Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BOOT vs RCKY vs WTTR vs WWW vs SCVL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
Regulated Water
Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
Apparel - Retail
BOOT vs RCKY vs WTTR vs WWW vs SCVL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories | Regulated Water | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $4.97B | $274M | $1.89B | $1.39B | $487M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.92B | $482M | $1.40B | $1.87B | $1.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $171M | $22M | $22M | $95M | $58M |
| Gross Margin | 37.5% | 40.9% | 18.2% | 47.2% | 36.5% |
| Operating Margin | 11.8% | 7.7% | 2.3% | 7.9% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | 22.3x | 9.9x | 41.7x | 12.8x | 9.4x |
| Total Debt | $563M | $124M | $374M | $652M | $368M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70M | $3M | $18M | $206M | $109M |
BOOT vs RCKY vs WTTR vs WWW vs SCVL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boot Barn Holdings,… (BOOT) | 100 | 760.6 | +660.6% |
| Rocky Brands, Inc. (RCKY) | 100 | 175.0 | +75.0% |
| Select Water Soluti… (WTTR) | 100 | 283.2 | +183.2% |
| Wolverine World Wid… (WWW) | 100 | 81.3 | -18.7% |
| Shoe Carnival, Inc. (SCVL) | 100 | 136.9 | +36.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BOOT vs RCKY vs WTTR vs WWW vs SCVL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BOOT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.6%, EPS growth 22.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- 19.6% 10Y total return vs RCKY's 250.3%
- 14.6% revenue growth vs WTTR's -3.1%
- 8.9% margin vs WTTR's 1.5%
RCKY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
WTTR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, Low D/E 40.4%, current ratio 1.57x
- Beta 1.09 vs WWW's 1.74, lower leverage
- +134.2% vs SCVL's +3.3%
Among these 5 stocks, WWW doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SCVL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.45, yield 3.0%
- PEG 0.73 vs RCKY's 14.34
- Beta 1.45, yield 3.0%, current ratio 4.11x
- Lower P/E (9.4x vs 12.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.6% revenue growth vs WTTR's -3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.4x vs 12.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.9% margin vs WTTR's 1.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs WWW's 1.74, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs RCKY's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +134.2% vs SCVL's +3.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.6% ROA vs WTTR's 1.3%, ROIC 12.1% vs 2.3% |
BOOT vs RCKY vs WTTR vs WWW vs SCVL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BOOT vs RCKY vs WTTR vs WWW vs SCVL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SCVL leads in 2 of 6 categories
WTTR leads 2 • BOOT leads 1 • RCKY leads 0 • WWW leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BOOT and WWW each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOOT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 4.0x RCKY's $482M. BOOT is the more profitable business, keeping 8.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WTTR's 1.5%. On growth, BOOT holds the edge at +18.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $482M | $1.4B | $1.9B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $297M | $47M | $217M | $163M | $96M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $171M | $22M | $22M | $95M | $58M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$141M | $10M | -$95M | $126M | $31M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.5% | +40.9% | +18.2% | +47.2% | +36.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +7.7% | +2.3% | +7.9% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | +4.6% | +1.5% | +5.1% | +5.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.4% | +2.0% | -6.8% | +6.7% | +2.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.7% | +9.1% | -2.3% | +4.6% | -3.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.2% | +34.4% | -4.4% | +102.0% | -24.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SCVL leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.2x trailing earnings, WWW trades at a 100% valuation discount to WTTR's 84.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SCVL offers better value at 0.51x vs RCKY's 14.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.0B | $274M | $1.9B | $1.4B | $487M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.5B | $395M | $2.2B | $1.8B | $747M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.78x | 12.26x | 84.10x | 0.18x | 6.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.26x | 9.89x | 41.66x | 12.80x | 9.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.95x | 14.34x | — | — | 0.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.10x | 8.40x | 10.70x | 12.25x | 6.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.60x | 0.57x | 1.34x | 0.74x | 0.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.44x | 1.08x | 1.88x | 2.59x | 0.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 28.14x | — | 11.11x | 7.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BOOT leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WWW delivers a 17.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $2 for WTTR. WTTR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.40x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WWW's 1.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WWW scores 8/9 vs WTTR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.2% | +9.2% | +2.2% | +17.7% | +8.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.6% | +4.7% | +1.3% | +5.5% | +4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.1% | +7.6% | +2.3% | +11.6% | +7.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.7% | +9.9% | +2.9% | +12.9% | +9.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.50x | 0.49x | 0.40x | 1.22x | 0.57x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $493M | $121M | $356M | $446M | $259M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $70M | $3M | $18M | $206M | $109M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $563M | $124M | $374M | $652M | $368M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 159.63x | 2.38x | 1.54x | 3.19x | 329.89x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WTTR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WTTR five years ago would be worth $25,837 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,310 for WWW. Over the past 12 months, WTTR leads with a +134.2% total return vs SCVL's +3.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WTTR at 33.1% vs SCVL's -5.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.5% | +27.1% | +52.9% | -5.5% | +3.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.7% | +91.9% | +134.2% | +17.7% | +3.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +127.9% | +89.0% | +135.9% | +16.8% | -14.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.0% | -39.9% | +158.4% | -56.9% | -38.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1960.2% | +250.3% | +26.6% | +7.2% | +62.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.6% | +23.6% | +33.1% | +5.3% | -5.2% |
