Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BLTE vs REPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
BLTE vs REPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $4.96B | $266M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-49M | $-315M |
| Total Debt | $537K | $76M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $32M | $111M |
BLTE vs REPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belite Bio, Inc (BLTE) | 100 | 1462.5 | +1362.5% |
| Replimune Group, In… (REPL) | 100 | 24.3 | -75.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BLTE vs REPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BLTE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.80
- 13.7% 10Y total return vs REPL's -78.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 0.4%, current ratio 24.31x
REPL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 5.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quality / Margins | 2.4% margin vs REPL's 2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs REPL's 0.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +154.4% vs REPL's -53.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -33.6% ROA vs REPL's -94.4%, ROIC -50.9% vs -51.9% |
BLTE vs REPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REPL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLTE and REPL operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$50M | -$323M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$49M | -$315M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -61.3% | +2.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BLTE and REPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.0B | $266M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.9B | $231M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -132.20x | -1.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 32.67x | 0.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BLTE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BLTE delivers a -34.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-35 in annual profit, vs $-150 for REPL. BLTE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to REPL's 0.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BLTE scores 3/9 vs REPL's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -34.9% | -149.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -33.6% | -94.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -50.9% | -51.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -33.7% | -55.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$31M | -$35M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32M | $111M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $537,000 | $76M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1999.80x | -48.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BLTE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BLTE five years ago would be worth $147,309 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $932 for REPL. Over the past 12 months, BLTE leads with a +154.4% total return vs REPL's -53.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BLTE at 79.9% vs REPL's -43.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.1% | -62.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +154.4% | -53.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +482.1% | -81.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1373.1% | -90.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1373.1% | -78.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +79.9% | -43.0% |
Risk & Volatility
BLTE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BLTE is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than REPL's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BLTE currently trades 78.0% from its 52-week high vs REPL's 25.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $200.00 | $13.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $56.10 | $1.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.0% | +25.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.0 | 46.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 155K | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BLTE as "Buy" and REPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 274.3% upside for REPL (target: $13) vs 30.1% for BLTE (target: $203).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $203.00 | $12.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BLTE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). REPL leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
BLTE vs REPL: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BLTE or REPL a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Belite Bio, Inc (BLTE) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BLTE or REPL?
Over the past 5 years, Belite Bio, Inc (BLTE) delivered a total return of +1373%, compared to -90.
7% for Replimune Group, Inc. (REPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLTE returned +1363% versus REPL's -73. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BLTE or REPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Belite Bio, Inc (BLTE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
79β versus Replimune Group, Inc. 's 0. 80β — meaning REPL is approximately 2% more volatile than BLTE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Belite Bio, Inc (BLTE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 18% for Replimune Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BLTE or REPL?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Replimune Group, Inc.
grew EPS 5. 2% year-over-year, compared to 0. 8% for Belite Bio, Inc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BLTE or REPL?
Belite Bio, Inc (BLTE) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Replimune Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BLTE leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for REPL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BLTE leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — BLTE or REPL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is BLTE or REPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Belite Bio, Inc (BLTE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), +1363% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BLTE: +1363%, REPL: -73. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between BLTE and REPL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.