Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
BMEA vs NTRA vs ILMN vs BEAM vs CRSP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
BMEA vs NTRA vs ILMN vs BEAM vs CRSP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $70M | $30.37B | $24.45B | $2.98B | $4.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $2.50B | $4.39B | $132M | $4M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-45M | $-226M | $853M | $-65M | $-569M |
| Gross Margin | — | 65.2% | 67.1% | -64.2% | -53.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | -13.0% | 20.9% | -281.0% | -134.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 30.8x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $214M | $2.55B | $294M | $395M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $56M | $1.08B | $1.42B | $295M | $355M |
BMEA vs NTRA vs ILMN vs BEAM vs CRSP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biomea Fusion, Inc. (BMEA) | 100 | 6.9 | -93.1% |
| Natera, Inc. (NTRA) | 100 | 192.8 | +92.8% |
| Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) | 100 | 42.2 | -57.8% |
| Beam Therapeutics I… (BEAM) | 100 | 35.4 | -64.6% |
| CRISPR Therapeutics… (CRSP) | 100 | 37.9 | -62.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BMEA vs NTRA vs ILMN vs BEAM vs CRSP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BMEA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.78, Low D/E 5.4%, current ratio 5.23x
NTRA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 17.3% 10Y total return vs CRSP's 253.4%
ILMN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- beta 0.99
- Better valuation composite
- 19.4% margin vs CRSP's -138.6%
- Beta 0.99 vs BEAM's 2.18
BEAM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 120.0%, EPS growth 82.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.9%
- 120.0% revenue growth vs CRSP's -90.0%
CRSP is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.89, current ratio 13.32x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 120.0% revenue growth vs CRSP's -90.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.4% margin vs CRSP's -138.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs BEAM's 2.18 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +82.7% vs BMEA's -55.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.4% ROA vs BMEA's -77.1% |
BMEA vs NTRA vs ILMN vs BEAM vs CRSP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BMEA vs NTRA vs ILMN vs BEAM vs CRSP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ILMN leads in 4 of 6 categories
NTRA leads 1 • BMEA leads 0 • BEAM leads 0 • CRSP leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ILMN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ILMN and BMEA operate at a comparable scale, with $4.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. ILMN is the more profitable business, keeping 19.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRSP's -138.6%. On growth, CRSP holds the edge at +68.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $2.5B | $4.4B | $132M | $4M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$66M | -$313M | $1.1B | -$355M | -$531M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$45M | -$226M | $853M | -$65M | -$569M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$56M | $92M | $989M | -$384M | -$401M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +65.2% | +67.1% | -64.2% | -53.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -13.0% | +20.9% | -2.8% | -134.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -9.0% | +19.4% | -49.2% | -138.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +3.7% | +22.5% | -2.9% | -97.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +38.8% | +4.8% | -100.0% | +68.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +78.8% | -20.0% | +6.1% | +26.6% | +19.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ILMN leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $70M | $30.4B | $24.5B | $3.0B | $4.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15M | $29.5B | $25.6B | $3.0B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.99x | -139.52x | 29.54x | -35.84x | -7.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 30.83x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 6.98x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 22.56x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 13.17x | 5.64x | 21.34x | 1368.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.07x | 16.93x | 9.22x | 2.32x | 2.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 278.35x | 26.26x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ILMN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ILMN delivers a 32.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-197 for BMEA. BMEA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ILMN's 0.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ILMN scores 8/9 vs CRSP's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -196.7% | -15.1% | +32.8% | -5.9% | -30.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -77.1% | -10.4% | +13.4% | -4.6% | -24.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -36.1% | +16.8% | -31.1% | -22.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -153.8% | -18.3% | +17.6% | -33.3% | -26.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.13x | 0.94x | 0.24x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$54M | -$862M | $1.1B | -$1M | $40M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $56M | $1.1B | $1.4B | $295M | $355M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $214M | $2.6B | $294M | $395M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -34.29x | 12.09x | 1.08x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTRA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTRA five years ago would be worth $20,440 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $569 for BMEA. Over the past 12 months, ILMN leads with a +82.7% total return vs BMEA's -55.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTRA at 62.4% vs BMEA's -69.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.7% | -7.3% | +19.8% | +7.0% | -7.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -55.2% | +29.0% | +82.7% | +66.5% | +20.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.1% | +328.7% | -20.4% | -12.0% | -16.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.3% | +104.4% | -63.4% | -68.4% | -61.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.1% | +1731.3% | +18.6% | +54.8% | +253.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -69.2% | +62.4% | -7.3% | -4.2% | -6.0% |
Risk & Volatility
ILMN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ILMN is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BEAM's 2.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ILMN currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs BMEA's 38.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.78x | 1.24x | 0.99x | 2.18x | 1.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.08 | $256.36 | $177.22 | $36.44 | $78.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.87 | $131.81 | $85.77 | $15.60 | $39.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +38.0% | +82.7% | +90.8% | +79.7% | +63.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.2 | 55.9 | 66.4 | 48.4 | 45.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 1.4M | 1.7M | 1.9M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BMEA as "Buy", NTRA as "Buy", ILMN as "Buy", BEAM as "Buy", CRSP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1626.5% upside for BMEA (target: $20) vs -5.9% for ILMN (target: $151).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.20 | $261.00 | $151.40 | $48.00 | $71.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 27 | 50 | 27 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ILMN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NTRA leads in 1 (Total Returns).
BMEA vs NTRA vs ILMN vs BEAM vs CRSP: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BMEA or NTRA or ILMN or BEAM or CRSP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Beam Therapeutics Inc.
(BEAM) is the stronger pick with 120. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -90. 0% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP). Illumina, Inc. (ILMN) offers the better valuation at 29. 5x trailing P/E (30. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Biomea Fusion, Inc. (BMEA) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BMEA or NTRA or ILMN or BEAM or CRSP?
Over the past 5 years, Natera, Inc.
(NTRA) delivered a total return of +104. 4%, compared to -94. 3% for Biomea Fusion, Inc. (BMEA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTRA returned +1731% versus BMEA's -93. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BMEA or NTRA or ILMN or BEAM or CRSP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Beam Therapeutics Inc. 's 2. 18β — meaning BEAM is approximately 121% more volatile than ILMN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Biomea Fusion, Inc. (BMEA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 94% for Illumina, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BMEA or NTRA or ILMN or BEAM or CRSP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Beam Therapeutics Inc.
(BEAM) is pulling ahead at 120. 0% versus -90. 0% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Illumina, Inc. grew EPS 170. 9% year-over-year, compared to -49. 1% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRSP leads at 100. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BMEA or NTRA or ILMN or BEAM or CRSP?
Illumina, Inc.
(ILMN) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 6% net margin versus -165. 7% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG — meaning it keeps 19. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ILMN leads at 19. 9% versus -161. 9% for CRSP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BEAM leads at 84. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BMEA or NTRA or ILMN or BEAM or CRSP more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BMEA: 1626.
5% to $20. 20.
07Which pays a better dividend — BMEA or NTRA or ILMN or BEAM or CRSP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is BMEA or NTRA or ILMN or BEAM or CRSP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Natera, Inc.
(NTRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 24), +1731% 10Y return). Beam Therapeutics Inc. (BEAM) carries a higher beta of 2. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTRA: +1731%, BEAM: +54. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BMEA and NTRA and ILMN and BEAM and CRSP?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BMEA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTRA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ILMN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BEAM is a small-cap high-growth stock; CRSP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.