Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BMR vs SSYS vs DGII vs DDD vs NNDM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BMR
Beamr Imaging Ltd.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$30M
5Y Perf.-2.0%
SSYS
Stratasys Ltd.

Computer Hardware

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$734M
5Y Perf.-48.5%
DGII
Digi International Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.48B
5Y Perf.+95.3%
DDD
3D Systems Corporation

Computer Hardware

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$361M
5Y Perf.-77.0%
NNDM
Nano Dimension Ltd.

Computer Hardware

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$332M
5Y Perf.-45.3%

BMR vs SSYS vs DGII vs DDD vs NNDM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BMR logoBMR
SSYS logoSSYS
DGII logoDGII
DDD logoDDD
NNDM logoNNDM
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationComputer HardwareCommunication EquipmentComputer HardwareComputer Hardware
Market Cap$30M$734M$2.48B$361M$332M
Revenue (TTM)$6M$548M$475M$387M$118M
Net Income (TTM)$-6M$-115M$43M$64M$-338M
Gross Margin92.7%43.1%63.4%33.9%34.5%
Operating Margin-106.9%-13.9%13.2%-24.8%-91.4%
Forward P/E72.5x26.9x13.0x158.0x
Total Debt$250K$27M$180M$61M$9M
Cash & Equiv.$16M$95M$22M$96M$205M

BMR vs SSYS vs DGII vs DDD vs NNDMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BMR
SSYS
DGII
DDD
NNDM
StockMar 23May 26Return
Beamr Imaging Ltd. (BMR)10098.0-2.0%
Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS)10051.5-48.5%
Digi International … (DGII)100195.3+95.3%
3D Systems Corporat… (DDD)10023.0-77.0%
Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM)10054.7-45.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BMR vs SSYS vs DGII vs DDD vs NNDM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: DDD leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Digi International Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. NNDM also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BMR
Beamr Imaging Ltd.
The Technology Pick

BMR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
SSYS
Stratasys Ltd.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, SSYS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
DGII
Digi International Inc.
The Income Pick

DGII is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • beta 1.35
  • 497.5% 10Y total return vs BMR's -40.9%
  • Beta 1.35 vs DDD's 3.06
  • +105.4% vs BMR's -27.0%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
DDD
3D Systems Corporation
The Value Play

DDD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (13.0x vs 158.0x)
  • 16.7% margin vs NNDM's -286.7%
  • 11.5% ROA vs NNDM's -48.4%, ROIC -28.8% vs -15.0%
Best for: value and quality
NNDM
Nano Dimension Ltd.
The Growth Play

NNDM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 77.3%, EPS growth -211.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.66, Low D/E 1.7%, current ratio 10.02x
  • Beta 1.66, current ratio 10.02x
  • 77.3% revenue growth vs DDD's -12.1%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNNDM logoNNDM77.3% revenue growth vs DDD's -12.1%
ValueDDD logoDDDLower P/E (13.0x vs 158.0x)
Quality / MarginsDDD logoDDD16.7% margin vs NNDM's -286.7%
Stability / SafetyDGII logoDGIIBeta 1.35 vs DDD's 3.06
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)DGII logoDGII+105.4% vs BMR's -27.0%
Efficiency (ROA)DDD logoDDD11.5% ROA vs NNDM's -48.4%, ROIC -28.8% vs -15.0%

BMR vs SSYS vs DGII vs DDD vs NNDM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BMRBeamr Imaging Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

SSYSStratasys Ltd.
FY 2025
Product
69.0%$380M
Services Member
31.0%$171M
DGIIDigi International Inc.
FY 2025
Product
68.9%$297M
Service
31.1%$134M
DDD3D Systems Corporation
FY 2025
Product
57.7%$223M
Service
42.3%$163M
NNDMNano Dimension Ltd.
FY 2025
Product
78.5%$80M
Service
21.5%$22M

BMR vs SSYS vs DGII vs DDD vs NNDM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLDGIILAGGINGNNDM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — DGII and DDD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

SSYS is the larger business by revenue, generating $548M annually — 90.0x BMR's $6M. DDD is the more profitable business, keeping 16.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NNDM's -2.9%. On growth, NNDM holds the edge at +106.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBMR logoBMRBeamr Imaging Ltd.SSYS logoSSYSStratasys Ltd.DGII logoDGIIDigi Internationa…DDD logoDDD3D Systems Corpor…NNDM logoNNDMNano Dimension Lt…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$6M$548M$475M$387M$118M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$6M-$44M$90M-$78M-$89M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$6M-$115M$43M$64M-$338M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$4M-$10M$127M-$98M-$89M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+92.7%+43.1%+63.4%+33.9%+34.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-106.9%-13.9%+13.2%-24.8%-91.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-103.7%-21.0%+9.1%+16.7%-2.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-69.6%-1.8%+26.7%-25.3%-75.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.7%-2.5%+25.1%-4.3%+106.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-61.5%-55.6%+3.6%+116.0%+100.0%
Evenly matched — DGII and DDD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — BMR and DGII and DDD and NNDM each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 13.0x trailing earnings, DDD trades at a 79% valuation discount to DGII's 60.9x P/E.

