Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BOOT vs WTTR vs RCKY vs NCSM vs NINE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
BOOT vs WTTR vs RCKY vs NCSM vs NINE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Regulated Water | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $4.97B | $1.89B | $282M | $106M | $434M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.92B | $1.40B | $482M | $180M | $571M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $171M | $22M | $22M | $19M | $-41M |
| Gross Margin | 37.5% | 18.2% | 40.9% | 36.7% | 11.5% |
| Operating Margin | 11.8% | 2.3% | 7.7% | 5.2% | 2.0% |
| Forward P/E | 22.3x | 35.1x | 10.2x | 11.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $563M | $374M | $124M | $13M | $383M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70M | $18M | $3M | $37M | $18M |
BOOT vs WTTR vs RCKY vs NCSM vs NINE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boot Barn Holdings,… (BOOT) | 100 | 760.2 | +660.2% |
| Select Water Soluti… (WTTR) | 100 | 282.8 | +182.8% |
| Rocky Brands, Inc. (RCKY) | 100 | 180.2 | +80.2% |
| NCS Multistage Hold… (NCSM) | 100 | 388.1 | +288.1% |
| Nine Energy Service… (NINE) | 100 | 493.1 | +393.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BOOT vs WTTR vs RCKY vs NCSM vs NINE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BOOT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 14.6%, EPS growth 22.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- 19.6% 10Y total return vs WTTR's 26.5%
- PEG 0.76 vs RCKY's 14.77
- 14.6% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0%
WTTR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.07, yield 1.9%
- 1.9% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs RCKY's 1.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, RCKY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NCSM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.16, Low D/E 9.0%, current ratio 4.27x
- Beta 0.16, current ratio 4.27x
- 10.8% margin vs NINE's -7.2%
- Beta 0.16 vs NINE's 3.04
NINE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +13.3% vs NCSM's +23.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.6% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.8% margin vs NINE's -7.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.16 vs NINE's 3.04 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs RCKY's 1.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.3% vs NCSM's +23.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs NINE's -11.5%, ROIC 7.9% vs 0.7% |
BOOT vs WTTR vs RCKY vs NCSM vs NINE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BOOT vs WTTR vs RCKY vs NCSM vs NINE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NCSM leads in 2 of 6 categories
BOOT leads 1 • NINE leads 1 • WTTR leads 1 • RCKY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOOT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOOT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 10.7x NCSM's $180M. NCSM is the more profitable business, keeping 10.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NINE's -7.2%. On growth, BOOT holds the edge at +18.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $1.4B | $482M | $180M | $571M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $297M | $217M | $47M | $15M | $61M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $171M | $22M | $22M | $19M | -$41M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$141M | -$95M | $10M | $24M | -$7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.5% | +18.2% | +40.9% | +36.7% | +11.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +2.3% | +7.7% | +5.2% | +2.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | +1.5% | +4.6% | +10.8% | -7.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.4% | -6.8% | +2.0% | +13.2% | -1.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.7% | -2.3% | +9.1% | -8.7% | -4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.2% | -4.4% | +34.4% | -109.3% | -34.6% |
Valuation Metrics
NCSM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.7x trailing earnings, NCSM trades at a 94% valuation discount to WTTR's 84.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BOOT offers better value at 0.95x vs RCKY's 14.77x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.0B | $1.9B | $282M | $106M | $434M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.5B | $2.2B | $403M | $82M | $798M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.77x | 84.00x | 12.63x | 4.67x | -8.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.25x | 35.09x | 10.19x | 11.82x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.95x | — | 14.77x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.09x | 10.69x | 8.58x | 4.65x | 339.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.60x | 1.34x | 0.58x | 0.57x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.44x | 1.88x | 1.12x | 0.77x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 28.99x | 5.05x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NCSM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NCSM delivers a 14.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $2 for WTTR. NCSM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOOT's 0.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RCKY scores 7/9 vs NINE's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.2% | +2.2% | +9.2% | +14.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.6% | +1.3% | +4.7% | +11.4% | -11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.1% | +2.3% | +7.6% | +7.9% | +0.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.7% | +2.9% | +9.9% | +8.4% | +0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.50x | 0.40x | 0.49x | 0.09x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $493M | $356M | $121M | -$24M | $364M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $70M | $18M | $3M | $37M | $18M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $563M | $374M | $124M | $13M | $383M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 159.63x | 1.54x | 2.38x | 28.21x | 0.