Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BOXL vs CLFD vs CCOI vs PRSO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BOXL
Boxlight Corporation

Consumer Electronics

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$952K
5Y Perf.-97.2%
CLFD
Clearfield, Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$519M
5Y Perf.+189.5%
CCOI
Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$817M
5Y Perf.-78.2%
PRSO
Peraso Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7M
5Y Perf.-98.3%

BOXL vs CLFD vs CCOI vs PRSO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BOXL logoBOXL
CLFD logoCLFD
CCOI logoCCOI
PRSO logoPRSO
IndustryConsumer ElectronicsCommunication EquipmentTelecommunications ServicesSemiconductors
Market Cap$952K$519M$817M$7M
Revenue (TTM)$109M$136M$949M$13M
Net Income (TTM)$-24M$-9M$-170M$-5M
Gross Margin30.8%37.2%32.4%58.8%
Operating Margin-15.0%1.4%-7.9%-39.3%
Forward P/E75.9x
Total Debt$42M$9M$2.93B$321K
Cash & Equiv.$9M$21M$205M$3M

BOXL vs CLFD vs CCOI vs PRSOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BOXL
CLFD
CCOI
PRSO
StockMay 20May 26Return
Boxlight Corporation (BOXL)1002.8-97.2%
Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD)100289.5+189.5%
Cogent Communicatio… (CCOI)10021.8-78.2%
Peraso Inc. (PRSO)1001.7-98.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BOXL vs CLFD vs CCOI vs PRSO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CLFD leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. PRSO also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BOXL
Boxlight Corporation
The Income Pick

BOXL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.25
Best for: income & stability
CLFD
Clearfield, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CLFD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 106.7% 10Y total return vs CCOI's 13.1%
  • 19.6% revenue growth vs BOXL's -19.6%
  • -6.3% margin vs PRSO's -39.0%
  • +20.2% vs CCOI's -65.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
CCOI
Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

CCOI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends is your priority.

  • 19.2% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: dividends
PRSO
Peraso Inc.
The Growth Play

PRSO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 6.0%, EPS growth 86.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 36.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.11, Low D/E 9.3%, current ratio 1.80x
  • Beta 1.11, current ratio 1.80x
  • Beta 1.11 vs CLFD's 1.79
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCLFD logoCLFD19.6% revenue growth vs BOXL's -19.6%
Quality / MarginsCLFD logoCLFD-6.3% margin vs PRSO's -39.0%
Stability / SafetyPRSO logoPRSOBeta 1.11 vs CLFD's 1.79
DividendsCCOI logoCCOI19.2% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CLFD logoCLFD+20.2% vs CCOI's -65.4%
Efficiency (ROA)CLFD logoCLFD-3.0% ROA vs PRSO's -78.9%, ROIC 0.6% vs -5.1%

BOXL vs CLFD vs CCOI vs PRSO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BOXLBoxlight Corporation
FY 2025
Hardware
99.9%$104M
Professional services
0.1%$120,000
CLFDClearfield, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CCOICogent Communications Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
On-net
54.5%$532M
Off-net
40.7%$397M
Wavelength Services
3.9%$38M
Non-core
0.9%$8M
PRSOPeraso Inc.
FY 2024
Product
100.0%$14M

BOXL vs CLFD vs CCOI vs PRSO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCLFDLAGGINGPRSO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CLFD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CCOI is the larger business by revenue, generating $949M annually — 73.0x PRSO's $13M. CLFD is the more profitable business, keeping -6.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRSO's -39.0%. On growth, BOXL holds the edge at +11.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBOXL logoBOXLBoxlight Corporat…CLFD logoCLFDClearfield, Inc.CCOI logoCCOICogent Communicat…PRSO logoPRSOPeraso Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$109M$136M$949M$13M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$6M$6M$174M-$5M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$24M-$9M-$170M-$5M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$3M$15M-$208M-$5M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+30.8%+37.2%+32.4%+58.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-15.0%+1.4%-7.9%-39.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-21.8%-6.3%-17.9%-39.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.1%+10.8%-21.9%-40.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.0%-27.1%-3.2%-15.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+79.1%-142.5%+23.9%+82.7%
CLFD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BOXL leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CCOI's 21.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CLFD's 61.5x.

