Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
BOTJ logo
BOTJ
NKSH logo
NKSH
CARE logo
CARE
CZWI logo
CZWI
FIS logo
FIS
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BOTJ vs NKSH vs CARE vs CZWI vs FIS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BOTJ
Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$112M
5Y Perf.+188.2%
NKSH
National Bankshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$231M
5Y Perf.+27.0%
CARE
Carter Bankshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$662M
5Y Perf.+270.2%
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$207M
5Y Perf.+212.8%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-70.8%

BOTJ vs NKSH vs CARE vs CZWI vs FIS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BOTJ logoBOTJ
NKSH logoNKSH
CARE logoCARE
CZWI logoCZWI
FIS logoFIS
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$112M$231M$662M$207M$20.26B
Revenue (TTM)$62M$85M$252M$90M$11.66B
Net Income (TTM)$9M$16M$31M$14M$2.67B
Gross Margin77.7%65.1%61.2%54.7%37.6%
Operating Margin18.0%22.5%15.9%7.0%17.9%
Forward P/E12.4x11.3x5.5x11.8x6.2x
Total Debt$9M$2M$179M$52M$4.01B
Cash & Equiv.$29M$8M$105M$119M$599M

BOTJ vs NKSH vs CARE vs CZWI vs FISLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BOTJ
NKSH
CARE
CZWI
FIS
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Bank of the James F… (BOTJ)100288.2+188.2%
National Bankshares… (NKSH)100127.0+27.0%
Carter Bankshares, … (CARE)100370.2+270.2%
Citizens Community … (CZWI)100312.8+212.8%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BOTJ vs NKSH vs CARE vs CZWI vs FIS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIS leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. NKSH, CARE, and CZWI also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇FIS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
BOTJ
Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BOTJ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • 155.2% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 149.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 11.0%, current ratio 496.36x
  • NIM 3.2% vs NKSH's 2.5%
  • Beta 0.15 vs NKSH's 0.73
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
NKSH
National Bankshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

NKSH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 7.9%, EPS growth 100.8%
  • 7.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
Best for: growth exposure
CARE
Carter Bankshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CARE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +79.6% vs FIS's -49.4%
Best for: momentum
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
  • 1.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs FIS's 4.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: defensive
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Income Pick

FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 4.2%
  • PEG 0.26 vs CZWI's 2.32
  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 11.3x), PEG 0.26 vs 140.16
  • 22.9% margin vs CARE's 12.5%
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNKSH logoNKSH7.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 11.3x), PEG 0.26 vs 140.16
Quality / MarginsFIS logoFIS22.9% margin vs CARE's 12.5%
Stability / SafetyBOTJ logoBOTJBeta 0.15 vs NKSH's 0.73
DividendsCZWI logoCZWI1.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs FIS's 4.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)CARE logoCARE+79.6% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)FIS logoFIS7.5% ROA vs CARE's 0.7%, ROIC 6.0% vs 5.7%

BOTJ vs NKSH vs CARE vs CZWI vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
BOTJBank of the James Financial Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Community Banking
67.1%$39M
All Other Segments
15.5%$9M
Investment Advisory Services
9.1%$5M
Mortgage
8.3%$5M
NKSHNational Bankshares, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CARECarter Bankshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Bank Owned Life Insurance Income
74.0%$2M
Other Revenue
26.0%$532,000
CZWICitizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$99M
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B

BOTJ vs NKSH vs CARE vs CZWI vs FIS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFISLAGGINGCZWI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 188.5x BOTJ's $62M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CARE's 12.5%.