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NINE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NINE five years ago would be worth $55,000 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,415 for RCKY. Over the past 12 months, NINE leads with a +1330.0% total return vs NCSM's +23.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NINE at 36.5% vs RCKY's 24.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.5% | +52.8% | +30.9% | +1.8% | +2727.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +37.4% | +121.2% | +85.1% | +23.4% | +1330.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +127.8% | +135.7% | +94.5% | +107.6% | +154.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +129.0% | +179.2% | -35.9% | +52.5% | +450.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1959.3% | +26.5% | +259.4% | -89.9% | -61.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.6% | +33.1% | +24.8% | +27.6% | +36.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NCSM and NINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NCSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NINE's 3.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NINE currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs NCSM's 46.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.64x | 1.07x | 1.28x | 0.16x | 3.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $210.25 | $17.95 | $48.70 | $87.36 | $10.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $111.60 | $7.20 | $19.41 | $28.64 | $0.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.7% | +93.6% | +76.8% | +46.2% | +97.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.6 | 59.8 | 34.9 | 27.7 | 81.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 618K | 1.7M | 61K | 39K | 102K |
Analyst Outlook
WTTR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BOOT as "Buy", WTTR as "Buy", RCKY as "Buy", NINE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 79.8% upside for NINE (target: $18) vs 17.1% for WTTR (target: $20). For income investors, WTTR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.93% vs RCKY's 1.65%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $231.50 | $19.67 | $52.00 | — | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 14 | 4 | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.9% | +1.6% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 | 0 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.32 | $0.62 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | +0.1% | +0.3% | 0.0% |
NCSM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BOOT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
BOOT vs WTTR vs RCKY vs NCSM vs NINE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BOOT or WTTR or RCKY or NCSM or NINE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
(BOOT) is the stronger pick with 14. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM) offers the better valuation at 4. 7x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BOOT or WTTR or RCKY or NCSM or NINE?
On trailing P/E, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the cheapest at 4. 7x versus Select Water Solutions, Inc. at 84. 0x. On forward P/E, Rocky Brands, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 76x versus Rocky Brands, Inc. 's 14. 77x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BOOT or WTTR or RCKY or NCSM or NINE?
Over the past 5 years, Nine Energy Service, Inc.
(NINE) delivered a total return of +450. 0%, compared to -35. 9% for Rocky Brands, Inc. (RCKY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOOT returned +1959% versus NCSM's -89. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BOOT or WTTR or RCKY or NCSM or NINE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 16β versus Nine Energy Service, Inc. 's 3. 04β — meaning NINE is approximately 1782% more volatile than NCSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 50% for Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BOOT or WTTR or RCKY or NCSM or NINE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.
(BOOT) is pulling ahead at 14. 6% versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 239. 2% year-over-year, compared to -33. 3% for Select Water Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BOOT leads at 8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BOOT or WTTR or RCKY or NCSM or NINE?
NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus -7. 2% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BOOT leads at 12. 5% versus 2. 0% for NINE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCKY leads at 40. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BOOT or WTTR or RCKY or NCSM or NINE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 76x versus Rocky Brands, Inc. 's 14. 77x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Rocky Brands, Inc. (RCKY) trades at 10. 2x forward P/E versus 35. 1x for Select Water Solutions, Inc. — 24. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NINE: 79. 8% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BOOT or WTTR or RCKY or NCSM or NINE?
In this comparison, WTTR (1.
9% yield), RCKY (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. BOOT, NCSM, NINE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BOOT or WTTR or RCKY or NCSM or NINE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 16)). Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) carries a higher beta of 3. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NCSM: -89. 9%, NINE: -61. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BOOT and WTTR and RCKY and NCSM and NINE?
These companies operate in different sectors (BOOT (Consumer Cyclical) and WTTR (Utilities) and RCKY (Consumer Cyclical) and NCSM (Energy) and NINE (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BOOT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WTTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCKY is a small-cap deep-value stock; NCSM is a small-cap deep-value stock; NINE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. WTTR, RCKY pay a dividend while BOOT, NCSM, NINE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.