BN vs CG

For growth investors, The Carlyle Group Inc.

(CG) is the stronger pick with 19. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 7% for Brookfield Corporation (BN). The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG) offers the better valuation at 22. 5x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brookfield Corporation (BN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, The Carlyle Group Inc.

(CG) is the cheapest at 22. 5x versus Brookfield Corporation at 9999. 0x. On forward P/E, The Carlyle Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 4x.

Over the past 5 years, Brookfield Corporation (BN) delivered a total return of +89.

3%, compared to +23. 4% for The Carlyle Group Inc. (CG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BN returned +308. 9% versus CG's +281. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brookfield Corporation (BN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

57β versus The Carlyle Group Inc. 's 1. 88β — meaning CG is approximately 20% more volatile than BN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Brookfield Corporation (BN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 159% versus 197% for The Carlyle Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Carlyle Group Inc.

(CG) is pulling ahead at 19. 8% versus -9. 7% for Brookfield Corporation (BN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Carlyle Group Inc. grew EPS -21. 3% year-over-year, compared to -99. 8% for Brookfield Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

The Carlyle Group Inc.

(CG) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 5% net margin versus 1. 7% for Brookfield Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BN leads at 39. 9% versus 26. 2% for CG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CG leads at 65. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, The Carlyle Group Inc.

(CG) trades at 11. 4x forward P/E versus 16. 7x for Brookfield Corporation — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CG: 37. 4% to $67. 33.

In this comparison, CG (2.

8% yield) pays a dividend. BN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Carlyle Group Inc.

(CG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 8% yield, +281. 0% 10Y return). Brookfield Corporation (BN) carries a higher beta of 1. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CG: +281. 0%, BN: +308. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. CG pays a dividend while BN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.