MetricBOTJ logoBOTJBank of the James…NKSH logoNKSHNational Bankshar…CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$62M$85M$252M$90M$11.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$12M$20M$46M$9M$4.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$9M$16M$31M$14M$2.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$10M$17M$30M$11M$2.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+77.7%+65.1%+61.2%+54.7%+37.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+18.0%+22.5%+15.9%+7.0%+17.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+14.6%+18.6%+12.5%+16.0%+22.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.6%+20.5%+11.9%+12.4%+23.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+66.7%+91.7%+8.3%+63.0%+30.6%
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BOTJ leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 12.4x trailing earnings, BOTJ trades at a 76% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BOTJ offers better value at 0.90x vs NKSH's 140.16x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricBOTJ logoBOTJBank of the James…NKSH logoNKSHNational Bankshar…CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Market CapShares × price$112M$231M$662M$207M$20.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$93M$225M$735M$140M$23.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.44x14.59x21.34x14.70x52.27x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.28x5.47x11.79x6.24x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x140.16x2.90x2.14x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.44x11.74x18.38x15.69x6.50x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.80x2.71x2.60x2.29x1.90x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.41x1.25x1.60x1.11x1.46x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.72x15.27x20.81x19.90x7.21x
BOTJ leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $8 for CARE. NKSH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CARE's 0.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NKSH scores 8/9 vs FIS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBOTJ logoBOTJBank of the James…NKSH logoNKSHNational Bankshar…CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.1%+9.0%+7.6%+7.8%+18.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.9%+0.9%+0.7%+0.8%+7.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.7%+8.4%+5.7%+2.0%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.0%+1.9%+1.5%+0.6%+6.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–978866
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.11x0.01x0.43x0.28x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$20M-$6M$73M-$67M$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$29M$8M$105M$119M$599M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$9M$2M$179M$52M$4.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.80x0.64x0.39x0.16x21.16x
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — BOTJ and CARE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CARE five years ago would be worth $20,802 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CARE leads with a +79.6% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BOTJ at 42.8% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBOTJ logoBOTJBank of the James…NKSH logoNKSHNational Bankshar…CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+34.6%+12.3%+54.3%+24.3%-38.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+75.9%+42.4%+79.6%+52.1%-49.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+191.2%+37.2%+93.9%+153.7%-18.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+55.8%+24.3%+108.0%+69.0%-67.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+155.2%+54.9%+141.7%+149.0%-25.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+42.8%+11.1%+24.7%+36.4%-6.8%
Evenly matched — BOTJ and CARE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BOTJ and CARE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BOTJ is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKSH's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CARE currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBOTJ logoBOTJBank of the James…NKSH logoNKSHNational Bankshar…CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.15x0.73x0.58x0.50x0.61x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$26.49$40.00$29.99$22.62$82.74
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$13.00$24.74$16.14$12.83$37.91
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+93.5%+90.8%+99.6%+94.9%+47.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10072.955.172.851.230.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded14K49K316K41K5.6M
Evenly matched — BOTJ and CARE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — CZWI and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: NKSH as "Buy", CARE as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -4.6% for CARE (target: $29). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs BOTJ's 1.62%.

MetricBOTJ logoBOTJBank of the James…NKSH logoNKSHNational Bankshar…CARE logoCARECarter Bankshares…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$28.50$62.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts45237
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.6%+4.2%+1.7%+4.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00061
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.40$1.51$0.37$1.63
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.0%+3.0%+7.0%
Evenly matched — CZWI and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FIS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BOTJ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallFidelity National Informati… (FIS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BOTJ vs NKSH vs CARE vs CZWI vs FIS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BOTJ or NKSH or CARE or CZWI or FIS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, National Bankshares, Inc.

(NKSH) is the stronger pick with 7. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (BOTJ) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BOTJ or NKSH or CARE or CZWI or FIS?

On trailing P/E, Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.

(BOTJ) is the cheapest at 12. 4x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Carter Bankshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus National Bankshares, Inc. 's 140. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BOTJ or NKSH or CARE or CZWI or FIS?

Over the past 5 years, Carter Bankshares, Inc.

(CARE) delivered a total return of +108. 0%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOTJ returned +155. 2% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BOTJ or NKSH or CARE or CZWI or FIS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.

(BOTJ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 15β versus National Bankshares, Inc. 's 0. 73β — meaning NKSH is approximately 370% more volatile than BOTJ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 43% for Carter Bankshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BOTJ or NKSH or CARE or CZWI or FIS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), National Bankshares, Inc.

(NKSH) is pulling ahead at 7. 9% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: National Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 100. 8% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BOTJ or NKSH or CARE or CZWI or FIS?

National Bankshares, Inc.

(NKSH) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 6% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NKSH leads at 22. 5% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BOTJ leads at 77. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BOTJ or NKSH or CARE or CZWI or FIS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus National Bankshares, Inc. 's 140. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Carter Bankshares, Inc. (CARE) trades at 5. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 6. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BOTJ or NKSH or CARE or CZWI or FIS?

In this comparison, FIS (4.

2% yield), NKSH (4. 2% yield), CZWI (1. 7% yield), BOTJ (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. CARE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is BOTJ or NKSH or CARE or CZWI or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.

(BOTJ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 15), 1. 6% yield, +155. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BOTJ: +155. 2%, CARE: +141. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BOTJ and NKSH and CARE and CZWI and FIS?

These companies operate in different sectors (BOTJ (Financial Services) and NKSH (Financial Services) and CARE (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BOTJ is a small-cap deep-value stock; NKSH is a small-cap deep-value stock; CARE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. BOTJ, NKSH, CZWI, FIS pay a dividend while CARE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.