Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BRBS vs MNSB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
BRBS vs MNSB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $320M | $176M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $151M | $136M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 63.5% | 54.4% |
| Operating Margin | 9.1% | 14.0% |
| Forward P/E | 31.8x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $179M | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $116M | $25M |
BRBS vs MNSB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blue Ridge Bankshar… (BRBS) | 100 | 36.0 | -64.0% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 177.2 | +77.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BRBS vs MNSB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BRBS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 6.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 55.4%
- Beta 0.54, yield 6.1%
MNSB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -1.4%, EPS growth 210.0%
- 126.9% 10Y total return vs BRBS's -12.5%
- -1.4% NII/revenue growth vs BRBS's -13.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.4% NII/revenue growth vs BRBS's -13.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 31.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BRBS's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs MNSB's 0.66 | |
| Dividends | 6.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.4% vs BRBS's +24.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BRBS's 0.5% |
BRBS vs MNSB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BRBS vs MNSB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNSB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BRBS and MNSB operate at a comparable scale, with $151M and $136M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 11.5% (MNSB) to 7.1% (BRBS).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $151M | $136M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $15M | $23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $13M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.5% | +54.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | +14.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +7.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | +120.9% |
Valuation Metrics
MNSB leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.4x trailing earnings, MNSB trades at a 58% valuation discount to BRBS's 31.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNSB's 11.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BRBS's 25.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $320M | $176M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $383M | $221M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.82x | 13.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 25.54x | 11.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.13x | 1.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.15x | 0.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 85.53x | 16.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MNSB leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MNSB delivers a 7.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $3 for BRBS. MNSB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BRBS's 0.55x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.1% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.5% | +0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.55x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $63M | $45M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $116M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $179M | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.23x | 0.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MNSB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MNSB five years ago would be worth $12,056 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,234 for BRBS. Over the past 12 months, MNSB leads with a +26.4% total return vs BRBS's +24.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MNSB at 6.7% vs BRBS's -17.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.4% | +19.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.6% | +26.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.9% | +21.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.7% | +20.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.5% | +126.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.5% | +6.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BRBS and MNSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRBS is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNSB's 0.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNSB currently trades 93.4% from its 52-week high vs BRBS's 73.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.79 | $25.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.25 | $17.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.1% | +93.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.1 | 50.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 380K | 58K |
Analyst Outlook
MNSB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
BRBS is the only dividend payer here at 6.08% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.21 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | 0.0% |
MNSB leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
BRBS vs MNSB: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BRBS or MNSB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the stronger pick with -1. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 4% for Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (BRBS). MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BRBS or MNSB?
On trailing P/E, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the cheapest at 13. 4x versus Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. at 31. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BRBS or MNSB?
Over the past 5 years, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) delivered a total return of +20. 6%, compared to -67. 7% for Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (BRBS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNSB returned +126. 9% versus BRBS's -12. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BRBS or MNSB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.
(BRBS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 66β — meaning MNSB is approximately 22% more volatile than BRBS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 55% for Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BRBS or MNSB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is pulling ahead at -1. 4% versus -13. 4% for Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. (BRBS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 135. 5% for Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BRBS or MNSB?
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 5% net margin versus 7. 1% for Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNSB leads at 14. 0% versus 9. 1% for BRBS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BRBS leads at 63. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — BRBS or MNSB?
In this comparison, BRBS (6.
1% yield) pays a dividend. MNSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is BRBS or MNSB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.
(BRBS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54), 6. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRBS: -12. 5%, MNSB: +126. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BRBS and MNSB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BRBS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock. BRBS pays a dividend while MNSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.