MetricBMR logoBMRBeamr Imaging Ltd.SSYS logoSSYSStratasys Ltd.DGII logoDGIIDigi Internationa…DDD logoDDD3D Systems Corpor…NNDM logoNNDMNano Dimension Lt…
Market CapShares × price$30M$734M$2.5B$361M$332M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$14M$666M$2.6B$326M$137M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-8.86x-6.66x60.91x13.00x-1.15x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.72.51x26.89x158.00x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.97x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple29.22x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue9.88x1.33x5.76x0.93x3.24x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.40x0.82x3.90x1.79x0.62x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF23.55x
Evenly matched — BMR and DGII and DDD and NNDM each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

DDD leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

DDD delivers a 30.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $-59 for NNDM. BMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DGII's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SSYS scores 6/9 vs NNDM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricBMR logoBMRBeamr Imaging Ltd.SSYS logoSSYSStratasys Ltd.DGII logoDGIIDigi Internationa…DDD logoDDD3D Systems Corpor…NNDM logoNNDMNano Dimension Lt…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-34.6%-13.4%+6.7%+30.1%-58.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-32.6%-10.5%+4.8%+11.5%-48.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-50.8%-5.8%+5.7%-28.8%-15.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-20.3%-6.6%+7.3%-22.1%-12.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–936543
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.03x0.28x0.25x0.02x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$16M-$68M$158M-$35M-$195M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$16M$95M$22M$96M$205M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$250,000$27M$180M$61M$9M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-20.50x21.93x51.44x-209.20x
DDD leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

DGII leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in DGII five years ago would be worth $37,546 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,390 for DDD. Over the past 12 months, DGII leads with a +105.4% total return vs BMR's -27.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DGII at 28.2% vs DDD's -35.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBMR logoBMRBeamr Imaging Ltd.SSYS logoSSYSStratasys Ltd.DGII logoDGIIDigi Internationa…DDD logoDDD3D Systems Corpor…NNDM logoNNDMNano Dimension Lt…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+11.4%-5.4%+52.4%+33.5%+1.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-27.0%-23.5%+105.4%+9.8%-4.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+28.7%-40.6%+110.5%-72.8%-40.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-40.9%-54.3%+275.5%-86.1%-74.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-40.9%-59.0%+497.5%-80.5%-97.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+8.8%-16.0%+28.2%-35.2%-15.8%
DGII leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

DGII leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

DGII is the less volatile stock with a 1.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DDD's 3.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DGII currently trades 94.2% from its 52-week high vs BMR's 45.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBMR logoBMRBeamr Imaging Ltd.SSYS logoSSYSStratasys Ltd.DGII logoDGIIDigi Internationa…DDD logoDDD3D Systems Corpor…NNDM logoNNDMNano Dimension Lt…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.43x1.82x1.35x3.06x1.66x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.32$12.81$69.81$3.80$2.32
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.25$7.34$30.20$1.32$1.31
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+45.1%+66.5%+94.2%+65.0%+68.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.342.676.356.654.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded101K831K269K2.7M2.0M
DGII leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: SSYS as "Buy", DGII as "Buy", DDD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 102.4% upside for DDD (target: $5) vs 3.8% for DGII (target: $68).

MetricBMR logoBMRBeamr Imaging Ltd.SSYS logoSSYSStratasys Ltd.DGII logoDGIIDigi Internationa…DDD logoDDD3D Systems Corpor…NNDM logoNNDMNano Dimension Lt…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$13.50$68.25$5.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts361836
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+7.5%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

DGII leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). DDD leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallDigi International Inc. (DGII)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BMR vs SSYS vs DGII vs DDD vs NNDM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BMR or SSYS or DGII or DDD or NNDM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Nano Dimension Ltd.

(NNDM) is the stronger pick with 77. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 1% for 3D Systems Corporation (DDD). 3D Systems Corporation (DDD) offers the better valuation at 13. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BMR or SSYS or DGII or DDD or NNDM?

On trailing P/E, 3D Systems Corporation (DDD) is the cheapest at 13.

0x versus Digi International Inc. at 60. 9x. On forward P/E, Digi International Inc. is actually cheaper at 26. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BMR or SSYS or DGII or DDD or NNDM?

Over the past 5 years, Digi International Inc.

(DGII) delivered a total return of +275. 5%, compared to -86. 1% for 3D Systems Corporation (DDD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DGII returned +497. 5% versus NNDM's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BMR or SSYS or DGII or DDD or NNDM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Digi International Inc.

(DGII) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 35β versus 3D Systems Corporation's 3. 06β — meaning DDD is approximately 126% more volatile than DGII relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Beamr Imaging Ltd. (BMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 28% for Digi International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BMR or SSYS or DGII or DDD or NNDM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nano Dimension Ltd.

(NNDM) is pulling ahead at 77. 3% versus -12. 1% for 3D Systems Corporation (DDD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: 3D Systems Corporation grew EPS 109. 8% year-over-year, compared to -211. 4% for Nano Dimension Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NNDM leads at 32. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BMR or SSYS or DGII or DDD or NNDM?

3D Systems Corporation (DDD) is the more profitable company, earning 16.

7% net margin versus -286. 3% for Nano Dimension Ltd. — meaning it keeps 16. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DGII leads at 13. 1% versus -104. 9% for BMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BMR leads at 92. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BMR or SSYS or DGII or DDD or NNDM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Digi International Inc.

(DGII) trades at 26. 9x forward P/E versus 158. 0x for Nano Dimension Ltd. — 131. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DDD: 102. 4% to $5. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BMR or SSYS or DGII or DDD or NNDM?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is BMR or SSYS or DGII or DDD or NNDM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Digi International Inc.

(DGII) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+497. 5% 10Y return). 3D Systems Corporation (DDD) carries a higher beta of 3. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DGII: +497. 5%, DDD: -80. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BMR and SSYS and DGII and DDD and NNDM?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SSYS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DGII is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DDD is a small-cap deep-value stock; NNDM is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BMR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 55%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SSYS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 25%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DGII

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DDD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NNDM

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 53%
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BMR and SSYS and DGII and DDD and NNDM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BMR: 6.7% · SSYS: -2.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.