MetricBOXL logoBOXLBoxlight Corporat…CLFD logoCLFDClearfield, Inc.CCOI logoCCOICogent Communicat…PRSO logoPRSOPeraso Inc.
Market CapShares × price$951,873$519M$817M$7M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$33M$506M$3.5B$4M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.03x-64.64x-4.29x-0.26x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.75.91x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple61.46x21.30x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.01x3.46x0.84x0.49x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.50x2.05x0.82x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.01x
BOXL leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CLFD leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

CLFD delivers a -3.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-40 for BOXL. CLFD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOXL's 33.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLFD scores 7/9 vs BOXL's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBOXL logoBOXLBoxlight Corporat…CLFD logoCLFDClearfield, Inc.CCOI logoCCOICogent Communicat…PRSO logoPRSOPeraso Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-40.3%-3.4%-2.3%-148.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-23.5%-3.0%-5.4%-78.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital-42.3%+0.6%-3.1%-5.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-35.2%+0.8%-3.6%-2.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92735
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage33.10x0.03x0.09x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$32M-$13M$2.7B-$3M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$9M$21M$205M$3M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$42M$9M$2.9B$321,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.47x85.32x-0.52x-1243.50x
CLFD leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CLFD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CLFD five years ago would be worth $9,591 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $72 for PRSO. Over the past 12 months, CLFD leads with a +20.2% total return vs CCOI's -65.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLFD at 1.3% vs PRSO's -60.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBOXL logoBOXLBoxlight Corporat…CLFD logoCLFDClearfield, Inc.CCOI logoCCOICogent Communicat…PRSO logoPRSOPeraso Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-42.2%+27.1%-20.8%+4.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-35.1%+20.2%-65.4%+6.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-92.9%+3.9%-60.0%-93.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.0%-4.1%-57.6%-99.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.7%+106.7%+13.1%-100.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-58.6%+1.3%-26.3%-60.4%
CLFD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CLFD and PRSO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PRSO is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLFD's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLFD currently trades 80.2% from its 52-week high vs BOXL's 9.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBOXL logoBOXLBoxlight Corporat…CLFD logoCLFDClearfield, Inc.CCOI logoCCOICogent Communicat…PRSO logoPRSOPeraso Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.20x1.74x1.75x1.03x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$10.15$46.76$55.24$2.37
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.60$24.01$14.82$0.77
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+9.9%+80.2%+29.5%+39.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.857.134.346.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded401K146K1.2M9.1M
Evenly matched — CLFD and PRSO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: CLFD as "Buy", CCOI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 49.1% upside for CCOI (target: $24) vs 15.6% for CLFD (target: $43). CCOI is the only dividend payer here at 19.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricBOXL logoBOXLBoxlight Corporat…CLFD logoCLFDClearfield, Inc.CCOI logoCCOICogent Communicat…PRSO logoPRSOPeraso Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$43.33$24.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts832
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+19.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.13
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.2%+2.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

CLFD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BOXL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallClearfield, Inc. (CLFD)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BOXL vs CLFD vs CCOI vs PRSO: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BOXL or CLFD or CCOI or PRSO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Clearfield, Inc.

(CLFD) is the stronger pick with 19. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 6% for Boxlight Corporation (BOXL). Analysts rate Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — BOXL or CLFD or CCOI or PRSO?

Over the past 5 years, Clearfield, Inc.

(CLFD) delivered a total return of -4. 1%, compared to -99. 3% for Peraso Inc. (PRSO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLFD returned +120. 7% versus PRSO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — BOXL or CLFD or CCOI or PRSO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Peraso Inc.

(PRSO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 75β — meaning CCOI is approximately 70% more volatile than PRSO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 33% for Boxlight Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — BOXL or CLFD or CCOI or PRSO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clearfield, Inc.

(CLFD) is pulling ahead at 19. 6% versus -19. 6% for Boxlight Corporation (BOXL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Peraso Inc. grew EPS 86. 3% year-over-year, compared to 11. 6% for Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRSO leads at 36. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — BOXL or CLFD or CCOI or PRSO?

Clearfield, Inc.

(CLFD) is the more profitable company, earning -5. 4% net margin versus -73. 6% for Peraso Inc. — meaning it keeps -5. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLFD leads at 1. 4% versus -85. 3% for PRSO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRSO leads at 51. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is BOXL or CLFD or CCOI or PRSO more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CCOI: 49.

1% to $24. 33.

07

Which pays a better dividend — BOXL or CLFD or CCOI or PRSO?

In this comparison, CCOI (19.

2% yield) pays a dividend. BOXL, CLFD, PRSO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is BOXL or CLFD or CCOI or PRSO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Peraso Inc.

(PRSO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03)). Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a higher beta of 1. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRSO: -100. 0%, CLFD: +120. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between BOXL and CLFD and CCOI and PRSO?

These companies operate in different sectors (BOXL (Technology) and CLFD (Technology) and CCOI (Communication Services) and PRSO (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BOXL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLFD is a small-cap high-growth stock; CCOI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PRSO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CCOI pays a dividend while BOXL, CLFD, PRSO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BOXL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLFD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CCOI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 19%
  • Dividend Yield > 7.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRSO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 35%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BOXL and CLFD and CCOI and PRSO on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BOXL: 11.0% · CLFD: -27.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.