BPYPO
Brookfield Property Partners L.P.
Real Estate - Services
Market Cap$5.39B
5Y Perf.-38.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
BPYPO vs CBL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CBL
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
REIT - Retail
Market Cap$1.35B
5Y Perf.+41.4%
BPYPO vs CBL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | BPYPO | CBL |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $5.39B | $1.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.20B | $578M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-350M | $136M |
| Gross Margin | 54.3% | 7.6% |
| Operating Margin | 37.2% | 24.2% |
| Forward P/E | 6.6x | 47.6x |
| Total Debt | $54.28B | $2.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.21B | $42M |
BPYPO vs CBL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
BPYPO
CBL
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brookfield Property… (BPYPO) | 100 | 61.1 | -38.9% |
| CBL & Associates Pr… (CBL) | 100 | 141.4 | +41.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BPYPO vs CBL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CBL leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Brookfield Property Partners L.P. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BPYPO
Brookfield Property Partners L.P.
The Real Estate Income Play
BPYPO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.20, yield 9.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.20, current ratio 0.37x
- Beta 0.20, yield 9.2%, current ratio 0.37x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
CBL
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
CBL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.2%, EPS growth 132.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.9%
- 77.8% 10Y total return vs BPYPO's 3.5%
- 12.2% FFO/revenue growth vs BPYPO's -3.9%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CBL | 12.2% FFO/revenue growth vs BPYPO's -3.9% |
| Value | BPYPO | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 47.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | CBL | 23.5% margin vs BPYPO's -4.9% |
| Stability / Safety | BPYPO | Beta 0.20 vs CBL's 0.68, lower leverage |
| Dividends | BPYPO | 9.2% yield, vs CBL's 5.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | CBL | +89.0% vs BPYPO's +15.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CBL | 5.1% ROA vs BPYPO's -0.4%, ROIC 4.2% vs 2.5% |
BPYPO vs CBL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
BPYPO vs CBL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCBLLAGGINGBPYPO
BPYPOBrookfield Property P…
1leads
CBLCBL & Associates Prop…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BPYPOMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
BPYPO5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CBL8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CBL6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BPYPO and CBL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BPYPO is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.2B annually — 12.5x CBL's $578M. CBL is the more profitable business, keeping 23.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BPYPO's -4.9%. On growth, CBL holds the edge at +18.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BPYPOBrookfield Proper… | CBLCBL & Associates … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.2B | $578M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.9B | $305M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$350M | $136M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$359M | $255M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.3% | +7.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.2% | +24.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.9% | +23.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.0% | +44.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.0% | +18.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.4% | +27.9% |
Evenly matched — BPYPO and CBL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
BPYPO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CBL's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BPYPO's 14.7x.
| Metric | BPYPOBrookfield Proper… | CBLCBL & Associates … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.4B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $57.5B | $3.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.71x | 10.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.61x | 47.59x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.72x | 11.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.59x | 2.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.14x | 3.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.76x | 18.87x |
BPYPO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CBL leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CBL delivers a 42.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $43 in annual profit, vs $-1 for BPYPO. BPYPO carries lower financial leverage with a 1.42x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CBL's 5.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CBL scores 7/9 vs BPYPO's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | BPYPOBrookfield Proper… | CBLCBL & Associates … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.8% | +42.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.4% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.5% | +4.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.42x | 5.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $52.1B | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.2B | $42M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $54.3B | $2.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.73x | 1.77x |
CBL leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CBL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CBL five years ago would be worth $17,785 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,182 for BPYPO. Over the past 12 months, CBL leads with a +89.0% total return vs BPYPO's +15.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CBL at 29.4% vs BPYPO's 17.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BPYPOBrookfield Proper… | CBLCBL & Associates … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.7% | +20.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.8% | +89.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.4% | +116.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.2% | +77.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.5% | +77.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.0% | +29.4% |
CBL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BPYPO and CBL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BPYPO is the less volatile stock with a 0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CBL's 0.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | BPYPOBrookfield Proper… | CBLCBL & Associates … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.20x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.26 | $45.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.87 | $23.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.4% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.4 | 55.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 32K | 171K |
Evenly matched — BPYPO and CBL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BPYPO and CBL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BPYPO as "Buy" and CBL as "Hold". For income investors, BPYPO offers the higher dividend yield at 9.20% vs CBL's 5.71%.
| Metric | BPYPOBrookfield Proper… | CBLCBL & Associates … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.2% | +5.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.41 | $2.50 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +1.3% |
Evenly matched — BPYPO and CBL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
CBL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BPYPO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
Best OverallCBL & Associates Properties… (CBL)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
BPYPO vs CBL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BPYPO or CBL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
(CBL) is the stronger pick with 12. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Brookfield Property Partners L. P. (BPYPO). CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL) offers the better valuation at 10. 1x trailing P/E (47. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brookfield Property Partners L. P. (BPYPO) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BPYPO or CBL?
On forward P/E, Brookfield Property Partners L.
P. is actually cheaper at 6. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BPYPO or CBL?
Over the past 5 years, CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
(CBL) delivered a total return of +77. 9%, compared to -8. 2% for Brookfield Property Partners L. P. (BPYPO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CBL returned +77. 8% versus BPYPO's +3. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BPYPO or CBL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brookfield Property Partners L.
P. (BPYPO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 20β versus CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. 's 0. 68β — meaning CBL is approximately 241% more volatile than BPYPO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Brookfield Property Partners L. P. (BPYPO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 142% versus 6% for CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BPYPO or CBL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
(CBL) is pulling ahead at 12. 2% versus -3. 9% for Brookfield Property Partners L. P. (BPYPO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. grew EPS 132. 1% year-over-year, compared to -4. 6% for Brookfield Property Partners L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BPYPO leads at 8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BPYPO or CBL?
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.
(CBL) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 5% net margin versus -5. 6% for Brookfield Property Partners L. P. — meaning it keeps 23. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BPYPO leads at 38. 3% versus 24. 2% for CBL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BPYPO leads at 52. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BPYPO or CBL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Brookfield Property Partners L.
P. (BPYPO) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 47. 6x for CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. — 41. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — BPYPO or CBL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Brookfield Property Partners L. P. (BPYPO) offers the highest yield at 9. 2%, versus 5. 7% for CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL).
09Is BPYPO or CBL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Brookfield Property Partners L.
P. (BPYPO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 20), 9. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BPYPO: +3. 5%, CBL: +77. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BPYPO and CBL?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BPYPO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CBL is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(BPYPO: -29.0% · CBL: 18.8%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.