Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
BMEA logo
BMEA
NTRA logo
NTRA
ILMN logo
ILMN
BEAM logo
BEAM
CRSP logo
CRSP
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BMEA vs NTRA vs ILMN vs BEAM vs CRSP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BMEA
Biomea Fusion, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$70M
5Y Perf.-93.1%
NTRA
Natera, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$30.37B
5Y Perf.+92.8%
ILMN
Illumina, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$24.45B
5Y Perf.-57.8%
BEAM
Beam Therapeutics Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.98B
5Y Perf.-64.6%
CRSP
CRISPR Therapeutics AG

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • CH
Market Cap$4.80B
5Y Perf.-62.1%

BMEA vs NTRA vs ILMN vs BEAM vs CRSP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BMEA logoBMEA
NTRA logoNTRA
ILMN logoILMN
BEAM logoBEAM
CRSP logoCRSP
IndustryBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$70M$30.37B$24.45B$2.98B$4.80B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$2.50B$4.39B$132M$4M
Net Income (TTM)$-45M$-226M$853M$-65M$-569M
Gross Margin65.2%67.1%-64.2%-53.6%
Operating Margin-13.0%20.9%-281.0%-134.1%
Forward P/E30.8x
Total Debt$2M$214M$2.55B$294M$395M
Cash & Equiv.$56M$1.08B$1.42B$295M$355M

BMEA vs NTRA vs ILMN vs BEAM vs CRSPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BMEA
NTRA
ILMN
BEAM
CRSP
StockApr 21Jun 26Return
Biomea Fusion, Inc. (BMEA)1006.9-93.1%
Natera, Inc. (NTRA)100192.8+92.8%
Illumina, Inc. (ILMN)10042.2-57.8%
Beam Therapeutics I… (BEAM)10035.4-64.6%
CRISPR Therapeutics… (CRSP)10037.9-62.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BMEA vs NTRA vs ILMN vs BEAM vs CRSP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ILMN leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Beam Therapeutics Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇ILMN emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
BMEA
Biomea Fusion, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

BMEA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.78, Low D/E 5.4%, current ratio 5.23x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
NTRA
Natera, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

NTRA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 17.3% 10Y total return vs CRSP's 253.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
ILMN
Illumina, Inc.
The Income Pick

ILMN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • beta 0.99
  • Better valuation composite
  • 19.4% margin vs CRSP's -138.6%
  • Beta 0.99 vs BEAM's 2.18
Best for: income & stability
BEAM
Beam Therapeutics Inc.
The Growth Play

BEAM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 120.0%, EPS growth 82.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.9%
  • 120.0% revenue growth vs CRSP's -90.0%
Best for: growth exposure
CRSP
CRISPR Therapeutics AG
The Defensive Pick

CRSP is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 1.89, current ratio 13.32x
Best for: defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBEAM logoBEAM120.0% revenue growth vs CRSP's -90.0%
ValueILMN logoILMNBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsILMN logoILMN19.4% margin vs CRSP's -138.6%
Stability / SafetyILMN logoILMNBeta 0.99 vs BEAM's 2.18
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ILMN logoILMN+82.7% vs BMEA's -55.2%
Efficiency (ROA)ILMN logoILMN13.4% ROA vs BMEA's -77.1%

BMEA vs NTRA vs ILMN vs BEAM vs CRSP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
BMEABiomea Fusion, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

NTRANatera, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
99.6%$2.3B
Licensing and other
0.4%$10M
ILMNIllumina, Inc.
FY 2025
Sequencing
91.8%$4.0B
Microarray
8.2%$358M
BEAMBeam Therapeutics Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CRSPCRISPR Therapeutics AG
FY 2025
Grant
100.0%$4M

BMEA vs NTRA vs ILMN vs BEAM vs CRSP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLILMNLAGGINGCRSP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ILMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

