BOKF vs IBOC

For growth investors, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is the stronger pick with 10.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC). International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the cheapest at 11.

0x versus BOK Financial Corporation at 16. 7x. On forward P/E, International Bancshares Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: International Bancshares Corporation wins at 0. 53x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 45x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) delivered a total return of +62.

2%, compared to +61. 1% for International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBOC returned +227. 0% versus BOKF's +172. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

83β versus BOK Financial Corporation's 1. 03β — meaning BOKF is approximately 25% more volatile than IBOC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 80% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is pulling ahead at 10.

4% versus 1. 0% for International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BOK Financial Corporation grew EPS 1. 5% year-over-year, compared to 0. 8% for International Bancshares Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the more profitable company, earning 39.

1% net margin versus 15. 6% for BOK Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBOC leads at 49. 4% versus 19. 8% for BOKF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBOC leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 53x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 45x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) trades at 10. 8x forward P/E versus 13. 3x for BOK Financial Corporation — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IBOC: 17. 1% to $85. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) offers the highest yield at 1. 9%, versus 1. 7% for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF).

For long-horizon retirement investors, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

83), 1. 9% yield, +227. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBOC: +227. 0%, BOKF: +172. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.