Hold", AMG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.8% upside for BLK (target: $1312) vs -5.8% for BEN (target: $29). For income investors, BEN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.35% vs BLK's 1.92%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1311.78 | $160.44 | $28.75 | $29.72 | $331.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 33 | 37 | 27 | 28 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +2.3% | +4.3% | +3.1% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $20.46 | $3.42 | $1.33 | $0.83 | $0.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | +6.9% | +1.5% | +15.6% | +8.9% |
AMG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). STT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
BLK vs STT vs BEN vs IVZ vs AMG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BLK or STT or BEN or IVZ or AMG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) is the stronger pick with 19. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 5% for Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN). Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BLK or STT or BEN or IVZ or AMG?
On trailing P/E, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) is the cheapest at 13. 1x versus Franklin Resources, Inc. at 33. 5x. On forward P/E, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. wins at 0. 23x versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 2. 47x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BLK or STT or BEN or IVZ or AMG?
Over the past 5 years, State Street Corporation (STT) delivered a total return of +86.
2%, compared to +7. 4% for Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLK returned +245. 8% versus IVZ's +22. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BLK or STT or BEN or IVZ or AMG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 14β versus Invesco Ltd. 's 1. 67β — meaning IVZ is approximately 47% more volatile than AMG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 145% for State Street Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BLK or STT or BEN or IVZ or AMG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) is pulling ahead at 19. 8% versus 3. 5% for Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. grew EPS 50. 3% year-over-year, compared to -235. 6% for Invesco Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BLK or STT or BEN or IVZ or AMG?
BlackRock, Inc.
(BLK) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 2% net margin versus -4. 4% for Invesco Ltd. — meaning it keeps 31. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BLK leads at 37. 1% versus -10. 9% for IVZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMG leads at 86. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BLK or STT or BEN or IVZ or AMG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 23x versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 2. 47x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) trades at 9. 0x forward P/E versus 20. 1x for BlackRock, Inc. — 11. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLK: 22. 8% to $1311. 78.
08Which pays a better dividend — BLK or STT or BEN or IVZ or AMG?
In this comparison, BEN (4.
3% yield), IVZ (3. 1% yield), STT (2. 3% yield), BLK (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. AMG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BLK or STT or BEN or IVZ or AMG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, State Street Corporation (STT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
19), 2. 3% yield, +186. 8% 10Y return). Invesco Ltd. (IVZ) carries a higher beta of 1. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STT: +186. 8%, IVZ: +22. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BLK and STT and BEN and IVZ and AMG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BLK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; STT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BEN is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; IVZ is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; AMG is a small-cap high-growth stock. BLK, STT, BEN, IVZ pay a dividend while AMG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.