Risk & Volatility
WTTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WTTR is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WWW's 1.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WTTR currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs WWW's 51.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.68x | 1.36x | 1.09x | 1.74x | 1.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $210.25 | $48.70 | $17.95 | $32.80 | $26.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $110.54 | $18.86 | $7.20 | $13.47 | $15.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.7% | +74.5% | +93.7% | +51.9% | +67.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.0 | 34.6 | 69.4 | 50.7 | 50.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 616K | 63K | 1.7M | 1.0M | 395K |
Analyst Outlook
SCVL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BOOT as "Buy", RCKY as "Buy", WTTR as "Buy", WWW as "Hold", SCVL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 43.3% upside for RCKY (target: $52) vs -4.9% for WTTR (target: $16). For income investors, SCVL offers the higher dividend yield at 3.00% vs RCKY's 1.70%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $231.50 | $52.00 | $16.00 | $21.33 | $22.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 4 | 14 | 38 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% | +1.9% | +2.4% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.62 | $0.32 | $0.41 | $0.53 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.4% | +1.0% | 0.0% |
SCVL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). WTTR leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
BOOT vs RCKY vs WTTR vs WWW vs SCVL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BOOT or RCKY or WTTR or WWW or SCVL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
(BOOT) is the stronger pick with 14. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR). Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW) offers the better valuation at 0. 2x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BOOT or RCKY or WTTR or WWW or SCVL?
On trailing P/E, Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
(WWW) is the cheapest at 0. 2x versus Select Water Solutions, Inc. at 84. 1x. On forward P/E, Shoe Carnival, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Shoe Carnival, Inc. wins at 0. 73x versus Rocky Brands, Inc. 's 14. 34x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BOOT or RCKY or WTTR or WWW or SCVL?
Over the past 5 years, Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) delivered a total return of +158. 4%, compared to -56. 9% for Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOOT returned +1960% versus WWW's +7. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BOOT or RCKY or WTTR or WWW or SCVL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus Wolverine World Wide, Inc. 's 1. 74β — meaning WWW is approximately 60% more volatile than WTTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 40% versus 122% for Wolverine World Wide, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BOOT or RCKY or WTTR or WWW or SCVL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
(BOOT) is pulling ahead at 14. 6% versus -3. 1% for Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wolverine World Wide, Inc. grew EPS 159. 5% year-over-year, compared to -33. 3% for Select Water Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BOOT leads at 8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BOOT or RCKY or WTTR or WWW or SCVL?
Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
(BOOT) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 5% net margin versus 1. 5% for Select Water Solutions, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BOOT leads at 12. 5% versus 2. 5% for WTTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WWW leads at 47. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BOOT or RCKY or WTTR or WWW or SCVL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Shoe Carnival, Inc. (SCVL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 73x versus Rocky Brands, Inc. 's 14. 34x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Shoe Carnival, Inc. (SCVL) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 41. 7x for Select Water Solutions, Inc. — 32. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RCKY: 43. 3% to $52. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BOOT or RCKY or WTTR or WWW or SCVL?
In this comparison, SCVL (3.
0% yield), WWW (2. 4% yield), WTTR (1. 9% yield), RCKY (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. BOOT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BOOT or RCKY or WTTR or WWW or SCVL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), 1. 9% yield). Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW) carries a higher beta of 1. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WTTR: +26. 6%, WWW: +7. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BOOT and RCKY and WTTR and WWW and SCVL?
These companies operate in different sectors (BOOT (Consumer Cyclical) and RCKY (Consumer Cyclical) and WTTR (Utilities) and WWW (Consumer Cyclical) and SCVL (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BOOT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCKY is a small-cap deep-value stock; WTTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WWW is a small-cap deep-value stock; SCVL is a small-cap deep-value stock. RCKY, WTTR, WWW, SCVL pay a dividend while BOOT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.