Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BNR vs DBVT vs EXAS vs ALKS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Biotechnology
BNR vs DBVT vs EXAS vs ALKS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $287M | $1712.35T | $20.02B | $5.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $539M | $0.00 | $3.25B | $1.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-121M | $-168M | $-208M | $153M |
| Gross Margin | 73.0% | — | 69.7% | 65.4% |
| Operating Margin | -23.1% | — | -6.4% | 12.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 582.8x | 24.8x |
| Total Debt | $52M | $22M | $2.52B | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $520M | $194M | $956M | $1.12B |
BNR vs DBVT vs EXAS vs ALKS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burning Rock Biotec… (BNR) | 100 | 6.1 | -93.9% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 45.5 | -54.5% |
| Exact Sciences Corp… (EXAS) | 100 | 118.9 | +18.9% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 182.4 | +82.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BNR vs DBVT vs EXAS vs ALKS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BNR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +6.1% vs ALKS's +16.5%
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.26
EXAS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 17.7%, EPS growth 80.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.9%
- 16.7% 10Y total return vs ALKS's -11.0%
- 17.7% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
- Beta 0.12 vs BNR's 1.87
ALKS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 3.55x
- Beta 1.06, current ratio 3.55x
- Lower P/E (24.8x vs 582.8x)
- 9.8% margin vs BNR's -22.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.7% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.8x vs 582.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.8% margin vs BNR's -22.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs BNR's 1.87 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.1% vs ALKS's +16.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
BNR vs DBVT vs EXAS vs ALKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BNR vs DBVT vs EXAS vs ALKS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALKS leads in 2 of 6 categories
EXAS leads 2 • BNR leads 0 • DBVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXAS and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $3.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALKS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BNR's -22.5%. On growth, ALKS holds the edge at +28.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $539M | $0 | $3.2B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$64M | -$112M | -$41M | $212M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$121M | -$168M | -$208M | $153M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$38M | -$151M | $357M | $392M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.0% | — | +69.7% | +65.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -23.1% | — | -6.4% | +12.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -22.5% | — | -6.4% | +9.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.0% | — | +11.0% | +25.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | — | +23.1% | +28.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +54.9% | +91.5% | +90.4% | -4.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BNR and DBVT and EXAS and ALKS each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $287M | $1712.35T | $20.0B | $5.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $219M | $1712.35T | $21.6B | $4.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.35x | -0.76x | -95.37x | 24.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 582.83x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 17.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.79x | — | 6.16x | 4.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.00x | 0.66x | 8.24x | 3.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 56.10x | 12.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. ALKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXAS's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EXAS scores 7/9 vs DBVT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.4% | -130.2% | -8.7% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -14.4% | -89.0% | -3.5% | +5.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -192.3% | — | -3.6% | +18.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -51.2% | -145.7% | -4.0% | +14.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.13x | 1.05x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$468M | -$172M | $1.6B | -$1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $520M | $194M | $956M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $52M | $22M | $2.5B | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -189.82x | -5.47x | 32.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EXAS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALKS five years ago would be worth $16,091 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $610 for BNR. Over the past 12 months, BNR leads with a +614.7% total return vs ALKS's +16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EXAS at 15.2% vs BNR's -17.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.8% | +4.9% | +3.1% | +25.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +614.7% | +110.4% | +96.9% | +16.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.0% | +19.7% | +53.0% | +14.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.9% | -69.1% | +0.4% | +60.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.3% | -87.0% | +1669.1% | -11.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.6% | +6.2% | +15.2% | +4.6% |
Risk & Volatility
EXAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EXAS is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BNR's 1.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EXAS currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs BNR's 39.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.87x | 1.26x | 0.12x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.72 | $26.18 | $104.98 | $36.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.26 | $7.53 | $38.81 | $25.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +39.7% | +76.3% | +99.9% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.6 | 48.1 | 76.4 | 60.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 30K | 252K | 4.2M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BNR as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", EXAS as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs -1.6% for EXAS (target: $103).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 | $103.18 | $44.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 15 | 41 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.5% |
ALKS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EXAS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
BNR vs DBVT vs EXAS vs ALKS: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BNR or DBVT or EXAS or ALKS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) is the stronger pick with 17.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Alkermes plc (ALKS) offers the better valuation at 24. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Burning Rock Biotech Limited (BNR) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BNR or DBVT or EXAS or ALKS?
Over the past 5 years, Alkermes plc (ALKS) delivered a total return of +60.
9%, compared to -93. 9% for Burning Rock Biotech Limited (BNR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXAS returned +1669% versus BNR's -93. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BNR or DBVT or EXAS or ALKS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
12β versus Burning Rock Biotech Limited's 1. 87β — meaning BNR is approximately 1456% more volatile than EXAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alkermes plc (ALKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 105% for Exact Sciences Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — BNR or DBVT or EXAS or ALKS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) is pulling ahead at 17.
7% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exact Sciences Corporation grew EPS 80. 3% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXAS leads at 15. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BNR or DBVT or EXAS or ALKS?
Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
4% net margin versus -67. 2% for Burning Rock Biotech Limited — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALKS leads at 17. 2% versus -69. 3% for BNR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BNR or DBVT or EXAS or ALKS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131.
8% to $46. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — BNR or DBVT or EXAS or ALKS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is BNR or DBVT or EXAS or ALKS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
12), +1669% 10Y return). Burning Rock Biotech Limited (BNR) carries a higher beta of 1. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXAS: +1669%, BNR: -93. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BNR and DBVT and EXAS and ALKS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BNR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; EXAS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.