ILMN and BMEA operate at a comparable scale, with $4.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. ILMN is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRSP's -138.6%. On growth, CRSP holds the edge at +68.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBMEA logoBMEABiomea Fusion, In…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$2.5B$4.4B$132M$4M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$66M-$313M$1.1B-$355M-$531M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$45M-$226M$853M-$65M-$569M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$56M$92M$989M-$384M-$401M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+65.2%+67.1%-64.2%-53.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-13.0%+20.9%-2.8%-134.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-9.0%+19.4%-49.2%-138.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.7%+22.5%-2.9%-97.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+38.8%+4.8%-100.0%+68.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+78.8%-20.0%+6.1%+26.6%+19.0%
ILMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ILMN leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricBMEA logoBMEABiomea Fusion, In…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…
Market CapShares × price$70M$30.4B$24.5B$3.0B$4.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$15M$29.5B$25.6B$3.0B$4.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.99x-139.52x29.54x-35.84x-7.70x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.30.83x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate6.98x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple22.56x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue13.17x5.64x21.34x1368.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.07x16.93x9.22x2.32x2.33x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF278.35x26.26x
ILMN leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ILMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ILMN delivers a 32.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-197 for BMEA. BMEA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ILMN's 0.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ILMN scores 8/9 vs CRSP's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBMEA logoBMEABiomea Fusion, In…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-196.7%-15.1%+32.8%-5.9%-30.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-77.1%-10.4%+13.4%-4.6%-24.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-36.1%+16.8%-31.1%-22.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-153.8%-18.3%+17.6%-33.3%-26.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–935841
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.05x0.13x0.94x0.24x0.21x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$54M-$862M$1.1B-$1M$40M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$56M$1.1B$1.4B$295M$355M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$214M$2.6B$294M$395M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-34.29x12.09x1.08x
ILMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NTRA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NTRA five years ago would be worth $20,440 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $569 for BMEA. Over the past 12 months, ILMN leads with a +82.7% total return vs BMEA's -55.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTRA at 62.4% vs BMEA's -69.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBMEA logoBMEABiomea Fusion, In…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-12.7%-7.3%+19.8%+7.0%-7.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-55.2%+29.0%+82.7%+66.5%+20.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.1%+328.7%-20.4%-12.0%-16.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-94.3%+104.4%-63.4%-68.4%-61.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-93.1%+1731.3%+18.6%+54.8%+253.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-69.2%+62.4%-7.3%-4.2%-6.0%
NTRA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

ILMN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

ILMN is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BEAM's 2.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ILMN currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs BMEA's 38.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBMEA logoBMEABiomea Fusion, In…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.78x1.24x0.99x2.18x1.89x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.08$256.36$177.22$36.44$78.48
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.87$131.81$85.77$15.60$39.81
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+38.0%+82.7%+90.8%+79.7%+63.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10038.255.966.448.445.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.5M1.4M1.7M1.9M1.7M
ILMN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: BMEA as "Buy", NTRA as "Buy", ILMN as "Buy", BEAM as "Buy", CRSP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1626.5% upside for BMEA (target: $20) vs -5.9% for ILMN (target: $151).

MetricBMEA logoBMEABiomea Fusion, In…NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.ILMN logoILMNIllumina, Inc.BEAM logoBEAMBeam Therapeutics…CRSP logoCRSPCRISPR Therapeuti…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$20.20$261.00$151.40$48.00$71.67
# AnalystsCovering analysts1327502738
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ILMN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NTRA leads in 1 (Total Returns).

Best OverallIllumina, Inc. (ILMN)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BMEA vs NTRA vs ILMN vs BEAM vs CRSP: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BMEA or NTRA or ILMN or BEAM or CRSP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Beam Therapeutics Inc.

(BEAM) is the stronger pick with 120. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -90. 0% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP). Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) offers the better valuation at 29. 5x trailing P/E (30. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Biomea Fusion, Inc. (BMEA) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — BMEA or NTRA or ILMN or BEAM or CRSP?

Over the past 5 years, Natera, Inc.

(NTRA) delivered a total return of +104. 4%, compared to -94. 3% for Biomea Fusion, Inc. (BMEA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTRA returned +1731% versus BMEA's -93. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — BMEA or NTRA or ILMN or BEAM or CRSP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Beam Therapeutics Inc. 's 2. 18β — meaning BEAM is approximately 121% more volatile than ILMN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Biomea Fusion, Inc. (BMEA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 94% for Illumina, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — BMEA or NTRA or ILMN or BEAM or CRSP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Beam Therapeutics Inc.

(BEAM) is pulling ahead at 120. 0% versus -90. 0% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Illumina, Inc. grew EPS 170. 9% year-over-year, compared to -49. 1% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRSP leads at 100. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — BMEA or NTRA or ILMN or BEAM or CRSP?

Illumina, Inc.

(ILMN) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 6% net margin versus -165. 7% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG — meaning it keeps 19. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ILMN leads at 19. 9% versus -161. 9% for CRSP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BEAM leads at 84. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is BMEA or NTRA or ILMN or BEAM or CRSP more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BMEA: 1626.

5% to $20. 20.

07

Which pays a better dividend — BMEA or NTRA or ILMN or BEAM or CRSP?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is BMEA or NTRA or ILMN or BEAM or CRSP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Natera, Inc.

(NTRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 24), +1731% 10Y return). Beam Therapeutics Inc. (BEAM) carries a higher beta of 2. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTRA: +1731%, BEAM: +54. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between BMEA and NTRA and ILMN and BEAM and CRSP?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BMEA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTRA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ILMN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BEAM is a small-cap high-growth stock; CRSP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.