Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BLTE vs ACAD vs REPL vs BEAM vs NKTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
BLTE vs ACAD vs REPL vs BEAM vs NKTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $4.96B | $3.86B | $266M | $3.23B | $1.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.10B | $0.00 | $132M | $55M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-49M | $376M | $-315M | $-65M | $-164M |
| Gross Margin | — | 91.5% | — | -64.2% | 99.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 7.4% | — | -281.0% | -237.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 55.6x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $537K | $52M | $76M | $294M | $149M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $32M | $178M | $111M | $295M | $15M |
BLTE vs ACAD vs REPL vs BEAM vs NKTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belite Bio, Inc (BLTE) | 100 | 1462.5 | +1362.5% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 121.5 | +21.5% |
| Replimune Group, In… (REPL) | 100 | 24.3 | -75.7% |
| Beam Therapeutics I… (BEAM) | 100 | 86.1 | -13.9% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 132.2 | +32.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BLTE vs ACAD vs REPL vs BEAM vs NKTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BLTE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- beta 0.80
- 13.7% 10Y total return vs BEAM's 67.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 0.4%, current ratio 24.31x
- Beta 0.80, current ratio 24.31x
ACAD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and efficiency.
- 34.3% margin vs NKTR's -297.1%
- 26.2% ROA vs REPL's -94.4%, ROIC 10.0% vs -51.9%
Among these 5 stocks, REPL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BEAM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 120.0%, EPS growth 82.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.9%
- 120.0% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9%
NKTR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +8.2% vs REPL's -53.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 120.0% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs NKTR's -297.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs BEAM's 2.14, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs REPL's -53.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs REPL's -94.4%, ROIC 10.0% vs -51.9% |
BLTE vs ACAD vs REPL vs BEAM vs NKTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BLTE vs ACAD vs REPL vs BEAM vs NKTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACAD leads in 2 of 6 categories
NKTR leads 1 • BLTE leads 0 • REPL leads 0 • BEAM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD and REPL operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NKTR's -3.0%. On growth, ACAD holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.1B | $0 | $132M | $55M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$50M | $96M | -$323M | -$355M | -$130M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$49M | $376M | -$315M | -$65M | -$164M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $212M | -$283M | -$384M | -$209M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +91.5% | — | -64.2% | +99.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +7.4% | — | -2.8% | -2.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +34.3% | — | -49.2% | -3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +19.4% | — | -2.9% | -3.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +9.7% | — | -100.0% | -25.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -61.3% | -81.8% | +2.5% | +26.6% | -4.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BLTE and ACAD and REPL each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.0B | $3.9B | $266M | $3.2B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.9B | $3.7B | $231M | $3.2B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -132.20x | 9.85x | -1.09x | -38.85x | -8.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 55.62x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 26.91x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.61x | — | 23.14x | 30.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 32.67x | 3.15x | 0.65x | 2.51x | 15.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 36.74x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-4 for NKTR. BLTE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NKTR's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACAD scores 6/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -34.9% | +35.6% | -149.5% | -5.9% | -4.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -33.6% | +26.2% | -94.4% | -4.6% | -62.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -50.9% | +10.0% | -51.9% | -31.1% | -57.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -33.7% | +10.1% | -55.9% | -33.3% | -55.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.04x | 0.18x | 0.24x | 1.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$31M | -$126M | -$35M | -$1M | $134M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32M | $178M | $111M | $295M | $15M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $537,000 | $52M | $76M | $294M | $149M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1999.80x | — | -48.62x | 1.08x | -4.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BLTE five years ago would be worth $147,309 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $932 for REPL. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs REPL's -53.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs REPL's -43.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.1% | -13.7% | -62.5% | +16.0% | +92.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +154.4% | +52.4% | -53.4% | +93.9% | +818.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +482.1% | +4.7% | -81.5% | -5.6% | +621.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1373.1% | +7.1% | -90.7% | -55.6% | -72.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1373.1% | -22.9% | -78.0% | +67.8% | -59.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +79.9% | +1.5% | -43.0% | -1.9% | +93.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BLTE and BEAM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BLTE is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BEAM's 2.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BEAM currently trades 86.4% from its 52-week high vs REPL's 25.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 1.11x | 0.80x | 2.08x | 1.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $200.00 | $27.81 | $13.24 | $36.44 | $109.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $56.10 | $14.45 | $1.50 | $15.35 | $7.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.0% | +81.1% | +25.2% | +86.4% | +76.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.0 | 44.2 | 46.3 | 60.9 | 53.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 155K | 1.8M | 5.6M | 2.0M | 991K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BLTE as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", REPL as "Buy", BEAM as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 319.2% upside for REPL (target: $14) vs 29.7% for BEAM (target: $41).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $203.00 | $34.78 | $14.00 | $40.83 | $147.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 37 | 15 | 27 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ACAD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NKTR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
BLTE vs ACAD vs REPL vs BEAM vs NKTR: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BLTE or ACAD or REPL or BEAM or NKTR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Beam Therapeutics Inc.
(BEAM) is the stronger pick with 120. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (55. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Belite Bio, Inc (BLTE) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BLTE or ACAD or REPL or BEAM or NKTR?
Over the past 5 years, Belite Bio, Inc (BLTE) delivered a total return of +1373%, compared to -90.
7% for Replimune Group, Inc. (REPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLTE returned +1363% versus REPL's -73. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BLTE or ACAD or REPL or BEAM or NKTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Belite Bio, Inc (BLTE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
79β versus Beam Therapeutics Inc. 's 2. 08β — meaning BEAM is approximately 164% more volatile than BLTE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Belite Bio, Inc (BLTE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 166% for Nektar Therapeutics — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BLTE or ACAD or REPL or BEAM or NKTR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Beam Therapeutics Inc.
(BEAM) is pulling ahead at 120. 0% versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Beam Therapeutics Inc. grew EPS 82. 3% year-over-year, compared to -12. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics. Over a 3-year CAGR, BEAM leads at 31. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BLTE or ACAD or REPL or BEAM or NKTR?
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -297. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACAD leads at 9. 8% versus -274. 6% for BEAM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BLTE or ACAD or REPL or BEAM or NKTR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for REPL: 319.
2% to $14. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — BLTE or ACAD or REPL or BEAM or NKTR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is BLTE or ACAD or REPL or BEAM or NKTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Belite Bio, Inc (BLTE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), +1363% 10Y return). Beam Therapeutics Inc. (BEAM) carries a higher beta of 2. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BLTE: +1363%, BEAM: +72. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BLTE and ACAD and REPL and BEAM and NKTR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BLTE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; REPL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BEAM is a small-cap high-growth stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.